And I had great results with 2003-01-29, and 2002-12-28, and 2002-11-14. But he wanted the LAST bext Px build, and that's 2003-02-21, IMO.Gyges wrote:ehume wrote:I concur.alanjstr wrote:johnh123 wrote:So what is the last best Px build? I'm about a month old now, but wondering which I should upgrade to.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/phoenix/nigh ... -08-trunk/
I beg to differ, I've had great luck with the 23 January build at http://ftp24moz.newaol.com/pub/phoenix/ ... -08-trunk/
But that's just my experience on my computer.
2003-03-01 build
- ehume
- Posts: 6743
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 12:33 pm
- Location: Princeton, NJ, USA
Firefox: Sic transit gloria mundi.
- nilson
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: February 15th, 2003, 11:55 pm
- Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: February 27th, 2003, 2:59 pm
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
nilson wrote:2003-02-26 works fine for me, but I havent used it that thouroghly though.
That one has the bookmarks in toolbar issue (cosmetic), and I believe some really weird other issues, like some pages somethings displaying wrong sometimes. Also, it sometimes went totally bonkers with its memory usage, using 60M while around 20M would be normal (0.5 release, and other better builds, like 02-21). This on winxp.
Like many others, I'd recommend 02-21. Zero problems with this so far.
Viljo Viitanen
- nilson
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: February 15th, 2003, 11:55 pm
- Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
- Contact:
- Spewey
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 5799
- Joined: January 25th, 2003, 2:06 pm
- Location: St. Paul, Minnes°ta
nilson wrote:ahhh... you can tell i have not used it to thoughly, then. How are the latest builds?
They have problems d/l'ing and run up memory to 60MB and don't always quit when they close.
Don't d/l, watch out for multiple instances if you crash/hang/quit and 20030227 (&-8 I think) can be used. I have avoided Customization of toolbars to play it safe. I could revert, but I'm not.
We are all waiting for a March Windows build but rumor has it the builder is broken.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030227 Phoenix/0.5
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: February 10th, 2003, 8:57 pm
- Location: Slave 1
- Contact:
- SwampFan
- Posts: 178
- Joined: February 25th, 2003, 9:40 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
- Tom Sommer
- Posts: 988
- Joined: January 15th, 2003, 4:46 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Argg come on win32 march builds
Tom Sommer - http://tsn.dk - http://dreamcoder.dk - http://blog.dreamcoder.dk
Thunderbird installer: http://seb.mozdev.org/thunderbird/
Thunderbird installer: http://seb.mozdev.org/thunderbird/
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
IamBobaFett wrote:Oh I dont know i've been happy so far with the Feb 21st 2003 build. I havent upgraded to a newer build because of all the new bugs found in the nightly builds after.
Feb 26 (win me) seems to be running reasonably well except for some duplication in the bookmarks toolbar, and that happens only in windows other than the first one.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: January 18th, 2003, 7:48 am
- Location: Southampton, England
Arctic Dragon wrote:I just noticed that View Page Source doesn't work, though.
2003-03-02/Linux view source WFM. TBE requires a bit of a work round (http://www.mozillazine.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6774) but then is fine.
- AkiAki007
- Posts: 262
- Joined: December 9th, 2002, 3:15 pm
- Location: New York, NY, USA
Gyges wrote:ehume wrote:I concur.alanjstr wrote:johnh123 wrote:So what is the last best Px build? I'm about a month old now, but wondering which I should upgrade to.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/phoenix/nigh ... -08-trunk/
I beg to differ, I've had great luck with the 23 January build at http://ftp24moz.newaol.com/pub/phoenix/ ... -08-trunk/
But that's just my experience on my computer.
That's February...Just in case anyone gets confused.