Erunno wrote:Omega X wrote:The "press" also got word of it.
Webmonkey as usual took the typical Chrome spin.
Not everyone prefers to put on the blinders when it comes to the competition.
Says, the chief of Chrome spin.
Erunno wrote:Omega X wrote:The "press" also got word of it.
Webmonkey as usual took the typical Chrome spin.
Not everyone prefers to put on the blinders when it comes to the competition.
Omega X wrote:Erunno wrote:Omega X wrote:The "press" also got word of it.
Webmonkey as usual took the typical Chrome spin.
Not everyone prefers to put on the blinders when it comes to the competition.
Says, the chief of Chrome spin.
neo86 wrote:Can you name a JS program where Firefox is faster than Chrome?
neo86 wrote:Can you name a JS program where Firefox is faster than Chrome?
RyanJ wrote:neo86 wrote:Can you name a JS program where Firefox is faster than Chrome?
TM performs a lot better on most benchmarks, the issue comes that tracing isn't compatible with all code types, for obvious reasons that has been discussed several times.
neo86 wrote:Can you name a JS program where Firefox is faster than Chrome?
Tom B. wrote:Here's a case where Google Chrome runs rings around the latest TraceMonkey build. Do the following in both browsers:
1) Go to http://chesstempo.com/game-database.html.
2) Click the "Games for Position" tab on the screen and, if necessary, scroll the list into view.
3) Press the Right Arrow key on the keyboard.
4) Wait for the list to finish loading.
5) Press Right Arrow again.
Now we're ready for the speed test:
6) Press Left Arrow twice (once at a time).
Google Chrome updates the list in a flash, while the latest TraceMonkey build is pretty slow and laggy.
Tom B. wrote:Here's a case where Google Chrome runs rings around the latest TraceMonkey build.
neo86 wrote:Hmm, I was hoping for something more exciting.