OLD NoScript 1.1.4, bookmarks and places friendly
- Giorgio Maone
- Posts: 3516
- Joined: September 21st, 2004, 12:05 am
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
jcat00uk wrote:im having the same problem, even if i disable the extension it still don't work...only removing the extension will get it working
Yesterday I announced this Firefox bug causing this problem had been fixed.
It looks like they had some trouble checking in it the patch, though, hence one day delay has occurred.
It should be in CVS now:
Bugzilla bug 296764 wrote:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296764
------- Additional Comments From bugmail sicking.cc 2005-06-30 12:10 PDT -------
Ok, everything should be checked in now. Waiting with marking this fixed until
everything has cycled green
So expect it in next nightlies...
- johnlgalt
- Posts: 228
- Joined: January 25th, 2005, 12:18 pm
- Location: 3rd rock
- Contact:
Giorgio,
Congrats on all your hard work with FlashGot, NoScript and the bug fixes. Keep up the good work.
Congrats on all your hard work with FlashGot, NoScript and the bug fixes. Keep up the good work.
- Vista x64 Forums Moderator
Calendar of Updates Admin
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: June 18th, 2004, 11:56 am
Is there any way to simplify usage/maintainance when noscript is used alongside with flashblock,greasemonkey etc? I'm using noscript on a trial basis and find it very hard to maintain because you need to whitelist every site just so flashblock etc. would work . Would adding regular expression support to noscript's whitelist allow user based javascript(flashblock, greasemonkey scripts etc) to pass through. Im hoping there is some reg exp to let the flashblock, greasemonkey scripts to go through without the need to whitelisting every single site via noscript?
I did read your reply about the bugs and security issue so guess i'm outta luck for now ?
I did read your reply about the bugs and security issue so guess i'm outta luck for now ?
- Giorgio Maone
- Posts: 3516
- Joined: September 21st, 2004, 12:05 am
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
naddude wrote:Giorgio:
Great extension but still occasional crashes when switching permissions (even with auto reload disabled). Still I am waiting for 1.05 and hope that fixes.
Cheers
Naddude, which browser version are you using exactly?
Please paste your user-agent as you see it in the Firefox "About" box...
Thank you
- Giorgio Maone
- Posts: 3516
- Joined: September 21st, 2004, 12:05 am
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
naddude wrote:Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4
Thank you!
Well, it's quite obvious the crash bug is still there. I've fixed it yesterday!
Hence, fixed Firefox versions are those with a build number higher than 20050630...
If you're brave enough, you can grab one of these (pre-release, not guaranteed) builds:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/
"Trunk" stands for main development tree (1.0+), currently known as Deer Park and leading to Fx 1.1
"Aviary" is the branch leading to Fx 1.0.5.
If you're not in the mood for beta testing, instead, you may want to wait for "official" Fx 1.0.5 release
Last edited by Giorgio Maone on July 1st, 2005, 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Giorgio Maone
- Posts: 3516
- Joined: September 21st, 2004, 12:05 am
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
TychoQuad wrote:I wouldn't go about recomending Deer Park, as anyone who has serious problems would have even more serious problems trying to go back to 1.0.x
Agree.
It's worth to stress that nightly builds, as well as Deer Park alphas, are developer tools not for end-user.
If you don't consider yourself a "geek", stay with official versions (wait for Fx 1.0.5 final release to have this fix).
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: May 10th, 2005, 9:06 am
- Location: Wet Coast, Canada
Thanks again Giorgio:
I have the beta version but will wait a bit. Last time I installed 1.04 beta many extensions failed. Right now I can use yours but am careful with deactivating auto reload (when allowing scripts) or when changing status. I very much appreciate your extension. An absolute necessity (unfortunately) along with anti virus and antispyware programs. So thanks for your hard work and intellect.
Ciao from Canada!
PS any idea when 1.05 final will be out?
Or what the changes will be?
I have the beta version but will wait a bit. Last time I installed 1.04 beta many extensions failed. Right now I can use yours but am careful with deactivating auto reload (when allowing scripts) or when changing status. I very much appreciate your extension. An absolute necessity (unfortunately) along with anti virus and antispyware programs. So thanks for your hard work and intellect.
Ciao from Canada!
PS any idea when 1.05 final will be out?
Or what the changes will be?
-
- Posts: 1510
- Joined: May 8th, 2004, 1:38 pm
This is just Fantastic
Intuitive, easy, well written, no slowdown in FX opening despite 58k size -- NoScript 1.0.9 just rocks - it's been intalled less than 5 minutes and I found only three sites in all my bookmarks that needed to be "protected." Just excellent!!
Last edited by paulfox on July 2nd, 2005, 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- hiyel
- Posts: 9
- Joined: November 16th, 2004, 8:37 pm
NoScript icon
Hi,
I have a question about the colors of the icon and what they represent.
What I understand from the features page is that, if there is not any script on a webpage then the S of the icon will be white. But that's not the case I think:
For example I see the blue S with the red strip on a page and when I hover on the icon it says zero script. Well if there is zero script on that page shouldn't the icon be white?
And on the feature page I see that there is an icon with white S and the red strip. If white S means no script, then what's the red strip for, what does NoScript blocking and showing me the red stip?
Obviously I am missing something here
Thanks
I have a question about the colors of the icon and what they represent.
What I understand from the features page is that, if there is not any script on a webpage then the S of the icon will be white. But that's not the case I think:
For example I see the blue S with the red strip on a page and when I hover on the icon it says zero script. Well if there is zero script on that page shouldn't the icon be white?
And on the feature page I see that there is an icon with white S and the red strip. If white S means no script, then what's the red strip for, what does NoScript blocking and showing me the red stip?
Obviously I am missing something here
Thanks