04/23 Win32 Nightly Built is up

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Post Reply
User avatar
Lucky
Posts: 227
Joined: January 28th, 2003, 4:31 am
Location: Essen / Germany
Contact:

04/23 Win32 Nightly Built is up

Post by Lucky »

The TM Bug in the UA is fixed. Can someone confirm that?
User avatar
JaZz0r
Posts: 18
Joined: November 20th, 2002, 9:32 pm
Location: Scottsdale, AZ, USA

Post by JaZz0r »

I can confirm the UA is fixed. Bookmarks manager title is also fixed. Seems to be a fairly stable build!

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030423 Firebird Browser/0.6
<i>Careful, we don't want to learn from this!</i> -Calvin
User avatar
xfranky
Posts: 2059
Joined: December 5th, 2002, 11:10 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by xfranky »

Downloading...
..::XF::..
User avatar
Tom Sommer
Posts: 988
Joined: January 15th, 2003, 4:46 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tom Sommer »

Lol, seems alot faster somehow... had to say it

Textarea bug fixed

Middle-Click fixed

"Web Panels" sticky in bookmarks still broken

Search in Sourcecode still broken
Last edited by Tom Sommer on April 23rd, 2003, 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gena01
Posts: 138
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 6:12 pm
Contact:

Post by Gena01 »

Ah.. much better than yesterday.
- Middle click works on personal toolbar.
- UA stuff is fixed.
- Bookmarks should be working better now. Import/Export should be fixed. (Haven't tried it yet)
- And it seems to be pretty fast and responsive.

Gena01
User avatar
Tom Sommer
Posts: 988
Joined: January 15th, 2003, 4:46 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tom Sommer »

All in all, a good build... seems fast... very fast somehow...
Gena01
Posts: 138
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 6:12 pm
Contact:

Post by Gena01 »

It must be this checkin:
Fix bug 105344 "Memory cache should be based on amount of physical RAM"
This allows the cache to use a lot more memory than previously.
r=saari, sr=darin.


Gena01
User avatar
Tom Sommer
Posts: 988
Joined: January 15th, 2003, 4:46 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tom Sommer »

Maybe, I'm reading 27.320 KB with two tabs open and Orbit as theme...
Dunderklumpen
Posts: 16224
Joined: March 9th, 2003, 8:12 am

Post by Dunderklumpen »

Export of bookmarks does work and several of the items from yesterday also. This one feels a lot better.
I have also tested most of the sites that yesterdays build was reported to have problems with and have been able to access them all - so far.
Last edited by Dunderklumpen on April 23rd, 2003, 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gena01
Posts: 138
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 6:12 pm
Contact:

Post by Gena01 »

This build does use a little bit more memory than before. But it definitely runs faster.

------- Additional Comment #43 From Boris Zbarsky 2003-04-23 03:00 ------- wrote:In case anyone cares, here are some Tp numbers before/after this checkin:

Tbox Before After
btek ~1095 ~1038
luna ~1160 ~1090
silverstone 646 594
monkey ~710 ~660
mecca ~2260 ~2195

So looks like this is working as advertised (a pretty constand 50-70ms speedup
across all tboxes). ;) Note that the only one of these machines that has a RAM
amount listed is mecca and that has 128MB. I suspect they all have at least
128MB of RAM, hence they are all using more memory cache now (our old default
was 4MB).


Gena01
User avatar
Lucky
Posts: 227
Joined: January 28th, 2003, 4:31 am
Location: Essen / Germany
Contact:

Post by Lucky »

And the bookmark bug is fixed too. I mean that bug where the seperators where are on the wrong place in the bookmark manager but in the normal list on the right place. :)
User avatar
thenightfly42
Posts: 983
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 8:03 am

Post by thenightfly42 »

There's a bunch of checkins today related to "dropping folder group support". Could someone tell me what folder group support was? Just curious.
Gena01
Posts: 138
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 6:12 pm
Contact:

Post by Gena01 »

thenightfly42 wrote:There's a bunch of checkins today related to "dropping folder group support". Could someone tell me what folder group support was? Just curious.


I guess they dropped support for the old way of handling groups of bookmarks. When Phoenix was created they forked the bookmarks code and created a new way of groupping bookmarks. But they had the old code in place for backwards compatibility I guess. Now they dropped the old code, since it's not relevant anymore.

At least that's how I see it.

Gena01
seb
Posts: 1578
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 11:26 pm
Location: Paris, France
Contact:

Post by seb »

Tom Sommer wrote:"Web Panels" sticky in bookmarks still broken
It's not broken.
It's just not finished.
User avatar
Tom Sommer
Posts: 988
Joined: January 15th, 2003, 4:46 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tom Sommer »

seb wrote:
Tom Sommer wrote:"Web Panels" sticky in bookmarks still broken
It's not broken.
It's just not finished.
I see, is there a tracker?
Post Reply