Petition to back out patch for Bug# 303806

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Locked
iwod
Posts: 1033
Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm

Post by iwod »

Since it was so urgent i decided to download 07 build ( beta 1 ) to test it out. I find the new "look" actually much better than the old one. It is "clean" and much easier on the eyes.

Then i try out the important issue. How it looks on Classic skin. And it was disxxxxxx....... why? Surely we can have the best of both world?
User avatar
a;skdjfajf;ak
Posts: 17002
Joined: July 10th, 2004, 8:44 am

Post by a;skdjfajf;ak »

BoxerBoi76 wrote:I would also suggest that you let the developers in #Firefox and #Developers on IRC know your feelings regarding this bug as well as in there blogs! They need to understand that the overwelming response is no to this bug and that far more ppl disagree with it then the # of ppl that were using FF prior to this bug on XP luna did with not having FF luna-fied.

BoxerBoi76


Mr Conner already stated earlier today on the IRC #Firefox, if we want to complain, take it elsewhere.
Has the same attitude as the creator... Love it or leave it.
User avatar
Elder Young
Posts: 545
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 8:24 pm

Post by Elder Young »

Can you make the file read only or something similar?
System: Core 2 Quad Q9650, 8GB RAM, Sapphire 5870 Toxic, Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Flash 10.1.53.64, Java 1.6U21 B04
manc39
Moderator
Posts: 2037
Joined: June 17th, 2004, 8:34 am
Location: Manchester, England
Contact:

Post by manc39 »

Most of these XP luna users probably don't even realise this is a bug. I doubt if any of them would've noticed it unless 1.5 gets released with this patch and then they'll realise Firefox didn't look like the rest of their setup.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060712 BonEcho/2.0b1
tongle
Posts: 672
Joined: March 13th, 2004, 3:15 pm

Post by tongle »

I said it once, and I'll say it again.

This bug is bullshit. I'm reopening bug 306827 due to this.
<b><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/f1254114/petition.html">Sign this petition if you want to help spread Firefox</a></b>
old np
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by old np »

Ooh, Thumper's gonna smack all you down when he wakes up.
Elfguy
Posts: 309
Joined: June 27th, 2005, 5:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Elfguy »

I filed 307377 asking for at least an option to switch back to classical menus. Let's see how fast it's set to WONTFIX, tongle's bug took a few minutes.
rschultz2002
Posts: 408
Joined: August 26th, 2005, 9:29 am

Post by rschultz2002 »

I could care less about Thumper. This crap looks like crap on ME.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050907 Firefox/1.4 - Build ID: 2005090706
User avatar
Elder Young
Posts: 545
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 8:24 pm

Post by Elder Young »

np wrote:Ooh, Thumper's gonna smack all you down when he wakes up.


As long as he fixes things after that. ;)
User avatar
jtmal0723
Posts: 385
Joined: April 9th, 2005, 9:10 am
Location: New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by jtmal0723 »

I personally don't mind this. But I am saying this. How about a detector. You know, to detect the OS and theme you are using.... If it detects any other os than winxp, it'll use the old look. If you are using WinXP in classic, it'll use the old look... if you are using winxp with a theme other than classic, then use the new style.

This is something that's hard to code, so meh :P
old np
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by old np »

rschultz2002 wrote:I could care less about Thumper.

So why don't you?
rschultz2002 wrote:This crap looks like crap on ME.

Got screenshots? Because every screenshot I've seen, nothing really looks out of the ordinary. I don't think I'd even notice the change had I not seen that bug.
trainer4 wrote:I personally don't mind this. But I am saying this. How about a detector. You know, to detect the OS and theme you are using.... If it detects any other os than winxp, it'll use the old look. If you are using WinXP in classic, it'll use the old look... if you are using winxp with a theme other than classic, then use the new style.

That's bug 243078, the bug mentionned in the first commend of the bug we're talking about.
User avatar
AmboyGuy
Posts: 3304
Joined: July 6th, 2004, 9:19 am

Post by AmboyGuy »

It appears with the attitude of the devs that it's here to stay.
As was mentioned before, boycott testing and let's see when and what kind of crap beta 2 will look like.
Instead of concentrating on bugs (filenames in Save As, missing custom toolbars, Extension/theme search still searching) they're playing with pixels.
Mozilla/5.0 (Ubuntu; X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1 ID:20111228084953
User avatar
jtmal0723
Posts: 385
Joined: April 9th, 2005, 9:10 am
Location: New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by jtmal0723 »

np wrote:That's bug 243078, the bug mentionned in the first commend of the bug we're talking about.
hmmm... maybe I should really start to read the posts in this thread :-/

AmboyGuy wrote:It appears with the attitude of the devs that it's here to stay.
As was mentioned before, boycott testing and let's see when and what kind of crap beta 2 will look like.
Instead of concentrating on bugs (filenames in Save As, missing custom toolbars, Extension/theme search still searching) they're playing with pixels.
but if you don't test, they'll assume everything's fine when it isn't, and move on.
rschultz2002
Posts: 408
Joined: August 26th, 2005, 9:29 am

Post by rschultz2002 »

No I am not going to post SS of it. People can see for them self what it looks like. I will just slap some theme on it for now.
tongle
Posts: 672
Joined: March 13th, 2004, 3:15 pm

Post by tongle »

com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsLookAndFeel

If anyone is interested on how java handles native rendering (which it does quite well)

And I agree with the boycott.
<b><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/f1254114/petition.html">Sign this petition if you want to help spread Firefox</a></b>
Locked