Official 0.7 RELEASE CANDIDATES for Windows and Linux
- Jeff_pony
- Moderator
- Posts: 8790
- Joined: January 5th, 2003, 12:38 pm
- Location: (.uk)
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: December 13th, 2002, 9:54 pm
-
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
jodef wrote:In layman's terms what's the difference between official and unofficial release candidates?
The difference is that official ones are built by mozilla.org and unofficial ones aren't.
Exactly what the differences are depends on the build options used by the "unofficial" folks making builds. If an "unofficial" build uses the same compiler and same options as the mozilla.org build, then there won't be any practical difference.
- tseelee
- Posts: 628
- Joined: May 3rd, 2003, 10:34 pm
- Location: Ridgewood, NY
- Contact:
Re: Works well for me but did encounter one strange thing ..
AGSHender wrote:Solution: don't install Flash.
I suffered this faux-solution until I opened IE one too many times to watch the rare Flash animation I do want to view. After that, I went through quite a bit of trouble with installing Flash 6 on FB 0.6.1+ until I saw that I had to create a new FB profile. Then I installed the Click to View Flash (?) extension so I won't see any Flash animation unless I want to.
I have now removed the Flash plugin from IE.
Last edited by tseelee on September 28th, 2003, 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance. - Socrates as quoted in Lives of Eminent Philosophers
- sensemann
- Posts: 755
- Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
- Location: Dresden, Germany
- Contact:
R@F wrote:sensemann wrote:go to Tools - Options.. - Advanced, and try to expand the validation and certificate options. you will see that the first time you try it you'll have to click twice to open it, afterwards it works just fine...
Confirmed. I have seen this on recent nightlies as well. W2K.
yup, me too. I think I've even seen this with Thunderbird if i remember correctly.
- wgianopoulos
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: July 23rd, 2003, 8:15 am
Re: Official 0.7 RELEASE CANDIDATES for Windows and Linux
bengoodger wrote:Testing ASAP is appreciated.
Works fine for me! Perhaps we could get more people to test if there were a MozilaZine article written as there there was for the two Mozilla Release Candidates. You kind of need to know where to look to find this.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: March 14th, 2003, 5:20 pm
Re: Didn't Fonts/Colors move to Options->General
yusufg wrote:I've been using nightlies for a while so I've always seen Fonts/Colors in Options->General. In the 0.7 RC, this is in Options->Web Features
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 Firebird/0.7
If you really want to return Fonts/Colors to Options /General you can do the following:
Rename the Chrome directory in FB to something else and copy the Chrome directory from one of the recent nightlies. To change the version number in Help/About you can drill down into Firebird\chrome\en-US.jar\locale\en-US\global\brand.dtd and change it to your liking.
- djst
- Moderator
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 1:34 am
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
- shadytrees
- Moderator
- Posts: 11743
- Joined: November 30th, 2002, 6:41 am
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: May 14th, 2003, 10:02 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 423
- Joined: June 18th, 2003, 1:02 am
- Location: Grover, Missouri, USA
- Contact:
- Radiowriter
- Posts: 3146
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 7:44 pm
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
Hellmark wrote:I'd be in hog heaven.
Last I heard, humans were frowned upon in hog heaven.
My opinion on Fonts and Colors is put them wherever you want. I never touch them and doubt that many others do. However, now that I've mentioned it, I'm certain the minority will surface.
Sarcasm - Another service I offer.
Firefox 3.0 :: XP
Firefox 3.0 :: XP