Weekly best build poll
- calvinweb
- Posts: 65
- Joined: January 31st, 2003, 9:17 am
Weekly best build poll
I've seen this suggested, and lot's of people ask the question. Maybe it's possible to run it more frequently.
The idea is to have a poll on what is the best build available (in terms of the build you would most like to use forever).
What's needed to create a poll ?
the one this week would have
* Milestone 0.5
* Build 2002-12-28
* Build 2003-01-31
* Build 2003-02-21
* Build 2003-02-23
1 Build 2003-02-26
4 Build 2003-03-03
* None of the above
The list would be changed every week (or a new poll created).
The idea is to have a poll on what is the best build available (in terms of the build you would most like to use forever).
What's needed to create a poll ?
the one this week would have
* Milestone 0.5
* Build 2002-12-28
* Build 2003-01-31
* Build 2003-02-21
* Build 2003-02-23
1 Build 2003-02-26
4 Build 2003-03-03
* None of the above
The list would be changed every week (or a new poll created).
Last edited by calvinweb on March 4th, 2003, 2:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- RIV@NVX
- Posts: 467
- Joined: December 24th, 2002, 7:32 am
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
Re: Weekly best build poll
calvinweb wrote:What's needed to create a poll ?
Polls were banned in most forums because some people thought they were being overdone. You can still create polls in Mozillazine After Dark.
I have progressed from 12/28 to 1/31 to 2/21 to 2/26.
I've read some nice comments about 3/3, but I think I'll wait for the reviews of 3/4 before making the next move.
UPDATE:
Now using March 4, and it looks ok so far.
Last edited by old Neil Parks on March 4th, 2003, 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- thenightfly42
- Posts: 983
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 8:03 am
Even if a polls were available, I don't think they'd be useful for this, unless you made a new poll each day. Or allowed people to retract and change their vote as a new build is released.
The current method seems to work well; a thread for each build, and people say what they see different or problematical about it. I use that to decide if I should install a nightly or not. I try to keep as current as possible without losing TBE.
The current method seems to work well; a thread for each build, and people say what they see different or problematical about it. I use that to decide if I should install a nightly or not. I try to keep as current as possible without losing TBE.
- SwampFan
- Posts: 178
- Joined: February 25th, 2003, 9:40 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
Another vote for 20030303 - I've been using it all day without any problems. I had to fix the TBE issue, but otherwise it is a good build.
I think the main advantage this build has over 20030221 is that the Bookmark Context Menus are back. Only main problem I see, however, is that the Bookmark Manager icons (using Qute) are all jumbled together.
I think the main advantage this build has over 20030221 is that the Bookmark Context Menus are back. Only main problem I see, however, is that the Bookmark Manager icons (using Qute) are all jumbled together.
- ehume
- Posts: 6743
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 12:33 pm
- Location: Princeton, NJ, USA
I agree with 2002-12-28 and 2003-02-21, but of the late January builds, I prefer 2003-01-29.
2003-03-03 requires special handling. You must not start with a new profile, at least with Win XP. But check the 2003-03-03 build thread. There are some other issues.
My list of Golden Builds for Windows:
2002-11-14
2002-12-28
2003-01-29
2003-02-21
I can't really recommend a March build yet.
2003-03-03 requires special handling. You must not start with a new profile, at least with Win XP. But check the 2003-03-03 build thread. There are some other issues.
My list of Golden Builds for Windows:
2002-11-14
2002-12-28
2003-01-29
2003-02-21
I can't really recommend a March build yet.
Firefox: Sic transit gloria mundi.
- nought
- Posts: 125
- Joined: March 6th, 2003, 7:10 am
- Location: Delft, the Netherlands
11-Mar-2003
The 11-Mar-2003 built runs perfectly! I like the new Option menu and the browser starts faster and renders pages faster. My sincere compliments to the developers!
[running on win XP]
[running on win XP]
- daihard
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 6:27 pm
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
- Contact:
- Tom Sommer
- Posts: 988
- Joined: January 15th, 2003, 4:46 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
20030303 is a cool windows build
Tom Sommer - http://tsn.dk - http://dreamcoder.dk - http://blog.dreamcoder.dk
Thunderbird installer: http://seb.mozdev.org/thunderbird/
Thunderbird installer: http://seb.mozdev.org/thunderbird/
-
- Posts: 16224
- Joined: March 9th, 2003, 8:12 am
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm