MozillaZine

Javascript Performance Thread

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Adrian1

User avatar
 
Posts: 154
Joined: May 5th, 2010, 4:40 am

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 5:57 am

A big improvment for me with it o SS, from 890.2ms to 592.0 ms

Theliel
 
Posts: 101
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 8:41 am

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 7:48 am

SS:

375.0 -> 309.2

WonderCsabo
 
Posts: 2230
Joined: June 25th, 2010, 9:29 am
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 8:06 am

AWFY is still dead. :S What's happened?

adisimpson
 
Posts: 43
Joined: November 10th, 2008, 4:21 pm

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 8:59 am

dont know why, but here is the jm merge not faster. one week away tested 288ms and todays build 271ms.... not impressed do i something wrong ?
Core2Duo E8500 @ 4 Ghz @ FSB500 - 4GB - GTX 460 - Win7 x64

El Pino
 
Posts: 403
Joined: October 30th, 2005, 9:15 am

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 9:06 am

adisimpson wrote:dont know why, but here is the jm merge not faster. one week away tested 288ms and todays build 271ms.... not impressed do i something wrong ?

Run yesterday's build still? Judging from your useragent that is...

Edds

User avatar
 
Posts: 142
Joined: July 21st, 2010, 1:13 pm
Location: Central Europe

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 4:07 pm

SS
Beta 5: 382.6ms > Beta 6pre (20100911): 318.6ms > Opera 10.60: 251.6ms > Chrome 7 dev> 235.0ms
nice work :)
PC: CPU: Core i5 4670K@4.5Ghz, MB: MSI Z97 GAMING7, VGA: MSI GTX670PE, RAM: 8GB DDR3, SSD: Crucial M4 128GB, OS: W7 x64 SP1
NB: CPU: Core i3 4030U@1.9Ghz, VGA: Intel HD4400, RAM: 4GB DDR3, SSHD: Seagate 500GB, OS: W10 x64 TP Phone: LG G2 32GB
Browsers: Firefox Beta & Nightly

Pillum
 
Posts: 126
Joined: June 26th, 2010, 2:42 pm

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 4:41 pm

holy moly,

am I the only one who gets a worse result with the newest nightlies/hourlies?

2 days ago the SS result was 520ms and now it is 760.4ms +/- 0.7%!! :/

teoli2003
 
Posts: 5091
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 2:54 am

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 10:18 pm

@edds, @pillum: you are not using a build with JM... That's the 20100912 nightly that you need.

Pillum
 
Posts: 126
Joined: June 26th, 2010, 2:42 pm

Post Posted September 12th, 2010, 11:29 pm

now its 590ms but it was 502ms with some recent build..

WonderCsabo
 
Posts: 2230
Joined: June 25th, 2010, 9:29 am
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post Posted September 13th, 2010, 1:49 am

Are you soure JM and TM enabled?

javascript.options.tracejit.content;true
javascript.options.methodjit.content;true

Pillum
 
Posts: 126
Joined: June 26th, 2010, 2:42 pm

Post Posted September 13th, 2010, 2:36 am

yep, everything except javascript.options.methodjit.chrome is true

WonderCsabo
 
Posts: 2230
Joined: June 25th, 2010, 9:29 am
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post Posted September 13th, 2010, 2:48 am

Pillum wrote:yep, everything except javascript.options.methodjit.chrome is true


Have you tried fresh profile?


AWFY is back on track!

Another 4% win yesterday!

Pillum
 
Posts: 126
Joined: June 26th, 2010, 2:42 pm

Post Posted September 13th, 2010, 3:13 am

btw. are there any plans to port JM to ARM (Fennec)?

edit: fresh profile but same results

bzbarsky

User avatar
 
Posts: 478
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 1:36 pm

Post Posted September 13th, 2010, 3:19 am

Pillum wrote:btw. are there any plans to port JM to ARM (Fennec)?

Judging by the state of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cg ... t%20Engine I would say yes. ;)

Pillum
 
Posts: 126
Joined: June 26th, 2010, 2:42 pm

Post Posted September 13th, 2010, 3:50 am

http://gopherwoodstudios.com/sandtrap/sand-trap.htm isnt fast with firefox (and it's no benchmark).
is JM+TM still getting tuned or was this all performance we can get?

Return to Firefox Builds


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests