by bob.briscoe » October 28th, 2020, 1:32 am
DanRaisch wrote:Having just one Admin has not been a significant issue here over the years.
Blissful ignorance is not absence of a problem. It is often said that only a tiny percentage of people highlight a problem - the silent majority just move on. No-one knows how many people have /not/ subscribed because of the single Admin not adding that single word 'unique'. We'll never know how many of those non-subscribers might have become more active contributors.
The reason I addressed you, @DanRaisch, as moderator, was not because you could fix the problem, but because you would be more likely to know who could fix the problem.
I'm sure you don't want to have to keep responding to posts like this, so I'll shut up now.
DanRaisch wrote:You're solution may not have been approved for the SeaMonkey forum if it was in reply to a thread that died several years ago.
Would I have received a rejection email (my post elicited a welcome email, but I haven't seen any rejection yet)?
[quote="DanRaisch"]Having just one Admin has not been a significant issue here over the years. [/quote]
Blissful ignorance is not absence of a problem. It is often said that only a tiny percentage of people highlight a problem - the silent majority just move on. No-one knows how many people have /not/ subscribed because of the single Admin not adding that single word 'unique'. We'll never know how many of those non-subscribers might have become more active contributors.
The reason I addressed you, @DanRaisch, as moderator, was not because you could fix the problem, but because you would be more likely to know who could fix the problem.
I'm sure you don't want to have to keep responding to posts like this, so I'll shut up now.
[quote="DanRaisch"]You're solution may not have been approved for the SeaMonkey forum if it was in reply to a thread that died several years ago.[/quote]
Would I have received a rejection email (my post elicited a welcome email, but I haven't seen any rejection yet)?