MozillaZine

The Official Win32 20110625 builds are out

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
WhtDwrf

User avatar
 
Posts: 332
Joined: March 2nd, 2009, 7:26 am
Location: CTZone, US

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:09 am

Nightly's out:
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110625 Firefox/7.0a1 ID:20110625030743
    CSet: ce10fd5d82c6
Windows NT 5.1 XP SP3; Using latest Firefox & TB, release builds.. and Firefox.beta channel build candidates.
Testing with latest Nightly and Aurora builds.

NVD
 
Posts: 369
Joined: September 17th, 2010, 7:55 am

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:17 am

Azure has landed on mozilla-central, is it in today's nightly or it didn't make it in time?

WhtDwrf

User avatar
 
Posts: 332
Joined: March 2nd, 2009, 7:26 am
Location: CTZone, US

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:19 am

malliz wrote:
dickvl wrote:Does anyone know why this page makes Firefox 4 and later crash (current nightly included)?
http://www.cave-research.org/

If I save the page and open it locally then it doesn't crash.

I got a crash report on that dick
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/ ... db82110625


FWIW:
    It does not seem to crash on Win XP with browser.chrome.favicons;true on latest nightly.
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110625 Firefox/7.0a1 ID:20110625030743

    Edit: OR better yet :shock: :oops: :
    If I just look up on this page ^ this fixed it;
    jlovaas wrote:...
    I'm the webmaster for cave-research.org. Based cor-el's reply to my bug report, I've removed the CRF favicon.ico from the server- feel free to try cave-research.org again to see if you still have the crash issue.
    ...
Last edited by WhtDwrf on June 25th, 2011, 6:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Windows NT 5.1 XP SP3; Using latest Firefox & TB, release builds.. and Firefox.beta channel build candidates.
Testing with latest Nightly and Aurora builds.

WildcatRay

User avatar
 
Posts: 7419
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 7:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:20 am

NVD wrote:Azure has landed on mozilla-central, is it in today's nightly or it didn't make it in time?

Do you have a bug number or changeset ID for it?
Ray

OS'es: 4 computers with Win10 (1703) Pro 64-bit; Current Firefox ESR, Beta, Nightly

pal-moz
 
Posts: 5937
Joined: September 23rd, 2005, 5:40 pm
Location: Tokyo , Japan

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:21 am

deleted.
Last edited by pal-moz on June 25th, 2011, 6:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
[Desktop] Windows 7 Professional (32bit/SP1) / Geforce GTX 660Ti 2GB (350.12) / 4GB RAM

pal-moz
 
Posts: 5937
Joined: September 23rd, 2005, 5:40 pm
Location: Tokyo , Japan

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:22 am

NVD wrote:Azure has landed on mozilla-central, is it in today's nightly or it didn't make it in time?

not in 0625 NIGHTLY.
[Desktop] Windows 7 Professional (32bit/SP1) / Geforce GTX 660Ti 2GB (350.12) / 4GB RAM

pal-moz
 
Posts: 5937
Joined: September 23rd, 2005, 5:40 pm
Location: Tokyo , Japan

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:23 am

WildcatRay wrote:
NVD wrote:Azure has landed on mozilla-central, is it in today's nightly or it didn't make it in time?

Do you have a bug number or changeset ID for it?

48ad4ffc4230 Marco Bonardo — Merge last green changeset from mozilla-inbound to mozilla-central
[Desktop] Windows 7 Professional (32bit/SP1) / Geforce GTX 660Ti 2GB (350.12) / 4GB RAM

WildcatRay

User avatar
 
Posts: 7419
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 7:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:27 am

If you are interested in a build with Azure in it, grab an hourly of changeset 48ad4ffc4230 or later.

http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/p ... 10fd5d82c6
Ray

OS'es: 4 computers with Win10 (1703) Pro 64-bit; Current Firefox ESR, Beta, Nightly

NVD
 
Posts: 369
Joined: September 17th, 2010, 7:55 am

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:29 am

It's ok, I was just wondering if it made it in time. I'll just wait for tomorrow's nightly then.

GTK66
 
Posts: 1896
Joined: May 30th, 2004, 5:20 am

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:47 am

Is there any way to find out what was fixed in this build?

WildcatRay

User avatar
 
Posts: 7419
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 7:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 6:50 am

GTK66 wrote:Is there any way to find out what was fixed in this build?

You can search the pushlog between yesterday's Nightly changeset ID and today's.
Ray

OS'es: 4 computers with Win10 (1703) Pro 64-bit; Current Firefox ESR, Beta, Nightly

WildcatRay

User avatar
 
Posts: 7419
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 7:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 7:55 am

Aurora nightly is out: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0a2) Gecko/20110625 Firefox/6.0a2 ID:20110625042006

C-set: f69cd8f15cdf
Ray

OS'es: 4 computers with Win10 (1703) Pro 64-bit; Current Firefox ESR, Beta, Nightly

Andu

User avatar
 
Posts: 1266
Joined: July 22nd, 2005, 6:58 am

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 8:25 am

Hm does Azure in the current form bring any obvious advantages already? Or will that require some further optimization?

Although I do remember there being talk of serious performance jumps in many scenarios.

UrbenLegend
 
Posts: 307
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 11:12 am

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 9:33 am

ioiokzkz wrote:
UrbenLegend wrote:And why not remove ftp? We see a directory structure so we know that its ftp right? Oh why not remove https as well? We have a favicon that highlights blue or green when there is encryption. Your argument is invalid and a poor attempt to hide the inconsistency that is removing http from urls. Anyways, just a pet peeve easily solved by changing browser.urlbar.trimURLs in about:config.

Removing ftp and https is confusing, you and I both know it'd be better if they're clearly indicated, but http is just so common that it's really okay if we decide not to mention it.
But like you said, there's always a pref so people not used to the change can turn it off, and that's why we love Firefox, isn't it?

PS. I think the main reason they do this is actually, you know, [parity-chrome]™. :mrgreen:


I just don't like the inconsistency that's introduced with the change. Call me OCD, but removing http is not saving that much space, especially when there's so much space left over on the right side of the URL bar anyways. It looks like its just change for the sake of change, like you said [parity-chrome]. I am starting to hate Chrome not because I use it, but because it keeps influencing every other browser with its damned weird inconsistencies.

UrbenLegend
 
Posts: 307
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 11:12 am

Post Posted June 25th, 2011, 9:42 am

WildcatRay wrote:If you are interested in a build with Azure in it, grab an hourly of changeset 48ad4ffc4230 or later.

http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/p ... 10fd5d82c6


So Azure is only implemented for Canvas right? It's not drawing the rest of the webpage or browser chrome just yet?

Return to Firefox Builds


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests