Removing 3.6 compatibility.
- patrickjdempsey
- Posts: 23686
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
- Location: Asheville NC
- Contact:
Re: Removing 3.6 compatibility.
One must also first delete extensions.sqlite I believe, because it's all stored there. So the only reason for having it really is if you happen to install your theme from some source other than AMO, while AMO is down.
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
- KLB
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: December 21st, 2003, 9:25 am
- Location: Saco Maine
- Contact:
Re: Removing 3.6 compatibility.
I haven't been enforcing the requirement that preview.png exist in themes, but it is in the requirement. I'll try lobbying to get this requirement removed.
Ken Barbalace - AMO Editor (I focus on reviewing themes)
I maintain Classic Compact, a very compact yet clean Firefox theme.
EnvironmentalChemistry.com (Periodic Table)
I maintain Classic Compact, a very compact yet clean Firefox theme.
EnvironmentalChemistry.com (Periodic Table)
- patrickjdempsey
- Posts: 23686
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
- Location: Asheville NC
- Contact:
Re: Removing 3.6 compatibility.
I've just noticed that it's seemingly deliberately missing from Jetpacks?
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
- mcdavis
- Posts: 3195
- Joined: December 9th, 2005, 5:51 am
Re: Removing 3.6 compatibility.
You might look at :-moz-focusring too, if you didn't already, since that was new for Fx4 and wasn't there yet for 3.6. (That's Bug 418521.)
Theme Development is Radical Participation.
NNL Beta Builds for Current and Up-coming Firefox
Dear User: Your Help is Needed
NNL Beta Builds for Current and Up-coming Firefox
Dear User: Your Help is Needed
- BruceAWittmeier
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: June 9th, 2008, 10:53 am
- Location: Near 37.501685 -80.147967
Re: Removing 3.6 compatibility.
I just discovered:
-moz-transform: rotate(-15deg); <<< This works
-moz-transform: rotate (-15deg); <<< This does not because of the space after the word rotate.
I always thought parsers would properly handle spaces and the results would be the same.
Comments?
-moz-transform: rotate(-15deg); <<< This works
-moz-transform: rotate (-15deg); <<< This does not because of the space after the word rotate.
I always thought parsers would properly handle spaces and the results would be the same.
Comments?
I often take a long windy road to my destination. Upon arrival, I wonder how I missed the shortcut.
- patrickjdempsey
- Posts: 23686
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
- Location: Asheville NC
- Contact:
Re: Removing 3.6 compatibility.
Inside of a property a space is usually used to delineate separate commands in a list. In some cases you can get away with spaces within commands, but this is generally only inside of brackets, for instance: color: rgb(0, 0, 0); works, but color: rgb (0,0,0); will fail.
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
- BruceAWittmeier
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: June 9th, 2008, 10:53 am
- Location: Near 37.501685 -80.147967
Re: Removing 3.6 compatibility.
Thanks for the info. I havent hit the rgb issue yet but Im sure I would have.
I often take a long windy road to my destination. Upon arrival, I wonder how I missed the shortcut.