How Return Addresses Appear In Responses
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
This just started today.
When I respond to an email the person's old email shows "headers" like this... From: Joe <support@joe.com> To: jim@jim.com Subject: Whatever Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2019 But all of a sudden it's showing up as On 4/25/2019 11:47 PM, Jim wrote: What did I do? All that I did today was move the storage folder to a new drive. How do I get the old format back? Thanks!!! See this Knowledge Base article: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Reply_header_settings
Fairly old, don't know if it's up to date. Doug Wilson, "The Makai Guy"
Win10 (64bit): FF 84.0.1 (64bit), TB 78.6.0 (32-bit) ║ Android 10: FF Mobile 84.1.2, No TB for Android available, dammit! What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away - Doobie Brothers ![]() Moving to Thunderbird Support
Thanks for that... but it seems to imply I need an extension to restore the previous header format. But TBird always had it as a default. So what could I have done when I moved the storage folder that changed anything? All I did was rewrite the new file address in C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming\Thunderbird\profile.ini to [General] StartWithLastProfile=1 [Profile0] Name=default IsRelative=0 Path=X:\Documents\MAIL\THUNDERBIRD MAIL\Profiles\3xojffbk.default Default=0 But I should note... that I seem to have lost the find duplicates extension. Don't know when. Maybe there's some connection. PROBLEM SOLVED!!!
It seems the Respond With Header and Remove Duplicate Messages extensions were somehow deleted. It seems the problem is back because the old Respond With Header extension is incompatible with v68.3 of Thunderbird.
I tried two other extensions Compact Headers and Toggle Headers... but neither returns the response headers back to From: Joe <support@joe.com> To: jim@jim.com Subject: Whatever Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2019 as opposed to On 4/25/2019 11:47 PM, Jim wrote: I think you meant the reply with header add-on, not respond with header. The support site has an issue requesting support for version 68. The author said he is working on it and has posted a link to two betas. There are several comments saying RWH v2.2.1-beta works fine.
See https://github.com/jeevatkm/ReplyWithHe ... /issues/88
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest |
![]() |