Page 4 of 211

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 9th, 2015, 2:22 pm
by patrickjdempsey
These are supposed to be links to images, however instead of displaying, they go straight to download. Probably nothing, but I'm not opening them...
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2953109

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 9th, 2015, 6:01 pm
by LoudNoise
Made the links unclickable. It appears that they are simply images but they don't load in Linux Mint.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 1:48 am
by amrad
Large image breaking forum layout:
viewtopic.php?f=37&t=2953703

Regards,

Dave.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 5:08 am
by LIMPET235
T'wasn't all that large here, Dave. ;)

Done. Ta muchly.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 11:21 am
by amrad
Perhaps you've got a different screen resolution to me, then? Mine is 1024 x 768. ;)

Regards,

Dave.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 11:24 am
by LIMPET235
Mmm...1440 x 900 on a 19" wide screen.
Bit of a diff, eh wot!

Image

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 11:28 am
by amrad
Yeah, just a bit! ;) My screen is 19" (visible 18") 4:3 standard size.

Regards,

Dave

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 11:35 am
by mightyglydd
viewtopic.php?p=14278445#p14278445

Troll hyping crapware and scamlogic.com website...?

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 12:23 pm
by Frank Lion
LIMPET235 wrote:Mmm...1440 x 900 on a 19" wide screen.
Bit of a diff, eh wot!

Image

All my themes have only ever been made on a 1024 x 768 16 inch CRT monitor.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 12:59 pm
by LIMPET235
Thanks MightyG...Moved ^^, to the trash folder.

A CRT Frank?
You should update it. Nahhh... not really.
My old CRT lasted for more than 7 years before finally giving in to old age.
Pity, as it always produced a nice image, but also generated lotsa heat,
which was not needed in the Summer time.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 2:04 pm
by James
amrad wrote:Large image breaking forum layout:
viewtopic.php?f=37&t=2953703

Since it was hosted on imgur it was easy to make it as a large thumbnail link to full size. The thumbnail is still easy enough to see what image was about.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 2:43 pm
by LIMPET235
I'm not up on the how-to, James & I ain't bothered..

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 2:57 pm
by Frank Lion
LIMPET235 wrote:A CRT Frank?

Yep, plus satin faced flatscreens on other PCs, Netbook and tablet. (so they can be used outside!) I even bought 2 more 19 inch CRTs a few years back for when this one packs up (paid £10 each and they would have been £400+ new)

For correct colour values and especially the subtlety of tonal values you still can't beat a CRT. I just couldn't make a theme without one.

If people looked at nature properly, they'd see what a pale imitation of it actually gets shown on a flatscreen.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 3:28 pm
by James
You can get colour correct IPS panel monitors like those from Eizo however those are expensive.

Wanted to get a Eizo Foris FS2333 or FS2434 to have a good color IPS panel for console and even PC use (second monitor) but they are hard to get this year without over paying. Ended up getting a Beng RL2455HM (only payed $150+tax) and while it has good input and response time compared to a CRT TV, the colour could be better even for a TN panel.

Re: Moderation / Spam / Login Activation Requests

Posted: August 12th, 2015, 5:02 pm
by Frank Lion
James wrote:You can get colour correct IPS panel monitors like those from Eizo however those are expensive..

Yep, it is possible, but as you say, expensive. I also realise that I have special requirements (much more so than just themes) and that people actually want their flatscreens looking like that. I see oversaturated unnatural colours and over-constrasted tonal values on them and the rest of the world sees, and wants, 'vivid colours and crisp, sharp images'.

Room for all, I reckon.