MozillaZine

towards Thunderbird 1.0 ...

Discussion about official Mozilla Thunderbird builds
sensemann

User avatar
 
Posts: 755
Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany

Post Posted November 29th, 2004, 7:14 am

"real life" has been consuming waay to much of my precious online time ;)

I'm back (kind of), so I'm gonna update this graph today or tomorrow. be sure to check back!
: sensemann.com :
.:: Extensions :.
.:: Themes :.

Flinx

User avatar
 
Posts: 163
Joined: May 17th, 2004, 9:07 pm
Location: Toronto, ON Canada

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 8:04 am

Image

Drat! It is that evil "real life" again! I wish we could get rid if it! ;)
...Going to play FarmVille ...At least my Black sheep love me.
Scratch that... The crops are wilted, the fruit are rotting on the trees and the sheep have run away.
Toronto International Film Festival

sasquatch
 
Posts: 6022
Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 8:08 am

11/17 is looking a little old. Isn't 1.0 due out soon? I imagine the lines have changed a lot since this graph.

sensemann

User avatar
 
Posts: 755
Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 8:56 am

here's the update!
: sensemann.com :
.:: Extensions :.
.:: Themes :.

davewave
 
Posts: 40
Joined: September 7th, 2003, 11:29 pm

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 11:46 am

Thunderbird 1.0 really needs a splash screen on startup!

FoobsZ

zachariah

User avatar
 
Posts: 586
Joined: September 30th, 2003, 12:44 pm
Location: Earth

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 12:22 pm

wow, just look at those lines!!

Help MozillaZine: Donate! or Buy Something!

batboy3500

User avatar
 
Posts: 28
Joined: June 20th, 2004, 6:37 pm
Location: mildura, victoria, australia

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 12:41 pm

davewave wrote:Thunderbird 1.0 really needs a splash screen on startup!

FoobsZ


no. it really doesn't need that sort of crap.

fishbert

User avatar
 
Posts: 941
Joined: November 29th, 2002, 12:02 am

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 9:59 pm

sensemann wrote:here's the update!
Huzzah cache!
...made me think you were just being a wise-ass. =)

BenneJezzerette

User avatar
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: November 1st, 2004, 1:47 am
Location: Ghost in the Machine

Post Posted December 1st, 2004, 11:37 pm

Hope its as good as todays RC1 is. Will continue to DL the Nightlies if they are available and report any issues if need be, but so far this is a very stable build for it.

<li> Thunderbird version 1.0RC1 (20041201)

Looks pretty good from here.
Vista Home Premium 64 AMD 9950 Quad Core + 8GB DDR2 1066 1x500GB 1X750GB Partitioned 1X1TB MSI GTX260 896
Firefox Safe Browsing - Pocomail Safe E-Mail from Script Kitties
True Internet Surfing + E-Mail not Junk

ivand67
 
Posts: 79
Joined: July 3rd, 2004, 4:52 pm

Post Posted December 3rd, 2004, 9:37 pm

gaspeer wrote:
sulla wrote:Hi All!

If somebody posts a "shit" here, why on earth replace it by "{bleep}"?
Where the hell are we?

sulla for free speach!


Where are we?? We're in a PUBLIC forum, not a private discussion group.
And in a public forum, you should have enough class not to use gratuitous
profanity. If the moderators choose to "bleep" out profanity because some
people are offended, then what's the problem with that?

Gary Speer


Why would anyone be offended in the first place?

sasquatch
 
Posts: 6022
Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am

Post Posted December 3rd, 2004, 10:03 pm

Because it is profanity. Pretty simple. If the owners of this BBS decide they want to uphold certain standards of decency, they have that right since they pay the bills.

fishbert

User avatar
 
Posts: 941
Joined: November 29th, 2002, 12:02 am

Post Posted December 4th, 2004, 11:55 pm

ivand67 wrote:
gaspeer wrote:
sulla wrote:Hi All!

If somebody posts a "shit" here, why on earth replace it by "{bleep}"?
Where the hell are we?

sulla for free speach!
Where are we?? We're in a PUBLIC forum, not a private discussion group.
And in a public forum, you should have enough class not to use gratuitous
profanity. If the moderators choose to "bleep" out profanity because some
people are offended, then what's the problem with that?

Gary Speer

Why would anyone be offended in the first place?
Because some people don't defecate, and they get very upset when others mention bodily waste they cannot themselves produce.

sensemann

User avatar
 
Posts: 755
Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany

Post Posted December 7th, 2004, 11:13 am

Here we go: the last update:

Image
: sensemann.com :
.:: Extensions :.
.:: Themes :.

batboy3500

User avatar
 
Posts: 28
Joined: June 20th, 2004, 6:37 pm
Location: mildura, victoria, australia

Post Posted December 7th, 2004, 4:20 pm

well done senseman. these graphs look great and you did a fine job keeping them up-to-date. what program do you use to produce them?

sasquatch
 
Posts: 6022
Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am

Post Posted December 7th, 2004, 6:45 pm

Did you ever do these graphs for Firefox or Mozilla? I seem to remember you might have done one, but I may be mistaken.

Return to Thunderbird Builds


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest