I was rather happy with 4-07 then I screwed up..Had to nuke all..
I download 4-11...
"The pick of the litter" UGH..
Type comes out tiny...sites disappear..Weird..I do not like this.
Why is the "talked about preferred build"!
I do not care about silly names..Although annoying...
*Functionality is bliss.*
Windows98SE,OSX, 98FE..And so on..No XP
Better nightly..UGH
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: April 7th, 2003, 9:04 pm
- Location: Killer Dust Bunny heaven
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: January 28th, 2003, 10:31 pm
- Contact:
- xfranky
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: December 5th, 2002, 11:10 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
- daihard
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 6:27 pm
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
- Contact:
XF wrote:If you really care about stability, also 20030304 was a very good one...
I used both 2003-03-04 and 2003-03-20, and AFAICT, they were both very stable. The current one I'm using, 2003-04-01, is good, too, except it has a minor bookmark bug.
Kubuntu 8.04 (kernel 2.6.24-25-generic) / KDE 3.5.10
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: April 7th, 2003, 9:04 pm
- Location: Killer Dust Bunny heaven
- daihard
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 6:27 pm
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
- Contact: