SeaMonkey without Lightning not worth installing
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: SeaMonkey without Lightning not worth installing
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 14404
- Joined: May 3rd, 2007, 7:40 am
- Location: US
Re: SeaMonkey without Lightning not worth installing
This only checked in for comm-central so far, thus shouldn't affect any release or beta version (and hopefully will be sorted out until SM 2.21 goes into the release channel).
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: March 12th, 2015, 12:30 am
Re: SeaMonkey without Lightning not worth installing
For those searching for solution to current SM and Lightning incompatibilities (since this thread comes up first in Google), see viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2927825 (SeaMonkey 2.33.1 and Lightning 3.8 Calendar Problem)
- DanRaisch
- Moderator
- Posts: 127240
- Joined: September 23rd, 2004, 8:57 pm
- Location: Somewhere on the right coast
Re: SeaMonkey without Lightning not worth installing
Thanks for your report but you've replied to a thread that's been dead for two years.
Locking this due to the age of the original posts.
Locking this due to the age of the original posts.