Galeon or Phoenix??

Composer, ChatZilla and other Mozilla applications, along with Netscape, Galeon, K-Meleon and other products.
Post Reply
tirantloblanc
Posts: 7
Joined: November 28th, 2002, 10:46 am

Galeon or Phoenix??

Post by tirantloblanc »

Which one is faster, in your opinion?
User avatar
WinterWolf
Posts: 74
Joined: November 28th, 2002, 10:25 pm

They use the same core

Post by WinterWolf »

But, Pheonix is a little more bleeding edge, so i think Pheonix.
User avatar
aleejooo
Posts: 207
Joined: December 21st, 2002, 12:00 pm

Re: They use the same core

Post by aleejooo »

WinterWolf wrote:But, Pheonix is a little more bleeding edge, so i think Pheonix.


I think the same way, also Galeon has much more complicated interface, even more than Mozilla with all the visible toolbars.
Learn from the mistakes of others. You can't live long enough to make them all yourself.
- A wise bathroom wall.
phredx
Posts: 16
Joined: November 13th, 2002, 10:41 am
Contact:

a point for Galeon

Post by phredx »

Galeon is the choice of web browser for GNOME Office, and will thus certainly be worth a look (if by default, in some cases) for a significant number of GNU/Linux users. Once the GNOME 2 build is finished, it should be even more worthwhile.
aab
Posts: 252
Joined: November 18th, 2002, 11:59 am
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Contact:

galeon

Post by aab »

Galeon is faster.
User avatar
eck
Posts: 2
Joined: December 26th, 2002, 1:58 am
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Contact:

Post by eck »

They feel about the same to me, and I just noticed Galeon taking up a bit more memory than Phoenix was, with approximately the same content open. I'm back to using Galeon because the crash-recover feature actually *works*.

I'm really missing a lot of the Phoenix extensions, though: Nuke Image, Tab Extensions, even StumbleUpon. If only the Tab Extensions crash-recover feature would work!

The one thing I like a lot in Galeon, that's much faster than the equivalent in Phoenix, is easily migrating tabs between windows.
User avatar
Radiowriter
Posts: 3146
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 7:44 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Post by Radiowriter »

But, you have to have Mozilla installed to use Galeon. So is it just a "faceplate" (ala NeoPlanet in Windows)? I'm trying to get rid of some of the excess on my machine. Anyone know how to remove Konqueror?
Sarcasm - Another service I offer.
Firefox 3.0 :: XP
cdn
Posts: 999
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 5:47 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by cdn »

remove KDE
User avatar
Radiowriter
Posts: 3146
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 7:44 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Post by Radiowriter »

cdn wrote:remove KDE

Thanks, cdn. I use a few KDE apps, though. Makes a difference, no?
Sarcasm - Another service I offer.
Firefox 3.0 :: XP
cdn
Posts: 999
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 5:47 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by cdn »

was being flippant, since Konqueror is part of kdebase, which is needed by most of the other KDE apps : )
User avatar
Radiowriter
Posts: 3146
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 7:44 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Post by Radiowriter »

cdn wrote:was being flippant, since Konqueror is part of kdebase, which is needed by most of the other KDE apps : )

Dammit, Jim...I'm an end-user, not a friggin' code junky! (Sorry...70's flashback.) Apparently I was veering off the learning curve, there. Thanks for straightening me out! :wink:
Sarcasm - Another service I offer.
Firefox 3.0 :: XP
User avatar
aleejooo
Posts: 207
Joined: December 21st, 2002, 12:00 pm

Post by aleejooo »

cdn wrote:remove KDE


But if you remove Konqueror and also KDE, most of the apps in there will not work properly, something similar to as if in the Windo$$$ world, some1 tries to remove IE completely.
Learn from the mistakes of others. You can't live long enough to make them all yourself.
- A wise bathroom wall.
Post Reply