Inbox grows without limit

Discussion of general topics about Mozilla Thunderbird
CurtC
Posts: 212
Joined: November 27th, 2003, 8:19 am

Post by CurtC »

A couple of days ago, my Inbox would have to get "indexed" every time TB started, which would take a few minutes. I created a temp subfolder, moved all the Inbox messages into that, then tried compacting the Inbox (it didn't even seem to try), and the Inbox was still over 100 MB and would still spend minutes indexing it upon startup. So with all the messages out of it, I closed TB, deleted the Inbox file, then created a fresh zero-byte file called "Inbox" (I used Notepad to do so), then started TB and moved all my messages from the temp back into Inbox, and now everything works just fine.
User avatar
Freee!!
Posts: 15562
Joined: January 28th, 2005, 5:52 am
Location: Home, with my son!
Contact:

Post by Freee!! »

joshlitt wrote:But I'd really prefer to see if this bug fixed (though I can't find specific reference to others having encountered it). There's clearly a locking issue with mailbox access between the compaction and other operations.

To many entries will do that to you.
User avatar
Squirle
Posts: 417
Joined: April 14th, 2005, 3:28 pm

Post by Squirle »

I know this thread isn't all that new, but I just recently realized that my IMAP Inbox does the same thing. The Inbox is at 71Mb, but on the server I only have 9Mb.

Selecting not to download messages for offline viewing and then deleting the Inbox and Inbox. msf as suggested, did the trick. The Inbox won't reappear as it's only used for offline viewing it seems. When I once again selected to download for offline viewing, the Inbox was back, but this time the size was the same as on the server so it is obvious that messages downloaded for offline viewing are rarely/never deleted by either delete/empty trash/compact.

So as it seems, in order to use the Offline viewing feature, which I think is very convienient, requires regular deletion of the Inbox. Not that much work really as all it takes is deleting two files with TB shut down and then restart it again. The Inbox will be recreated automatically and the mail will be downloaded again from the server. Still, it's one of those little details that turns into a nuiscance eventually. And I'm guessing from what I've read on this forum that my e-mail load is fairly low and the rate at which my Offline Inbox grows is relatively slow. I can imagine that people who gets loads of mail everyday, and have the Offline viewing enabled, will have a very rapidly growing Inbox. Many probably without even knowing it.

So, I agree with joshlitt that fixing this bug would not be a bad idea. Especially if TB hopes to get businesses to use the client for e-mail.

That said, TB is the best e-mail client I've ever had. Guess I'm expecting perfection from it because of that :).
User avatar
Branstrom
Posts: 97
Joined: March 16th, 2004, 9:45 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by Branstrom »

Right now I got a nstmp folder in TB. How do I get rid of it? Do we really have to move all the mail to a different location all the time? Why can't TB handle such a basic thing a BIG inbox? :/
gstretch
Posts: 18
Joined: February 24th, 2004, 3:32 pm

is this a bug?

Post by gstretch »

Has this been identified as a bug, and if so, is there any promise to get it fixed?

I was popping messages off of a mailbox with about 150MB messages; it failed several times to get all of the mail at once, and after a number of such attempts, I dumped the Inbox to a temp folder, only to find the empty Inbox with a size of more than 350MB! This is a very serious defect.
User avatar
Squirle
Posts: 417
Joined: April 14th, 2005, 3:28 pm

Post by Squirle »

I searched through the reported bugs and found this one that to me seemed the most fitting https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289840. If other people have this problem, maybe a few more comments will make something happen. It's still listed as unconfirmed.

Maybe they're not related at all, but the first comment made it seem that way to me. Maybe a separate bug should be reported?
gstretch
Posts: 18
Joined: February 24th, 2004, 3:32 pm

Post by gstretch »

Squirl wrote:I searched through the reported bugs and found this one that to me seemed the most fitting https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289840. If other people have this problem, maybe a few more comments will make something happen. It's still listed as unconfirmed.

Maybe they're not related at all, but the first comment made it seem that way to me. Maybe a separate bug should be reported?


I don't think the original report in 289840 is targetting this problem; however, the two additional comments are very pertinent. My company is next door, and maybe I should just knock on their door and yell at them. ;-)
User avatar
Squirle
Posts: 417
Joined: April 14th, 2005, 3:28 pm

Post by Squirle »

gstretch wrote:I don't think the original report in 289840 is targetting this problem; however, the two additional comments are very pertinent.


Well the second comment is mine, so yes ;). But you may be right about the original bug. Like I wrote, it was the comment that made me think it fit to this problem more than the bug report itself. I know very little about the bug filing processes so I don't know if that means nothing will happen with the bug. So if anyone feel up to making a new 'real' bug report, please do so. I'll comment that one instead :).

gstretch wrote:My company is next door, and maybe I should just knock on their door and yell at them. Wink


That sounds like a good plan too :D.
yoram
Posts: 3
Joined: May 21st, 2005, 10:11 am

Compacting doesn't help

Post by yoram »

Hello y'all: I use IMAP but download certain folders to my local drive. I've compacted my inbox, but my inbox file (in my ImapMail profile folder) is still 1.4 gigs. I know this shouldn't be because I can check the size of my inbox on my domain server and it's only 300 megs. I've compacted the inbox, I've emptied the trash, I've even compacted the folders using the XP utility. No luck.

I'm tempted to follow the advice I've seen elsewhere about deleting the inbox and inbox.msf files, but it would be great to have some assurance that this won't lead me astray...

Thanks!
User avatar
Daifne
Moderator
Posts: 123071
Joined: July 31st, 2005, 9:17 pm
Location: Where the Waters Meet, Wisconsin

Post by Daifne »

yoram,
Please start a new topic. This one is over two years old and, because of that and different versions of Thunderbird, not to mention that you are using IMAP, your question is not related to this topic.
mini7boy
Posts: 3
Joined: October 16th, 2009, 3:10 pm

Re: Inbox grows without limit

Post by mini7boy »

I have paid the price for allowing my Outlook Express Inbox and Sent files to grow to enormous sizes. They have grown to the point where the compaction for these folders fails every time, usually with the loss of some emails in these folders. I had hoped that this was an issue with Outlook Express and that a switch to another more robust email system would allow me to manage and downsize these folders without losing further emails.

I have installed Thunderbird and noticed that Thunderbird will Import my Outlook Express emails. However, I am wondering if I will just be moving the problem from one place to another.

It looks as though each of my Inbox and Sent folders has reached a size of about 1GB. The Inbox is slightly larger and the Sent is slightly smaller than 1 GB.

A couple of questions come to mind:

1) Will Thunderbird be able to successfully import such large folders individually?
2) If the import is successful, will I then be able to move Inbox emails to other folders and then delete them from Inbox and in so doing make the Inbox smaller?
3) How soon will Thunderbird encourage or force me to compact this Inbox(before or after I have downsized it)?
4) Is this import + downsize scheme viable or will it collapse under the huge sizes of the Inbox and Sent folders?

5) After my email folders are successfully imported into Thunderbird, will these emails no longer be accessible by Outlook Express?

Thanks for any help you can lend.
User avatar
Daifne
Moderator
Posts: 123071
Joined: July 31st, 2005, 9:17 pm
Location: Where the Waters Meet, Wisconsin

Re: Inbox grows without limit

Post by Daifne »

mini7boy,
This topic is from 2004. That makes it five years old and very out of date. Start your own topic about your problem. I'm locking this one so that it will stay in it's grave from now on.
Locked