BlueFyre: W32 2004-03-25 AthlonXP (O2/G7/GL/SSE, .NET 2003)

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Post Reply
User avatar
BlueFyre
Posts: 1985
Joined: February 11th, 2004, 4:33 pm

BlueFyre: W32 2004-03-25 AthlonXP (O2/G7/GL/SSE, .NET 2003)

Post by BlueFyre »

These are all Trunk Builds.

I built Mozilla Firefox from CVS with MSVC++ .NET 2003 using some optimisations.

Optimised for Athlon XP and some newer Durons with SSE (-O2 -G7 -GL -arch:SSE):
http://pryan.org/firefox/BlueFyre/Firef ... GL-SSE.zip (~7.80MB - zip)
The above build will work on systems that support the SSE instruction set ONLY.

[Note] Extracting will make a folder named Firefox

checkout start: Thu Mar 25 06:51:15 PST 2004

I should note that I can't guarantee that these builds will work with Windows 95 (Microsoft has removed Windows 95 as a target platform on their .NET 2003 version of development tools), but they will work with Windows 98/NT4 or better, and probably on Windows 95 too.

You can find a copy of these builds (and my older builds) on pryan's mirror:
http://pryan.org/firefox/BlueFyre

My .mozconfig is as follows:

. $topsrcdir/browser/config/mozconfig
ac_add_options --disable-tests
ac_add_options --disable-debug
ac_add_options --enable-optimize="-O2 -G7 -GL -arch:SSE"
ac_add_options --enable-static
ac_add_options --disable-shared

My builds have the following preference set:
pref("general.useragent.vendorComment", "BlueFyre");

I've included a copy of my .mozconfig in the build folder itself.
For more on what the optimisation switches do see this link:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... _.2f.o.asp
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... _.2f.g.asp
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... ecture.asp

PS: I am using scragz's unofficial branding. (http://scragz.com/tech/mozilla/firefox- ... anding.php)
If you notice this notice you may notice that this notice is not worth noticing.
User avatar
task
Posts: 317
Joined: March 14th, 2004, 9:52 pm
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by task »

testing.. fine for now.. :)
EagleClaw
Posts: 41
Joined: October 23rd, 2003, 8:31 am
Location: Watertown
Contact:

Post by EagleClaw »

VERY smooth as usual


nice job
"Action does not equal Achievement"
User avatar
Swiftdeathz
Posts: 107
Joined: March 5th, 2004, 9:55 pm

Post by Swiftdeathz »

working swell, thanks.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050924 Firefox/1.0.7 (stipe s8v4)
Thunderbird version 1.0.5 (20050711)
WindowsXP SP2, Athlon64 3200+ (Venice), 1.5GB RAM
Smokey
Posts: 274
Joined: December 3rd, 2002, 5:56 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Smokey »

works fine, thanks again
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Firefox/0.9 (MOOX-AV)
Lost User 33597
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by Lost User 33597 »

man ur builds rock
NightlyBuild
Posts: 23
Joined: September 20th, 2003, 8:01 pm
Location: close

Post by NightlyBuild »

Fastest build I've ever used to date...
nice work buddy
User avatar
1o9
Posts: 15
Joined: November 20th, 2003, 12:13 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by 1o9 »

Working good so far!
User avatar
GrailKnight
Posts: 2359
Joined: January 5th, 2004, 5:40 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Post by GrailKnight »

Very nice, very fast, very stable.
Thank you very much.
"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact". - Sherlock Holmes
Smokey
Posts: 274
Joined: December 3rd, 2002, 5:56 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Smokey »

i just have a question: your builds are usually one of the last to get posted, and i was wondering if that affects the build at all, in terms of code, fixes, etc
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Firefox/0.9 (MOOX-AV)
pljones
Posts: 476
Joined: December 28th, 2003, 4:13 am

Post by pljones »

I think that's just when BlueFyre gets to the forum. The build seems to be available ages before the announcement. The current build,
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040326 Firefox/0.8.0+ (BlueFyre)
appears to be missing at least one of the bug fixes in the "official" nightly:
Peter(6) wrote:Fixes:
  1. #236690Help\For Internet Explorer Users displays a blank page

Still looks blank to me. Oh... now it doesn't. Ugh... Strange...
User avatar
task
Posts: 317
Joined: March 14th, 2004, 9:52 pm
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by task »

pljones wrote:
Peter(6) wrote:Fixes:
  1. #236690Help\For Internet Explorer Users displays a blank page

Still looks blank to me. Oh... now it doesn't. Ugh... Strange...


SAME happing here

here also bookmark submenu's patch's are NOT working

some1 can confirm?
Smokey
Posts: 274
Joined: December 3rd, 2002, 5:56 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Smokey »

i thought the bookmark submenu bug was fixed
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Firefox/0.9 (MOOX-AV)
pljones
Posts: 476
Joined: December 28th, 2003, 4:13 am

Post by pljones »

Smokey wrote:i thought the bookmark submenu bug was fixed
Looks fixed to me on WinXP.
Smokey
Posts: 274
Joined: December 3rd, 2002, 5:56 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Smokey »

pljones wrote:
Smokey wrote:i thought the bookmark submenu bug was fixed
Looks fixed to me on WinXP.

yes same here, WFM on XP
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Firefox/0.9 (MOOX-AV)
Post Reply