Consensus on 2.53.13
- Peter Creasey
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: October 26th, 2007, 2:32 pm
- Location: Texas
Consensus on 2.53.13
I've seen some problems mentioned with SeaMonkey 2.53.13.
What is the consensus? Should I upgrade my Windows 10 SeaMonkey 32-bit from 2.53.12 to 2.53.13?
Thanks for any advice.
What is the consensus? Should I upgrade my Windows 10 SeaMonkey 32-bit from 2.53.12 to 2.53.13?
Thanks for any advice.
Last edited by Peter Creasey on July 25th, 2022, 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
. . . . . . . . . . Pete
-
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: July 25th, 2011, 8:11 am
- Location: Poland
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
You have 64-bit Windows OS. Uninstall 32-bit SeaMonkey and install 64-bit SeaMonkey.Peter Creasey wrote:What is the consensus? Should I upgrade my Windows 10 SeaMonkey 32-bit from 2.53.12 to 2.53.13?
--
- Peter Creasey
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: October 26th, 2007, 2:32 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
Thanks for the response.
My Windows 64-bit OS and 32-bit SeaMonkey have worked fine. I'm loath to change things if they aren't a problem.
How risky is it to uninstall 32-bit SeaMonkey and install 64-bit SeaMonkey?
My Windows 64-bit OS and 32-bit SeaMonkey have worked fine. I'm loath to change things if they aren't a problem.
How risky is it to uninstall 32-bit SeaMonkey and install 64-bit SeaMonkey?
. . . . . . . . . . Pete
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: December 15th, 2015, 1:20 pm
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
> How risky is it to uninstall 32-bit SeaMonkey and install 64-bit SeaMonkey?
You might need to redo setting it as default via the Windows Defauot apps settings. That is it about.
FRG
You might need to redo setting it as default via the Windows Defauot apps settings. That is it about.
FRG
- Peter Creasey
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: October 26th, 2007, 2:32 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
Thanks again.
Is there a problem with sticking with SM 32-bit 2.53.13?
Is there a problem with sticking with SM 32-bit 2.53.13?
. . . . . . . . . . Pete
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
Does it work for you?
And don't be so averse to updating a stable product - as SeaMonkey is.
Back up & go for it.
(Firefox is a different animal, though for most even they can probably update without too much heartache :evilgrin:.)
And don't be so averse to updating a stable product - as SeaMonkey is.
Back up & go for it.
(Firefox is a different animal, though for most even they can probably update without too much heartache :evilgrin:.)
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
- Peter Creasey
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: October 26th, 2007, 2:32 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
Is a "backup" just preserving a copy of the profile folder? If not, how is it done?
Any special instructions on the uninstall process?
Thanks.
Any special instructions on the uninstall process?
Thanks.
. . . . . . . . . . Pete
- Snake4
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: December 27th, 2017, 4:03 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
might as well wait for 2.53.14 IMO
why dont you run the Portable version to test it out before you upgrade over the top of your .12 version to findout the problems yourself Peter
why dont you run the Portable version to test it out before you upgrade over the top of your .12 version to findout the problems yourself Peter
Last edited by Snake4 on July 25th, 2022, 5:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: November 13th, 2004, 7:03 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Consensur on 2.53.13
I've been using .13 for 2 weeks now and no issues.
If you like 32-bit, stay with it, but I'd suggest considering going to 64-bit if you have more than 4GB RAM in your system.
If you like 32-bit, stay with it, but I'd suggest considering going to 64-bit if you have more than 4GB RAM in your system.
- Peter Creasey
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: October 26th, 2007, 2:32 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Consensus on 2.53.13
I have plenty of RAM. As a former IBM programmer/system analyst (long ago), I just have a reluctance to change something that is working well...especially when I can ill afford unexpected difficulties.
The dialogue in this thread has been constructive, at least for me.
Many thanks to everyone.
The dialogue in this thread has been constructive, at least for me.
Many thanks to everyone.
. . . . . . . . . . Pete
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: August 3rd, 2022, 8:42 am
Re: Consensus on 2.53.13
after login, etrade.com header is now blank, UA issue? mine is set at Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0
- luk3Z
- Posts: 7
- Joined: September 14th, 2006, 12:19 pm
- Location: Poland
Re: Consensus on 2.53.13
If something is working well then there is no need to change that state. That's why I migrated from W10 to W7 (previously XP to W10).Peter Creasey wrote:I have plenty of RAM. As a former IBM programmer/system analyst (long ago), I just have a reluctance to change something that is working well...especially when I can ill afford unexpected difficulties.
The dialogue in this thread has been constructive, at least for me.
Many thanks to everyone.
SM 2.53.x + Iceape-UXP/2.49.4 build by Roytam1 (for Windows 2k/XP & later rv:52.0) + BNavigator/0.9.8298a1