Javascript Performance Thread
- streetwolf
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: August 21st, 2011, 8:07 am
- Location: NJ (USA)
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
To be honest I haven't run any of these benchmarks for a long time until I saw that IM hit the hourlies and I just wanted to see what I'd get. I know they are lower than the last time I ran them but a lot has happened since then and now. And really, do these benchmarks really mean all that much?
Intel i9-13900K | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO DDR5 | 64GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 @ 6600 Mhz.
H100i ELITE CAPELLIX XT Liquid CPU Cooler | PNY 12GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 2 CORSAIR 2TB MP600 PRO XT GEN 4
HX1200 PLATINUM PSU | XENEON 32" IPS UHD 144Hz | BenQ 32" UHD | MS Windows 11 Pro
H100i ELITE CAPELLIX XT Liquid CPU Cooler | PNY 12GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 2 CORSAIR 2TB MP600 PRO XT GEN 4
HX1200 PLATINUM PSU | XENEON 32" IPS UHD 144Hz | BenQ 32" UHD | MS Windows 11 Pro
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: July 18th, 2004, 10:04 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
a link to some test results for sunspider, kraken, v8, and octane between firefox before/after ion, current safari and current chrome canary
http://pastebin.mozilla.org/1816714
http://pastebin.mozilla.org/1816714
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: January 5th, 2006, 8:47 am
- Location: Dortmund/Germany
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
With last hourly, i got a error by RayTrace on V8 Benchmark Suite - version 7.
Windows 10 1903 x64
Firefox Nightly x64
Firefox Nightly x64
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: September 12th, 2012, 10:49 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
JM+TI+ION=JM+TI now?
that's a real regression!
that's a real regression!
-
- Posts: 8829
- Joined: May 7th, 2006, 10:29 pm
- Location: California
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
herom wrote:JM+TI+ION=JM+TI now?
that's a real regression!
Erm, being on par or better than what it was without Ion while not even coming close to being done optimizing things is a regression?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: September 12th, 2012, 10:49 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
I was talking about the recent regression as it was on arewefastyet.comKWierso wrote:herom wrote:JM+TI+ION=JM+TI now?
that's a real regression!
Erm, being on par or better than what it was without Ion while not even coming close to being done optimizing things is a regression?
but they got it fixed quickly, so... never mind.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: April 1st, 2011, 10:03 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
herom wrote:I was talking about the recent regression as it was on arewefastyet.com
but they got it fixed quickly, so... never mind.
Well, for the 32-bit machine. The 64-bit machine thinks that JM+TI is JM+TI+Ion at the moment.
Probably will get fixed soon enough anyways.
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: June 23rd, 2010, 5:48 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
It looks like it's just a bug with AWFY running the wrong engine now that it has landed on mc.
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: July 23rd, 2004, 11:48 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Machines 8 & 9 still broken :/. Machine 8 doubly so (it has stopped recording Firefox engines and I'm guessing it will have the same issue as Machine 9 when fixed.
Machine 8
http://arewefastyet.com/?view=regress&machine=8
http://arewefastyet.com/?runs=650&view= ... &machine=8
Machine 9
http://arewefastyet.com/?view=regress&machine=9
http://arewefastyet.com/?runs=650&view= ... &machine=9
Machine 8
http://arewefastyet.com/?view=regress&machine=8
http://arewefastyet.com/?runs=650&view= ... &machine=8
Machine 9
http://arewefastyet.com/?view=regress&machine=9
http://arewefastyet.com/?runs=650&view= ... &machine=9
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: September 18th, 2008, 2:57 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
iamhere wrote:Machines 8 & 9 still broken :/. Machine 8 doubly so (it has stopped recording Firefox engines and I'm guessing it will have the same issue as Machine 9 when fixed.
Yeah, but 11 & 12 were bought to replace 8 & 9 so I don't expect them to be fixed anytime soon...
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: April 1st, 2011, 10:03 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Looks like parts 2 and 3 of bug 786126 probably have caused some serious regressions to misc-bugs-612930-solve-sudoku and misc-bugs-608733-trace-compiler, as well as minor regressions to ss-raytrace and kraken-crypto-pbkdf2 which are showing up on the 64-bit AWFY machine.
Not that I think that the javascript developers check this thread too much, and they might notice it on their own, but still good to give a heads up just in case, since sometimes these regressions that occurred aren't immediately obvious at times (especially when there's more than one at once, and one ends up getting forgotten).
EDIT: It also appears that there was a further regression as well which might have been caused when fixing some security bugs by Nicolas B. Pierron (somewhere in bugs 794286, 787848, 787309, and 792220). They've regressed v8 rather significantly on DeltaBlue, EarleyBoyer and RayTrace, as well as kraken-crypto-ccm and kraken-crypto-pbkdf2 again.
EDIT 2: The regressions in the last edit have been fixed from backing all of those bugs out, but the original regressions still stand, it looks like.
EDIT 3: All regressions fixed now.
Not that I think that the javascript developers check this thread too much, and they might notice it on their own, but still good to give a heads up just in case, since sometimes these regressions that occurred aren't immediately obvious at times (especially when there's more than one at once, and one ends up getting forgotten).
EDIT: It also appears that there was a further regression as well which might have been caused when fixing some security bugs by Nicolas B. Pierron (somewhere in bugs 794286, 787848, 787309, and 792220). They've regressed v8 rather significantly on DeltaBlue, EarleyBoyer and RayTrace, as well as kraken-crypto-ccm and kraken-crypto-pbkdf2 again.
EDIT 2: The regressions in the last edit have been fixed from backing all of those bugs out, but the original regressions still stand, it looks like.
EDIT 3: All regressions fixed now.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: February 23rd, 2011, 1:18 am
- JayhawksRock
- Posts: 10433
- Joined: October 24th, 2010, 8:51 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
jiangiang wrote:v8 take the crown from ionMonkey in kraken test
http://arewefastyet.com/?a=b&view=regress
OK.. so what does that mean to me while I am reading emails or browsing this forum?
"The trouble with quotes on the internet is you never know if they are genuine" ...Abraham Lincoln
-
- Posts: 8829
- Joined: May 7th, 2006, 10:29 pm
- Location: California
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
jiangiang wrote:v8 take the crown from ionMonkey in kraken test
http://arewefastyet.com/?a=b&view=regress
20 ms faster? Oh the humanity!