KWierso wrote:Jim Pivonka wrote:malliz wrote:So you break security features because of lack of understanding and stubbornness.
Applications acting as servers is NOT a security feature, it is an insecurity problem, unless the function of the service is well defined and disclosed - as is the case with myNetWatchman.
I'm not satisfied with the level of disclosure or definition of the bytemobile optimization proxy's need for server authorization; I am willing to wait until I've researched it before blocking it, as it is presented as an integral part of my network access.
The same can not be said of other applications requesting authority to serve information from my computer to the internet.
So what's the difference between having firefox.exe handle plugins' network connectivity versus having plugin-container.exe handle it?
Don't confuse him with logic. It may be one step too far