Javascript Performance Thread

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Post Reply
mattcoz
Posts: 1021
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 11:15 pm

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by mattcoz »

Nice, hopefully we'll see some big gains soon.
User avatar
ioiokzkz
Posts: 243
Joined: December 17th, 2008, 9:38 pm

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by ioiokzkz »

http://arewefastyet.com/?machine=4
Looks like it crashed during the v8 test, if not I'm pretty okay with 0ms... :lol:

Anyway SS is doing well, JM under x64 should be fast as x86 before long. :)
User avatar
mistertwol
Posts: 425
Joined: June 14th, 2010, 9:23 pm

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by mistertwol »

ioiokzkz wrote:http://arewefastyet.com/?machine=4
Looks like it crashed during the v8 test, if not I'm pretty okay with 0ms... :lol:

Anyway SS is doing well, JM under x64 should be fast as x86 before long. :)


lol I'm pretty sure that's higher than a 100% gain.
User avatar
Adrian1
Posts: 154
Joined: May 5th, 2010, 4:40 am

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by Adrian1 »

ioiokzkz wrote:http://arewefastyet.com/?machine=4
Looks like it crashed during the v8 test, if not I'm pretty okay with 0ms... :lol:

Anyway SS is doing well, JM under x64 should be fast as x86 before long. :)

I like the 100% performance increase :D
User avatar
Edds
Posts: 332
Joined: July 21st, 2010, 1:13 pm
Location: SVK

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by Edds »

http://bit.ly/cp7Ma6

Firefox beta2 is now in fifth place :( I hope that the final version will be as fast as Chrome or Opera..
Laptop: Intel Core i5 1240P | 16GB DDR4 | 500GB NVMe | 1080p | Win 11
Phone: Samsung S24 Ultra | Android 14
User avatar
bogas04
Posts: 977
Joined: May 18th, 2010, 1:14 am

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by bogas04 »

Edds wrote:http://bit.ly/cp7Ma6

Firefox beta2 is now in fifth place :( I hope that the final version will be as fast as Chrome or Opera..

First , its pre beta 2 (in the site , not the link u gave) , second , pre beta 3 is what gives significant boost (not included , for obvious reasons :P). Third , JM and TM have much more to give yet
So don't worry :)
bogas04.github.io
MacBook Air Mid 2013 |@bogas04
User avatar
patrickjdempsey
Posts: 23686
Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
Location: Asheville NC
Contact:

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by patrickjdempsey »

Edds wrote:http://bit.ly/cp7Ma6

Firefox beta2 is now in fifth place :( I hope that the final version will be as fast as Chrome or Opera..


Would you mind editing your post and changing that to a real link? This isn't Twitter you can post as long a link as you like, it will be automatically truncated. ;)
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
User avatar
orizng
Posts: 695
Joined: November 8th, 2002, 7:25 pm
Location: DALLAS,TX

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by orizng »

Edds wrote:http://bit.ly/cp7Ma6

Firefox beta2 is now in fifth place :( I hope that the final version will be as fast as Chrome or Opera..

no worries, it should be even faster than those two. keep your finger crossed
mattcoz
Posts: 1021
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 11:15 pm

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by mattcoz »

orizng wrote:
Edds wrote:http://bit.ly/cp7Ma6

Firefox beta2 is now in fifth place :( I hope that the final version will be as fast as Chrome or Opera..

no worries, it should be even faster than those two. keep your finger crossed

Yeah, it should be, but I'll believe it when I see it.
User avatar
orizng
Posts: 695
Joined: November 8th, 2002, 7:25 pm
Location: DALLAS,TX

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by orizng »

mattcoz wrote:
orizng wrote:
Edds wrote:http://bit.ly/cp7Ma6

Firefox beta2 is now in fifth place :( I hope that the final version will be as fast as Chrome or Opera..

no worries, it should be even faster than those two. keep your finger crossed

Yeah, it should be, but I'll believe it when I see it.

yeah, me too

I do have confidence tho, computer code isn't far away from rocket science, it is what it is, nightly has improved 15% so far, in just two weeks since the beta2.
dutchguy
Posts: 199
Joined: October 14th, 2003, 12:39 am

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by dutchguy »

Have a look again at http://arewefastyet.com/?machine=6, the V8 scores got 26% better :)
mattcoz
Posts: 1021
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 11:15 pm

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by mattcoz »

dutchguy wrote:Have a look again at http://arewefastyet.com/?machine=6, the V8 scores got 26% better :)

:shock:

Nice! :)
Cru_N_cher
Posts: 377
Joined: January 31st, 2010, 11:15 am

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by Cru_N_cher »

Yeah but still if you compare the jaegermonkey builds from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ ... key-win32/ (without mixed heuristics yet) it's still much slower compared to either Opera or Chrome (especially in the real world JSNES demo) :(
Funny is if you test with mandelins bar benchmarks in Opera and Chrome how the bars explode out of the screen compared to Firefox Jaegermonkey Builds ;)

http://people.mozilla.com/~dmandelin/Su ... demos.html
User avatar
sciguyryan
Folder@Home
Posts: 2181
Joined: November 10th, 2004, 1:33 pm
Location: Wales

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by sciguyryan »

People really, really, really need to stop comparing Firefox against Chrome until the final versions are set and done - since at the moment we are looking only at parts of a much larger work. Hold judgements until you actually see the end product please ;)

Again, this isn't the place to discuss how much faster or slower TM and JM are than other browsers but to discuss the progress on their work to increase the performance. When they are done then it'll be a fair comparison.
Cheers!

Ryan Jones
mattcoz
Posts: 1021
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 11:15 pm

Re: Firefox 4.0 TM and JM Performance Thread

Post by mattcoz »

Yikes, what happened to TM?
Post Reply