2003-06-03 Windows, Linux and OSX builds Now Available

Discussion about official Mozilla Thunderbird builds
User avatar
tolremeno
Posts: 1596
Joined: March 16th, 2003, 7:37 pm
Location: Tennessee

Post by tolremeno »

willll wrote:I'm still getting <a href="http://users.rcn.com/levines5/tuberculosis.png">this problem</a>. Its easy to make it go away, but i comes again as soon as I start thunderbird again.

i've seen that before, but it's been quite a few builds back. bizarre.
tolremeno - still a *bird lover
Sailfish
Posts: 5681
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 4:58 pm

Post by Sailfish »

willll wrote:I'm still getting <a href="http://users.rcn.com/levines5/tuberculosis.png">this problem</a>. Its easy to make it go away, but i comes again as soon as I start thunderbird again.

Try deleting the XUL.mfl in your profile's salt folder and restarting.
User avatar
willll
Posts: 2577
Joined: November 30th, 2002, 11:39 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by willll »

Sailfish wrote:
willll wrote:I'm still getting <a href="http://users.rcn.com/levines5/tuberculosis.png">this problem</a>. Its easy to make it go away, but i comes again as soon as I start thunderbird again.

Try deleting the XUL.mfl in your profile's salt folder and restarting.
I have already tried that numerous times, and it always reappears. I have also discovered other methods of making it temporarily disappear. btw, its slt, not salt.
TrueDis
Posts: 25
Joined: May 28th, 2003, 1:37 am

Post by TrueDis »

Tom Sommer wrote:

Code: Select all

XML Parsing Error: unclosed token Location: http://phoenity.com/bird/ Line Number 5, Column 46:</html> ---------------------------------------------^


Gotta load it in IE :-(
Sailfish
Posts: 5681
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 4:58 pm

Post by Sailfish »

willll wrote:
Sailfish wrote:
willll wrote:I'm still getting <a href="http://users.rcn.com/levines5/tuberculosis.png">this problem</a>. Its easy to make it go away, but i comes again as soon as I start thunderbird again.

Try deleting the XUL.mfl in your profile's salt folder and restarting.
I have already tried that numerous times, and it always reappears. I have also discovered other methods of making it temporarily disappear.

okay then, good luck on finding out what it is...
willll wrote:btw, its slt, not salt.

I believe it's derived from, this.
gdeka
Posts: 79
Joined: April 25th, 2003, 1:24 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by gdeka »

willll wrote:I'm still getting <a href="http://users.rcn.com/levines5/tuberculosis.png">this problem</a>. Its easy to make it go away, but i comes again as soon as I start thunderbird again.


I have seen something similar in firebird - when i try to add a toolbar button for a button that does not have an icon it does it. I was using Trivial (adds extra buttons) but becasue the theme dosent support it i get that. Might help. Try removing it with the customise toolbar
uggi
Posts: 218
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 1:53 am
Location: Finland

Post by uggi »

It would be nice if Thunderbird would tell me which one of my several accounts doesn't support secure authentication, instead of just referring to "server".
User avatar
DizzyWeb
Posts: 637
Joined: March 27th, 2003, 9:56 am

Post by DizzyWeb »

gdeka wrote:
willll wrote:I'm still getting <a href="http://users.rcn.com/levines5/tuberculosis.png">this problem</a>. Its easy to make it go away, but i comes again as soon as I start thunderbird again.


I have seen something similar in firebird - when i try to add a toolbar button for a button that does not have an icon it does it. I was using Trivial (adds extra buttons) but becasue the theme dosent support it i get that. Might help. Try removing it with the customise toolbar

I'm still having the same problem with the Phoenity theme in Firebird. The Manage Bookmarks dialog has it.
The author can never, in no way, be held responsible for any harm caused, mental or physical, by reading this post.
rafo
Posts: 2
Joined: March 4th, 2003, 6:45 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Cannot start the 2006-06-03 Linux build

Post by rafo »

I tried to download, bunzip2 and untar the 2003-06-03 Linux build to my Red hat 8.0 machine. Having prepended the binaries directory to my PATH I tried typing `thunderbird' and got this:

(thunderbird-bin:20651): Gdk-WARNING **: gdkdrawable-x11.c:787 drawable is not a pixmap or window

Not sure if this is a RedHat problem, or me not doing the right things, or a real problem with the 2006-06-03 build. BTW, the Win32 builds look real nice which is why I was tempted to try it on Linux too.
User avatar
peterlairo
Posts: 41
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 6:15 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 2003-06-03 Windows, Linux and OSX builds Now Available

Post by peterlairo »

mscott wrote:6) the MNG image decoder is no longer part of the build. The throbber has been converted to an animated GIF. Thanks to Pavlov for providing the new animated gifs. This allows us to save over 300K by not including the decoder.


Saves 300k on my 40+ GB hard drive. Whoop-de-doo. :-(
Regards,
Peter Lairo
zoidberg
Posts: 3
Joined: May 30th, 2003, 7:43 am

Build for Debian Woody?

Post by zoidberg »

Hi,
does anyone know where to download a build that runs with Debian Woody? I still use the May 4 build, and kind of feel that i miss out on something...

Thanks

Zoidi
User avatar
willll
Posts: 2577
Joined: November 30th, 2002, 11:39 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by willll »

gdeka wrote:Try removing it with the customise toolbar
I've done that. It removes it only temporarily.
User avatar
RAF
Moderator
Posts: 12609
Joined: November 5th, 2002, 2:19 pm
Location: .nl

Re: 2003-06-03 Windows, Linux and OSX builds Now Available

Post by RAF »

peterlairo wrote:Saves 300k on my 40+ GB hard drive. Whoop-de-doo. :-(


I guess on dial-up it could be(come) an issue if you test Firebird and Thunderbird nightlies.
TrueDis
Posts: 25
Joined: May 28th, 2003, 1:37 am

Post by TrueDis »

So, about those icons ...

http://www.phoenity.com/bird/ (doesn't seem to render right in mozilla)
sunnydayjj
Posts: 7
Joined: December 2nd, 2002, 7:19 am

Re: 2003-06-03 Windows, Linux and OSX builds Now Available

Post by sunnydayjj »

peterlairo wrote:Saves 300k on my 40+ GB hard drive. Whoop-de-doo. :-(


Could be mistaken here, but I think it saves 300k from your memory when the app is loaded. Still.... not really worth it IMO.
Post Reply