Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Peter(6)

Posts: 13011Joined: September 4th, 2003, 1:26 amLocation: Maassluis, The Netherlands
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 8:33 am
A couple of notes about the Nightly thread.Nightly Build thread RSS feed (courtesy DaCypher) The Official Win32 20110504 NIGHTLY build is out.The Official Win32 20110504 AURORA build is out.Previous NIGHTLY 20110503 (FF6) Previous AURORA 20110503 (FF5) Hourly NIGHTLY builds : mozilla-central-linux || mozilla-central-macosx || mozilla-central-win32 || Firefox Tinderbox || NIGHTLY ChangelogHourly NIGHTLY archive for Windows, Mac and Linux (not the final format yet) AURORA Tinderbox || AURORA changelogLast update: 2011-05-04 -- 07:30 PDT = 14:30 UTC Last NIGHTLY Changeset: c3c4c902e9cd Last AURORA Changeset: 6e14d840b803 Fixed:
NIGHTLY
- #384672 [Core:Style System (CSS)]-Escaped newline handling should be limited to strings [All]
- #451833 [Firefox:Location Bar]-Highlight the domain name in the address bar [All]
- #600020 [Core:Video/Audio]-"ASSERTION: Must know the source we were loading from" [Mac]
- #621517 [Mozilla Services:Firefox Sync: UI]-Sync UI: Add a Device wizard pixel-shifts while validating J-PAKE pin [All]
- #633653 [Toolkit:General]-revamp about:memory [All]
- #645883 [Mozilla Services:Firefox Sync: UI]-"Deactivate this device" should not default to action [All]
- #649795 [Core:Plug-ins]-crash [@ nsPluginStreamListenerPeer::ServeStreamAsFile(nsIRequest*, nsISupports*)] [All]
- #652483 [Mozilla Services:Firefox Sync: UI]-Sync UI: When printing or saving a sync key, the dialog prompts you to change it [All]
- #653307 [Mozilla Services:Firefox Sync: Backend]-Adjust reCAPTCHA NoScript hack in Sync [All]
- #654106 [Core:HTML: Parser]-Setting innerHTML on anything contributes to memory problem [All]
AURORA
- #646460 [Core:Security: PSM]-Don't allow to override after treating certificates as revoked [All]
- #651578 [Firefox:General]-Aurora About Dialog channel switcher should have left-aligned, not centered text [All]
- #653645 [Core:Style System (CSS)]-css3-animations should not override user or UA !important declarations [All]
Partial Landings/WIPs/Incoming:
NIGHTLY None AURORA None Regressions/Annoying/Common bugs:
- #640452 [Core:General]-[meta] leaks and quasi-leaks for Firefox 5 [All]
- #640457 [Core:General]-[meta] memory size reductions for Firefox 5 [All]
Nightly fixes since 20110322 (mozilla 2.2) = ~876Aurora 5.0 fixes since 20110322 (mozilla 2.2) = ~631Draft Roadmap Firefox 5(Q2)-6(Q3)-7(Q4) see HERE
Last edited by Peter(6) on May 4th, 2011, 9:23 am, edited 3 times in total.
nightly build threads 20040225 (FF 0.8.0+) - 20120331 (FF14a)
daegored4
Posts: 3Joined: May 3rd, 2011, 8:01 am
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 8:59 am
From the last thread right before it closed: as of some recently Nightly build on Ubuntu, my live bookmarks stopped working. Right clicking what was a live bookmark no longer shows "reload live bookmark". I tried recreating it, in different profiles, with no luck...
a;skdjfajf;ak

Posts: 17002Joined: July 10th, 2004, 8:44 am
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 9:19 am
daegored4 wrote:From the last thread right before it closed: as of some recently Nightly build on Ubuntu, my live bookmarks stopped working. Right clicking what was a live bookmark no longer shows "reload live bookmark". I tried recreating it, in different profiles, with no luck...
Confirmed on Win32 m-c latest hourly. If you use the 'bookmarks' button the 'reload function' is there on right-click, as well if you open your bookmarks in the sidebar with ctrl+b. It appears in the Library as well. Anyone know if this was 'intentional' ? or perhaps a side-affect of the removal of Micro-summaries.
KWierso
Posts: 8831Joined: May 7th, 2006, 10:29 pmLocation: California
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 9:29 am
Littlemutt wrote:daegored4 wrote:From the last thread right before it closed: as of some recently Nightly build on Ubuntu, my live bookmarks stopped working. Right clicking what was a live bookmark no longer shows "reload live bookmark". I tried recreating it, in different profiles, with no luck...
Confirmed on Win32 m-c latest hourly. If you use the 'bookmarks' button the 'reload function' is there on right-click, as well if you open your bookmarks in the sidebar with ctrl+b. It appears in the Library as well. Anyone know if this was 'intentional' ? or perhaps a side-affect of the removal of Micro-summaries.
[11:25] <KWierso> did the removal of microsummaries break live bookmarks? [11:27] <sheppy> KWierso: I thought live bookmarks were being removed too. Certainly at least some of the interfaces are gone... And here's the microsummaries removal bug, if you want to ask there: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524091
a;skdjfajf;ak

Posts: 17002Joined: July 10th, 2004, 8:44 am
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 9:46 am
@KWierso, I don't have time today to follow up - could you or maybe someone else ? Maybe Alice can check..
daegored4
Posts: 3Joined: May 3rd, 2011, 8:01 am
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 9:54 am
Whoa, where did I miss them removing microsummaries?! That's why those broke too then... damn, we **really** rely on them for our internal IT trackers. Anyone know if there are any extensions in the works to replace them?
XtC4UaLL
Posts: 312Joined: January 12th, 2003, 1:45 pmLocation: Kiel, Germany
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 10:07 am
No Issues here with Livemarks. And they are unrelated to Microsummaries as you can see if you subscribe to a RSS-Feed of you Choice: it's still in the Drop-down, selectable, subscribe-able and the Livemark is reload-able.
MrX1980
Posts: 133Joined: September 21st, 2010, 1:01 amLocation: Germany, NRW, Ruhr district
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 1:09 pm
Hello I opened http://ourbricks.com/viewer/85c448aa4d8 ... 793f219c26 and after a few seconds the nightly crashes: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/ ... d392110503Can someone confirm it? Edit: With 4.0.1 and Aurora it is ok (no crash). Regression?
Last edited by MrX1980 on May 3rd, 2011, 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MainPC: ASRock X99M Extreme4; i7-5820K; 4x4GB DDR4-2400; Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC; 950 Pro 512 GB TestPC: Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro; Athlon 64 Venice 3200+; 2x 1GB MDT DDR-400; Club3D HD4670 AGP Notebook: ASUS K53SV; i5-2410M/HD3000; GeForce 540M 2GB; 2x4GB DDR3-1866: 850 EVO 500 GB
raulm

Posts: 69Joined: December 18th, 2010, 7:47 amLocation: Hunedoara, Romania
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 1:18 pm
Khata.Channel Mlistener not set. Script is busy: Script: http://code4.ourbricks.com/externals/ka ... 550170:282WFM in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 ID:20110413222027 Tested tomorrow in Nightly.
_Dexter_

Posts: 1436Joined: August 30th, 2008, 6:54 pmLocation: Miami
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 1:54 pm
Crashed the latest hourly for me.
Intel i7 Core Quad @ 4.25Ghz | Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus | 12GB PC3-16000 RAM | ASUS HD6970 2GB - 12.3 CATS | ASUS PA246Q IPS 24" LCD 16:10 | OCZ AGILITY-EX SSD SLC | Windows 7 SP1 x64 Ultimate
sbi82
Posts: 44Joined: April 15th, 2010, 8:12 am
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 2:24 pm
Maybe OT in this thread but I don't know where to write it... On this Webgl demo Minefield (latest nightly) is slower than chrome 11, at least on XP. Slower means that where chrome reach 55-60 fps continuosly, minefield stay around 30-35 fps with some hard disk work too at the start of the demo.. Someone can confirm?
_DSM_
Posts: 12Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:16 am
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 3:11 pm
sbi82 wrote:Maybe OT in this thread but I don't know where to write it... On this Webgl demo Minefield (latest nightly) is slower than chrome 11, at least on XP. Slower means that where chrome reach 55-60 fps continuosly, minefield stay around 30-35 fps with some hard disk work too at the start of the demo.. Someone can confirm?
27min-83max and it stayed at 60+ for the most part
Alice0775
Posts: 2765Joined: October 26th, 2007, 11:25 pm
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 3:49 pm
I filed [*] #654590 [Core:JavaScript Engine]-crash [@ js_strtod(JSContext*, unsigned short const*, unsigned short const*, unsigned short const**, double*)] [Win]
alex-the-cat

Posts: 289Joined: March 12th, 2004, 11:34 amLocation: Chicago, IL, USA
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 3:49 pm
sbi82 wrote:Maybe OT in this thread but I don't know where to write it... On this Webgl demo Minefield (latest nightly) is slower than chrome 11, at least on XP. Slower means that where chrome reach 55-60 fps continuosly, minefield stay around 30-35 fps with some hard disk work too at the start of the demo.. Someone can confirm?
care to share your system spec.?
Please Fold! Rage3D is a nice place to start
Omega X

Posts: 8196Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pmLocation: A Parallel Dimension...
Posted May 3rd, 2011, 3:52 pm
Its 60fps here too.
There's hard disk work at the start of the demo because a lot of WebGL demos don't like to load assets before running. The Hard Disk behavior is present for both Nightly and Chrome.
Latest: Firefox/84.0 *ESR/78.6.0 - Mobile/81.1.5 - Thunderbird/78.5.0 Nightly: Nightly/86.0a1 - Mobile/GV 86.0a1 - Daily/85.0a1
Return to Firefox Builds
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
|