SeaMonkey security

Discussion of general topics about Seamonkey
Post Reply
User avatar
Peter Creasey
Posts: 1342
Joined: October 26th, 2007, 2:32 pm
Location: Texas

SeaMonkey security

Post by Peter Creasey »

Someone tells me that "SeaMonkey is the equivalent of Thunderbird 52 and Thunderbird is currently at 68.3". His implication is that SM email has significant security exposure.

Any thoughts on this, please?

Thanks.
. . . . . . . . . . Pete
kerft
Posts: 585
Joined: January 30th, 2019, 9:38 am

Re: SeaMonkey security

Post by kerft »

Many security backports (patches taken from other newer browsers, or created) have been done in Seamonkey 2.49.5 and all the versions since 2.49. Is it perfect, maybe not, but I have not heard of any user mentioning getting a virus.

Also, as used as an email client (not a browser), javascript can be turned off, and in that case it is very unlikely for even an ancient version to have a usable security hole. Showing a plain text email for example without script it is very unlikely for a bug to exist that could compromise you.
Anonymosity
Posts: 8779
Joined: May 7th, 2007, 12:07 pm

Re: SeaMonkey security

Post by Anonymosity »

If you read your mail as plain text, you are pretty safe.
User avatar
Peter Creasey
Posts: 1342
Joined: October 26th, 2007, 2:32 pm
Location: Texas

Re: SeaMonkey security

Post by Peter Creasey »

I need to see the graphics in mail that is received. My anti-malwire processor supposedly checks the email and provides virus-free assurances (for whatever that is worth).
. . . . . . . . . . Pete
Post Reply