About:Snappy
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: About:Snappy
More reasons to get rid of plugins.
- _Alexander
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: April 1st, 2010, 2:24 pm
- Location: Your augmented reality
Re: About:Snappy
Omega X wrote:More reasons to get rid of plugins.
Care to provide evidence how this is a plugin issue and NOT a Firefox issue?
http://magneticpudding.com/ <- My Blog
i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz / NV 660 / 32GB DDR3 / 1080p LCD / SSD (120 + 180) / W8 ||| Atom N270 / NV ION / 3GB DDR3 / SSD / 1366x768 / W8
i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz / NV 660 / 32GB DDR3 / 1080p LCD / SSD (120 + 180) / W8 ||| Atom N270 / NV ION / 3GB DDR3 / SSD / 1366x768 / W8
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: About:Snappy
In order to have this problem, a windowed plugin has to be on the page.
Windowed plugins are 3rd party attachments that often create problems with the program its attached to. Those programs have to then create safeguards to protect themselves from poor or malicious implementation. Often times, those attachments manage to bypass those protections and cause problems anyway.
The issue described in the bug exists in every browser on the market currently. Even in IE9. Its less pronounced in Chromium but the displacement still exist when you scroll fast enough. To mitigate, you can turn off smooth scrolling. But that only obfuscates the issue as there's not enough frames when scrolling giving the impression that it teleport up/down the page. They could also take a frame of the windowed plugin and scroll that in place of the plugin until the page stops. But that'll only generate another bug entry. In the end, they'll just have to paint the page less when scrolling or speed up the scroll rate to try and match the displacement.
Windowed plugins are 3rd party attachments that often create problems with the program its attached to. Those programs have to then create safeguards to protect themselves from poor or malicious implementation. Often times, those attachments manage to bypass those protections and cause problems anyway.
The issue described in the bug exists in every browser on the market currently. Even in IE9. Its less pronounced in Chromium but the displacement still exist when you scroll fast enough. To mitigate, you can turn off smooth scrolling. But that only obfuscates the issue as there's not enough frames when scrolling giving the impression that it teleport up/down the page. They could also take a frame of the windowed plugin and scroll that in place of the plugin until the page stops. But that'll only generate another bug entry. In the end, they'll just have to paint the page less when scrolling or speed up the scroll rate to try and match the displacement.
- patrickjdempsey
- Posts: 23686
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
- Location: Asheville NC
- Contact:
Re: About:Snappy
15 years of security holes, slow page loads, loading screens, memory hogging, annoying advertisements, keyboard hijacking, UI lockup (even in a separate process! ha!), endless new crashes, tracking mechanisms, unwanted extra developer/helper extensions, and continuous updates that annoy users, fail to register, and bundle unwanted 3rd-party junkware that hijacks searches and adds broken toolbars, and personally I've had it. Plugins have always been a cludgy encumbrance designed to work around media formats with nasty non-user-friendly licenses. A Snappy/Memshrink/Security/Mission(Open Web) priority would be to eliminate the need for plugins where-ever possible IMO.
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
- Grantius
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: June 28th, 2011, 4:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: About:Snappy
patrickjdempsey wrote:15 years of security holes, slow page loads, loading screens, memory hogging, annoying advertisements, keyboard hijacking, UI lockup (even in a separate process! ha!), endless new crashes, tracking mechanisms, unwanted extra developer/helper extensions, and continuous updates that annoy users, fail to register, and bundle unwanted 3rd-party junkware that hijacks searches and adds broken toolbars, and personally I've had it. Plugins have always been a cludgy encumbrance designed to work around media formats with nasty non-user-friendly licenses. A Snappy/Memshrink/Security/Mission(Open Web) priority would be to eliminate the need for plugins where-ever possible IMO.
Agree'd!
Micro gaming box: AMD A10-7800 APU, 8gb RAM M350 ITX case (size of a book), Windows 10/Ubuntu
Tablet/Laptop: Asus Transformer T100, Intel Atom 2GB RAM, Windows 10 x86
Mobile:Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro
Tablet/Laptop: Asus Transformer T100, Intel Atom 2GB RAM, Windows 10 x86
Mobile:Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro
- LoudNoise
- New Member
- Posts: 39900
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 1:45 pm
- Location: Next door to the west
Re: About:Snappy
Unlocked.
There may be context problems.
There may be context problems.
Post wrangler
"Choose between the Food Select Feature or other Functions. If no food or function is chosen, Toast is the default."
"Choose between the Food Select Feature or other Functions. If no food or function is chosen, Toast is the default."
- Zlip792
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: May 7th, 2011, 1:47 pm
- Location: Pakistan
Re: About:Snappy
P1 Snappy related to Tabstrip reflow thingy down: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750417
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: About:Snappy
Any news on OMTC, SuperSnappy etc?
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: About:Snappy
iwod wrote:Any news on OMTC, SuperSnappy etc?
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/GFX/2012-October-15
Supersnappy developer is away until mid November. Last update he wanted to spin up nightlies. Don't know what happened after that.
- sabret00the
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: June 29th, 2004, 8:24 am
- Location: London (UK)
- Contact:
Re: About:Snappy
Does anyone know the bug that fixes the jank caused by notifications?
-
- Posts: 1428
- Joined: February 19th, 2005, 11:22 am
Re: About:Snappy
sabret00the wrote:Does anyone know the bug that fixes the jank caused by notifications?
Although the bug was related to tab closing, I suspect it might be this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750417
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: About:Snappy
Bas just got assigned to the D3D10 OMTC bug. Smells like implementation is on the horizon.
-
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: May 8th, 2008, 9:35 am
- Location: Monterrey/Zacatecas, Mexico
Re: About:Snappy
Could anyone here confirm some major janks I described on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803570 please?
- patrickjdempsey
- Posts: 23686
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 11:43 am
- Location: Asheville NC
- Contact:
Re: About:Snappy
Try disabling IPV6 on the W7 machine.
Tip of the day: If it has "toolbar" in the name, it's crap.
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
What my avatar is about: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/sea-fox/
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: About:Snappy
Apart from OMTC, SuperSnappy, i think the worst Jank that i have experience day to day even with an SSD drive is Flash. The Flash player hangs, slows down the browser. Does anyone know if this is something being worked on from Adobe / Mozilla ?