Javascript Performance Thread
-
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: July 28th, 2009, 4:52 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Maybe the blockers bugs of this bug? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745386 (LandIon)
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Not sure. Brendan Eich was positive that the engine would push through Thursday last week. Its probably going to need a full cycle to test. So the sooner the better.
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: September 18th, 2008, 2:57 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
The plan is still to land IonMonkey for FF 18, this week or early next week. It took a while because there was some uncertainty about b2g - we will land with Ion disabled there, see bug 789373.
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: September 18th, 2008, 2:57 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
IonMonkey just landed on mozilla-central
-
- Posts: 5472
- Joined: May 13th, 2012, 10:43 am
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: September 17th, 2010, 7:55 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Posting from latest hourly build with Ionmonkey. Seems to work fine here.
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: July 18th, 2012, 11:57 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Disabled or enabled by default?
Sorry for my bad English. Even if there wasn't a mistake.
-
- Posts: 8829
- Joined: May 7th, 2006, 10:29 pm
- Location: California
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Enabled everywhere bug b2g, I think.
- Zlip792
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: May 7th, 2011, 1:47 pm
- Location: Pakistan
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Srap wrote:Disabled or enabled by default?
I think performance was fair enough to land it enabled. It was disabled only for B2G builds, so Yes, I think it is enabled.
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
- Edds
- Posts: 332
- Joined: July 21st, 2010, 1:13 pm
- Location: SVK
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
So my test results with latest m-c hourly.
SunSpider 0.9.1
1. Total: 106.4ms +/- 1.0% - Chrome 19.0.1084.46 beta-m
2. Total: 113.9ms +/- 0.6% - Firefox 16 beta
3. Total: 145.0ms +/- 1.6% - Firefox 18.0a1 (2012-09-11)
Kraken 1.1
1. Total: 1339.9ms +/- 0.7% - Firefox 18.0a1 (2012-09-11)
2. Total: 1409.1ms +/- 1.2% - Chrome 22.0.1229.39 beta-m
3. Total: 1804.5ms +/- 1.4% - Firefox 16 beta
V8 version 7
1. Score: 20736 - Chrome 22.0.1229.39 beta-m
2. Score: 14764 - Firefox 18.0a1 (2012-09-11)
3. Score: 13020 - Firefox 16 beta
Test system in signature.
SunSpider 0.9.1
1. Total: 106.4ms +/- 1.0% - Chrome 19.0.1084.46 beta-m
2. Total: 113.9ms +/- 0.6% - Firefox 16 beta
3. Total: 145.0ms +/- 1.6% - Firefox 18.0a1 (2012-09-11)
Kraken 1.1
1. Total: 1339.9ms +/- 0.7% - Firefox 18.0a1 (2012-09-11)
2. Total: 1409.1ms +/- 1.2% - Chrome 22.0.1229.39 beta-m
3. Total: 1804.5ms +/- 1.4% - Firefox 16 beta
V8 version 7
1. Score: 20736 - Chrome 22.0.1229.39 beta-m
2. Score: 14764 - Firefox 18.0a1 (2012-09-11)
3. Score: 13020 - Firefox 16 beta
Test system in signature.
Laptop: Intel Core i5 1240P | 16GB DDR4 | 500GB NVMe | 1080p | Win 11
Phone: Samsung S24 Ultra | Android 14
Phone: Samsung S24 Ultra | Android 14
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: March 24th, 2011, 10:38 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
With IonMonkey
Octane-benchmark
Box2DWeb ->Error
RayTrace ->Error
Mandreel ->Error
V8 version 7
RayTrace: error
Octane-benchmark
Box2DWeb ->Error
RayTrace ->Error
Mandreel ->Error
V8 version 7
RayTrace: error
sry for my bad english.
My real user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv: current nightly) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/current nightly
My real user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv: current nightly) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/current nightly
- streetwolf
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: August 21st, 2011, 8:07 am
- Location: NJ (USA)
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
With IonMonkey
SunSpider 0.9.1 ..... 146.1ms +/- 0.8%
Kraken 1.1 ...... 1289.5ms +/- 0.7%
V8 Version 7 ...... 14806
I'm assuming that IM is on by default?
SunSpider 0.9.1 ..... 146.1ms +/- 0.8%
Kraken 1.1 ...... 1289.5ms +/- 0.7%
V8 Version 7 ...... 14806
I'm assuming that IM is on by default?
Intel i9-13900K | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO DDR5 | 64GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 @ 6600 Mhz.
H100i ELITE CAPELLIX XT Liquid CPU Cooler | PNY 12GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 2 CORSAIR 2TB MP600 PRO XT GEN 4
HX1200 PLATINUM PSU | XENEON 32" IPS UHD 144Hz | BenQ 32" UHD | MS Windows 11 Pro
H100i ELITE CAPELLIX XT Liquid CPU Cooler | PNY 12GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 2 CORSAIR 2TB MP600 PRO XT GEN 4
HX1200 PLATINUM PSU | XENEON 32" IPS UHD 144Hz | BenQ 32" UHD | MS Windows 11 Pro
- streetwolf
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: August 21st, 2011, 8:07 am
- Location: NJ (USA)
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Ran same tests on the respin of IM.
SunSpider 0.9.1 ..... 122.4ms +/- 2.0%
Kraken 1.1 ...... 1207.4ms +/- 1.9%
V8 Version 7 ...... 15416
SunSpider 0.9.1 ..... 122.4ms +/- 2.0%
Kraken 1.1 ...... 1207.4ms +/- 1.9%
V8 Version 7 ...... 15416
Intel i9-13900K | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO DDR5 | 64GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 @ 6600 Mhz.
H100i ELITE CAPELLIX XT Liquid CPU Cooler | PNY 12GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 2 CORSAIR 2TB MP600 PRO XT GEN 4
HX1200 PLATINUM PSU | XENEON 32" IPS UHD 144Hz | BenQ 32" UHD | MS Windows 11 Pro
H100i ELITE CAPELLIX XT Liquid CPU Cooler | PNY 12GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 2 CORSAIR 2TB MP600 PRO XT GEN 4
HX1200 PLATINUM PSU | XENEON 32" IPS UHD 144Hz | BenQ 32" UHD | MS Windows 11 Pro
-
- Posts: 5472
- Joined: May 13th, 2012, 10:43 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
It would be much more interesting if you posted benchmarks with a build before, and the build with IM.
I have never taken time to benchmark builds, so I can't really tell how much/less improvement occurred with the landing.
The few times I've ran benchmarks my numbers were so below others posted, I gave up and decided my machine was low-end, and don't really worry too much about it as long as it feels smooth and operates without excess jank.
I have never taken time to benchmark builds, so I can't really tell how much/less improvement occurred with the landing.
The few times I've ran benchmarks my numbers were so below others posted, I gave up and decided my machine was low-end, and don't really worry too much about it as long as it feels smooth and operates without excess jank.