This is not a suggestion but a simple question.
Why mozilla is still using "bookmarks.html" ?
Yes, it is useful when I check the bookmarks.
On the other hand, it is not useful when I try to read the html source.
And Mozilla and Phoenix also seem to have difficulty in reading bookmarks.html.
Bookmarks data is a tree, then we should use .RDF ?
In addition, userChrome.css and userContent.css are OK, but user.js and prefs.js are actually data collection.
And leaves of the pref tree. then we should .......?
Bookmarks.rdf
-
Torisugari
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 8:34 pm
- Location: Kyoto, Nippon (GMT +9)
- Contact:
Bookmarks.rdf
Thank you.
-
Alex Bishop
- mozillaZine Admin
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 3:18 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Bookmarks.rdf
Torisugari wrote:Bookmarks data is a tree, then we should use .RDF ?
That's <a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177886">bug 177886</a>.
Alex
-
Torisugari
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 8:34 pm
- Location: Kyoto, Nippon (GMT +9)
- Contact:
