That's the one I'm not sure about. I was trying to get it to represent img, embed, iframe, and object all in one go. But then I still get some ads at nytimes.com that match dimensions I've specified. Most of the ads I think I block are because of the src keywords.
Well if it doesn't actually specify width="480" and height="60" then it won't catch. The CSS selectors only work on attributes that are specified.
btw, where did you find into on *= ? I've been trying to find a good selector reference, but can't seem to find one anywhere.
At the bottom are the lines:
display: none;
visibility: hidden;
I assume this means that the images are hidden ? ie, they are still downloaded but not displayed. If so , is there a way to make the images not download either. Possibly some way to rewrite the url to a non existent one ?
tolchz wrote:At the bottom are the lines: display: none; visibility: hidden;
I assume this means that the images are hidden ? ie, they are still downloaded but not displayed. If so , is there a way to make the images not download either. Possibly some way to rewrite the url to a non existent one ?
Yes, they are still downloaded, but not displayed. Rewriting URLs is not supported in CSS. There's no way that I know of to do this right now. Would be nice, wouldn't it?
tolchz wrote:I assume this means that the images are hidden ? ie, they are still downloaded but not displayed. If so , is there a way to make the images not download either. Possibly some way to rewrite the url to a non existent one ?
Paste in some CSS, and it will explain in English (or Spanish) what the selector actually does. Can be good for some tricky stuff.
What I would like is a WYSIWYG that will write smart CSS. I'm trying to move away from absolute positioning, but I wind up with objects wrapping where I don't want them to. Practice practice practice.
mozillaZine is an independent Mozilla community and advocacy site. We're not affiliated or endorsed by the Mozilla Corporation but we love them just the same.
