http://i.imgur.com/O40ZXlf.png
The Firefox devs think this is the best thing since sliced bread.
Phil
In-Content Prefs
- Philip Chee
- Posts: 6475
- Joined: March 1st, 2005, 3:03 pm
- Contact:
- patrickjdempsey
- Posts: 23686
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
- Location: Asheville NC
- Contact:
Re: In-Content Prefs
Well, at least one part of the interface will be readable to folks with impaired vision. Are they competing with someone for world's largest checkboxes? .... which appear to be about twice as big as the Reload button... strange priorities.
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
- Aris
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: February 27th, 2011, 10:14 am
Re: In-Content Prefs
Touchfriendly UI on a Desktop system, who doesn't need it?
- patrickjdempsey
- Posts: 23686
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
- Location: Asheville NC
- Contact:
Re: In-Content Prefs
Touch-friendly... right... tell that to the poor Reload button.
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21178
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: In-Content Prefs
Philip Chee wrote:http://i.imgur.com/O40ZXlf.png
The Firefox devs think this is the best thing since sliced bread.
I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on the general concept of this (not done like that, obviously, which looks like a dog's backside) but I've found it easier to wade through multi, multi options done in that incontinent style -
Also, because that stuff picks up it's font size from the content min-font size setting, there is also an accessibility win, without needing to do much. Well, it need a scrollbar for the really jumbo font sizes, but that's about it. -
http://www.pixhost.org/show/4874/21842212_sn0750.png
I'm fine just using the bookmark to the .xul, as seen in the first pic, but it does strike me that there is some mileage in this, now very old, concept that may be useful to a wider audience.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
- Philip Chee
- Posts: 6475
- Joined: March 1st, 2005, 3:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: In-Content Prefs
Frank Lion wrote:I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on the general concept of this (not done like that, obviously, which looks like a dog's backside) but I've found it easier to wade through multi, multi options done in that incontinent style -
Also, because that stuff picks up it's font size from the content min-font size setting, there is also an accessibility win, without needing to do much. Well, it need a scrollbar for the really jumbo font sizes, but that's about it. -
http://www.pixhost.org/show/4874/21842212_sn0750.png
Wow. Looks fabulous!
Frank Lion wrote:I'm fine just using the bookmark to the .xul, as seen in the first pic, but it does strike me that there is some mileage in this, now very old, concept that may be useful to a wider audience.
Yeah we probably want about:preferences or whatever about: that Firefox is using.
Phil