The best Px Win32 build: 20030317 - 20030323
- DL
- Posts: 24
- Joined: December 18th, 2002, 11:01 am
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
The best Px Win32 build: 20030317 - 20030323
Well, once again.
Vote for your favourite last week's Win32 build on this page: http://members.hostedscripts.com/poll.c ... =DL&poll=2
According to your votes, 20030316 is the best build on week 20030310 - 20030316.
Vote for your favourite last week's Win32 build on this page: http://members.hostedscripts.com/poll.c ... =DL&poll=2
According to your votes, 20030316 is the best build on week 20030310 - 20030316.
the man is dead
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
Re: 20030320
denro wrote:I am having no troubles with the 3/20 version. Have read negatives for later builds. 3/20 seems ready for 0.6 Phoenix
Ditto.
- galapogos
- Posts: 659
- Joined: February 22nd, 2003, 1:41 am
I'm on 3/20 as well, the later versions have been known to be buggy. However, there are still some really irritating bugs yet to be fixed, like the javascript popup not loading bug, the crash on autocomplete bug and the crash on window getting focus bug. The latter is a new one since 3/18 or 3/19 but has yet to be fixed...
-
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 11:26 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
- RIV@NVX
- Posts: 467
- Joined: December 24th, 2002, 7:32 am
seb wrote:If you don't use the popup blocker and the context menu, yeah, you can consider it a good build.RIV@NVX wrote:20030323 is definitly the best imho.
But, PHP download bug is fixed, so it gets my vote
Why would you even consider to use the OS that is older and more obsolete than your computer?
See, that's just one of the reasons why I pick Linux.
See, that's just one of the reasons why I pick Linux.
- STONE POWER D
- Posts: 29
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 2:25 am
- Location: ATLANTIS
- ehume
- Posts: 6743
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 12:33 pm
- Location: Princeton, NJ, USA
- daihard
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 6:27 pm
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
- Contact:
STONE POWER D wrote:im using 03/20 and have had no problems.seems very stable and start up is alot quicker to the last build i used 03/16
I second that. The 2003-03-20 gets my vote.
Kubuntu 8.04 (kernel 2.6.24-25-generic) / KDE 3.5.10
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
- navegante
- Posts: 193
- Joined: February 11th, 2003, 6:38 pm
- Location: Porto , Portugal
- Contact:
RIV@NVX wrote:seb wrote:If you don't use the popup blocker and the context menu, yeah, you can consider it a good build.RIV@NVX wrote:20030323 is definitly the best imho.
But, PHP download bug is fixed, so it gets my vote
There´s a big bug like save image image properties not working on that build, and also displaying big images. Try this one on 20030323
http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/minotau ... notaur.jpg
"The interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship."
Lado Negro da WEB
http://www.ladonegro.net
Lado Negro da WEB
http://www.ladonegro.net
- oliversl
- Posts: 296
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 10:19 pm