The Official Win32 20050516 [Trunk] build is out.

0live · Post by **0live** » May 15th, 2005, 12:32 pm

Is anyone else seeing <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291619" title="Context menu "copy image" (not URL) don't work">bug 291619</a> on Windows?

0live · Post by **0live** » May 15th, 2005, 12:45 pm

mconnor wrote:we're possibly spinning 1.1a1 Monday

Peter(6) · Post by **Peter(6)** » May 15th, 2005, 12:47 pm

0live wrote:Is anyone else seeing <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291619" title="Context menu "copy image" (not URL) don't work">bug 291619</a> on Windows?

WFM
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050515 Firefox/1.0+ ID:2005051509

ShareBird · Post by **ShareBird** » May 15th, 2005, 12:47 pm

Did someone notice problems with CloneWindow and bfcache enabled???

.

0live · Post by **0live** » May 15th, 2005, 1:16 pm

That's silly of me, i was trying to paste to a folder instead of an image editor :s

ShareBird · Post by **ShareBird** » May 15th, 2005, 1:25 pm

ShareBird wrote:Did someone notice problems with CloneWindow and bfcache enabled???

.

It WFM with latest trunk...

tongle · Post by **tongle** » May 15th, 2005, 2:09 pm

The version of adblock i was linked to does not work for me on Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050515 Firefox/1.0+

It gets hung up in the EM saying to restart and crap, when restarting doesn't change its status.

oldtimer · Post by **oldtimer** » May 15th, 2005, 4:33 pm

Hey guys, I've had this for the longest but have builds after mine (see sig) incorporated middle-click functionality on typed URLs found in the Address bar drop-down so that they can open in new tabs? Currently, mine can not. Please, do not recommend extensions. I believe this should be done by Firefox on default.

phiw13 · Post by **phiw13** » May 15th, 2005, 4:38 pm

Peter(6) wrote:I need to know the following:

required: win32 trunk build -
ONLY for Win95 and Win 98 !
open: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=182942
and tell me if it looks like
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=183591 ?
(It's sufficient to answer yes or no)

This looks pretty weird (bad) on OS X.
screenshot

There is a visible colour shift compared to older builds (pre0513), and only one column is displayed.
nb. It works correctly in Safari.

Old Mad_Overclocker · Post by **Old Mad_Overclocker** » May 15th, 2005, 5:14 pm

someone have this bug ?

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278488

Rishi M. · Post by **Rishi M.** » May 15th, 2005, 5:30 pm

That bug is maked resolved duplicate.

Robert S. · Post by **Robert S.** » May 15th, 2005, 5:31 pm

Ancestor wrote:1. When installing multiple themes at once (dragging them on TM) two instances of them appear on the list: one normal and one with a different icon and named after the filename. This doesn’t happen when installing them one by one.

#257992[Firefox]-Cannot install multiple themes using drag-and-drop to the EM window [Win]

Ancestor wrote:2. Themes do not disappear from the list when removed during the same session they’ve been installed. I have to close Firefox in order for them to disappear.

Sounds like it can be improved even though as is it works well enough. This of course doesn't apply to a theme if it is in use which does require a restart.

Ancestor wrote:3. When any other theme than default is enabled, the options windows is completely messed up.

The theme needs to be compatible with the trunk... there are several themes that are and there is a thread that lists them in the themes forum.

Rishi M. · Post by **Rishi M.** » May 15th, 2005, 5:37 pm

Yeah, the options and sanitize dialogs will be screwed up on 1.0 themes, because those windows didn't exist in 1.1.

Post by **James** » May 15th, 2005, 6:32 pm

Peter(6) wrote:I need to know the following:

required: win32 trunk build -
ONLY for Win95 and Win 98 !
open: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=182942
and tell me if it looks like
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=183591 ?
(It's sufficient to answer yes or no)
XP - No
win2k - No
winME - No

Win95 - No ... screenshot

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050515 Firefox/1.0+

On Linux - Yes

mcm_ham · Post by **mcm_ham** » May 15th, 2005, 10:23 pm

Does anyone know why Firefox doesn't check the addons.mozilla.org site if the custom rdf update fails?

Wow, there is some nice logging detail in Javascript Console after doing updates. Has that always been there or has it improved with the patch from bug 291790.