Weekly best build poll

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
User avatar
calvinweb
Posts: 65
Joined: January 31st, 2003, 9:17 am

Weekly best build poll

Post by calvinweb »

I've seen this suggested, and lot's of people ask the question. Maybe it's possible to run it more frequently.

The idea is to have a poll on what is the best build available (in terms of the build you would most like to use forever).

What's needed to create a poll ?
the one this week would have

* Milestone 0.5
* Build 2002-12-28
* Build 2003-01-31
* Build 2003-02-21
* Build 2003-02-23
1 Build 2003-02-26
4 Build 2003-03-03
* None of the above

The list would be changed every week (or a new poll created).
Last edited by calvinweb on March 4th, 2003, 2:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
me4get
Posts: 82
Joined: December 12th, 2002, 11:48 am

Post by me4get »

Right now my favorite is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030303 Phoenix/0.5
User avatar
RIV@NVX
Posts: 467
Joined: December 24th, 2002, 7:32 am

Post by RIV@NVX »

me4get wrote:Right now my favorite is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030303 Phoenix/0.5


/me seconds that.
Why would you even consider to use the OS that is older and more obsolete than your computer?
See, that's just one of the reasons why I pick Linux.
HW71
Posts: 146
Joined: December 12th, 2002, 3:08 am
Location: Germany

Post by HW71 »

RIV@NVX wrote:/me seconds that.

me, too! 20030303 is a great built at least for me (but I don't use any extensions - just pure PX!)! :)

Major / most annoying bugs for me still in there are #182695 and #184202
old Neil Parks
Moderator
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Re: Weekly best build poll

Post by old Neil Parks »

calvinweb wrote:What's needed to create a poll ?


Polls were banned in most forums because some people thought they were being overdone. You can still create polls in Mozillazine After Dark.

I have progressed from 12/28 to 1/31 to 2/21 to 2/26.

I've read some nice comments about 3/3, but I think I'll wait for the reviews of 3/4 before making the next move.

UPDATE:

Now using March 4, and it looks ok so far.
Last edited by old Neil Parks on March 4th, 2003, 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
thenightfly42
Posts: 983
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 8:03 am

Post by thenightfly42 »

Even if a polls were available, I don't think they'd be useful for this, unless you made a new poll each day. Or allowed people to retract and change their vote as a new build is released.

The current method seems to work well; a thread for each build, and people say what they see different or problematical about it. I use that to decide if I should install a nightly or not. I try to keep as current as possible without losing TBE.
User avatar
SwampFan
Posts: 178
Joined: February 25th, 2003, 9:40 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Post by SwampFan »

Another vote for 20030303 - I've been using it all day without any problems. I had to fix the TBE issue, but otherwise it is a good build.

I think the main advantage this build has over 20030221 is that the Bookmark Context Menus are back. Only main problem I see, however, is that the Bookmark Manager icons (using Qute) are all jumbled together.
User avatar
ehume
Posts: 6743
Joined: November 17th, 2002, 12:33 pm
Location: Princeton, NJ, USA

Post by ehume »

I agree with 2002-12-28 and 2003-02-21, but of the late January builds, I prefer 2003-01-29.

2003-03-03 requires special handling. You must not start with a new profile, at least with Win XP. But check the 2003-03-03 build thread. There are some other issues.

My list of Golden Builds for Windows:

2002-11-14
2002-12-28
2003-01-29
2003-02-21

I can't really recommend a March build yet.
Firefox: Sic transit gloria mundi.
User avatar
willll
Posts: 2577
Joined: November 30th, 2002, 11:39 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by willll »

ehume wrote:You must not start with a new profile, at least with Win XP. But check the 2003-03-03 build thread.
I haven't experienced this?
User avatar
nought
Posts: 125
Joined: March 6th, 2003, 7:10 am
Location: Delft, the Netherlands

11-Mar-2003

Post by nought »

The 11-Mar-2003 built runs perfectly! I like the new Option menu and the browser starts faster and renders pages faster. My sincere compliments to the developers!

[running on win XP]
User avatar
daihard
Folder@Home
Posts: 16633
Joined: November 17th, 2002, 6:27 pm
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Contact:

Post by daihard »

I used 2003-02-21 for a while before switching to 2003-03-04 yesterday. They both seem fairly stable to me.
Kubuntu 8.04 (kernel 2.6.24-25-generic) / KDE 3.5.10
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
User avatar
Tom Sommer
Posts: 988
Joined: January 15th, 2003, 4:46 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tom Sommer »

20030303 is a cool windows build
Dunderklumpen
Posts: 16224
Joined: March 9th, 2003, 8:12 am

Post by Dunderklumpen »

We are using the:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030304 Phoenix/0.5

Wich is the one that seemes to be working best - so far.
User avatar
Toxikk
Posts: 159
Joined: December 1st, 2002, 1:24 pm

Post by Toxikk »

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030312 Phoenix/0.5

all the way. like i said before, this is the best build i have used in months.
old Neil Parks
Moderator
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by old Neil Parks »

Toxikk wrote:Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030312 Phoenix/0.5

all the way. like i said before, this is the best build i have used in months.


Tried it yesterday and it crashed several times. For now, my vote goes to March 4 (Win ME)
Post Reply