We're back!

Talk about stuff specific to the site -- bugs, suggestions, and of course praise welcome.
Mouse5
Posts: 1279
Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: We're back!

Post by Mouse5 »

just wondered, is there any point in updating this forum to 3.2.x ?
User avatar
Grumpus
Posts: 13238
Joined: October 19th, 2007, 4:23 am
Location: ... Da' Swamp

Re: We're back!

Post by Grumpus »

@-Arch- for the old ones who haven't become androids.
Doesn't matter what you say, it's wrong for a toaster to walk around the house and talk to you
Mouse5
Posts: 1279
Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: We're back!

Post by Mouse5 »

Grumpus wrote:@-Arch- for the old ones who haven't become androids.
doesnt make any sense for Kerz to waste his time if people like Alice etc are going to be using Chrome. there's gonna be less activity on this forum, unless you split it up into 2, Mozilla stuff as well as Chrome stuff
User avatar
Grumpus
Posts: 13238
Joined: October 19th, 2007, 4:23 am
Location: ... Da' Swamp

Re: We're back!

Post by Grumpus »

@-Arch- Alice is one person and at last look Firefox and Chrome are running neck and neck.
With changes coming it might be good to look at the changes instead of the "Chicken Little" factors.
Not supporting anything, just watching and waiting in the here and now and avoiding the screaming change nitwits.
IMO Chrome isn't Mozilla and to change the 'zine to provide for a non-Mozilla package would go against singularity.
Any Chrome dialogue should always go in the tech forum anyway.
Doesn't matter what you say, it's wrong for a toaster to walk around the house and talk to you
Mouse5
Posts: 1279
Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: We're back!

Post by Mouse5 »

Grumpus wrote:@-Arch- Alice is one person and at last look Firefox and Chrome are running neck and neck.
With changes coming it might be good to look at the changes instead of the "Chicken Little" factors.
Not supporting anything, just watching and waiting in the here and now and avoiding the screaming change nitwits.
IMO Chrome isn't Mozilla and to change the 'zine to provide for a non-Mozilla package would go against singularity.
Any Chrome dialogue should always go in the tech forum anyway.
but this forum isnt the official Mozilla Help Product forum, so i dont think it would go " against " anything .
User avatar
DanRaisch
Moderator
Posts: 127187
Joined: September 23rd, 2004, 8:57 pm
Location: Somewhere on the right coast

Re: We're back!

Post by DanRaisch »

It would for folks who have chosen Mozilla products over Outlook, Chrome, and other software choices in the same categories. Google has more than enough money to fund paid support pages.
Mouse5
Posts: 1279
Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: We're back!

Post by Mouse5 »

kerz wrote:Many thanks to OSU for help. We had a snafu with the main database, and it took a while to shake out all the issues. Thanks for your patience!
kerz
im unsure if it is already but are you intending to make this forum / domain name HTTPS an not HTTP ? when you upgrade the forum
Mouse5
Posts: 1279
Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: We're back!

Post by Mouse5 »

kerz wrote:That's in the cards, and was part of why this broke. Lots to do, little time.
any timeframe of when the forum update may be done? ( now that phpbb 3.2 is out )
Post Reply