mozillaZine Forums

Frank Lion wrote:

Nandy wrote:We are on Mozilla related stuff here, which is at the top of security.

Says the guy using a one year old version of Firefox, i.e. version 54.

Seems your're a liitle upset, and about my FF version. Then I suppose your're part ot the programming squad ?

Would you let my passwords fall into darkness ?

It's a software support site, not a bank or sales entity, so you should be using a separate password from those you use on your really important sites.

And more ... hem... there are 6 letters in Mozilla ? (Anti-bot question)

Consider it an intelligence test.

Nandy wrote:-- And more ... hem... there are 6 letters in Mozilla ? (Anti-bot question)
(this one is the best one, to test the programming quality of a website, yes, yessss...)

It is 6 when you count the unique letters and not the combined total so M o z i l a = 6

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14821935
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14821965

Troll

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... &t=2973875



Why has this thread been closed?

Because it had turned into a monologue.

DanRaisch wrote:Because it had turned into a monologue.

• I understand, that you may be right.
  But by the incoherent responses, of a single person (LuvKomputrs), on the last page ...
  
  Do you have to close a thread, of maximum interest to SeaMonkey users with more than thirty pages?

ElTxolo wrote:

DanRaisch wrote:Because it had turned into a monologue.

• I understand, that you may be right.
  But by the incoherent responses, of a single person (LuvKomputrs), on the last page ...
  
  Do you have to close a thread, of maximum interest to SeaMonkey users with more than thirty pages?

To the moderators here at the mozillaZine forum.
Can you kindly please delete that particular post or any of mine that you may deem off topic to the discussion of "The Future of SeaMonkey?".
I'd do it myself, but, the thread is now locked. My sincerest apologies to the members here about that.
Didn't mean to come across as incoherent or have it become a monologue as it were and especially to go off topic or detract from the discussion about the importance with respect to the the future of the SeaMonkey browser.
That wasn't my intention at all and then give cause to have the thread closed.
And can we possibly re-open The Future of SeaMonkey? thread after that?
Thanks.

I'll unlock that thread now.

Thank You!
Can you also kindly remove my posts with:
edit: removed post due to off topic content?
Didn't see a delete function.
Thanks.

Click on the "Edit" button in the post and then click in the "Delete" box in the edit window, then click on "Submit" and OK to complete the deletion.

DanRaisch wrote:Click on the "Edit" button in the post and then click in the "Delete" box in the edit window, then click on "Submit" and OK to complete the deletion.

Just tried doing that.
I'm not seeing the "Delete" box when I am trying to delete them.
Is it because perhaps they're older posts?
Can you remove them for me? Thank You.
And thanks again for unlocking the thread.

You can't remove them after someone else has posted in the thread.
Which one's do you want to remove? Give me the displayed times.

Here are the display times.
Posted January 23rd, 2019, 2:29 pm
Posted Yesterday, 11:58 am
Posted Yesterday, 12:07 pm

LuvKomputrs wrote:Here are the display times.
Posted January 23rd, 2019, 2:29 pm
Posted Yesterday, 11:58 am
Posted Yesterday, 12:07 pm

Which, I note, have been immediately replaced with FOUR more new posts - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14822045 - all of which relate to the possibility of you trying out a different SM build and seeking advice on. The same build (2.53) that you stated in a deleted post that you have ALREADY tried out at work and found 'really good'.

Here's an idea, just stop posting on that thread for a while? As in, totally stop?