Special versions of Firefox
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
- Contact:
About tbind.exe
Hello.
Tbind.exe is not a program for preloading the modules.
The modules of my builds have been rebased by ReBase.Exe, etc.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... rebase.asp
Tbind.exe 'binds' the modules. For more information, please see BindImageEx's Remarks.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... mageex.asp
But I cannot feel the modules are loaded faster after binding in my environment (Athlon XP 2500+, Windows 2000)...
Tbind.exe is not a program for preloading the modules.
The modules of my builds have been rebased by ReBase.Exe, etc.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... rebase.asp
Tbind.exe 'binds' the modules. For more information, please see BindImageEx's Remarks.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... mageex.asp
But I cannot feel the modules are loaded faster after binding in my environment (Athlon XP 2500+, Windows 2000)...
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: April 26th, 2005, 5:49 am
- Location: Louisville
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: March 24th, 2005, 8:08 pm
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: April 26th, 2005, 5:49 am
- Location: Louisville
Only problem I'm seeing right now is when Tbird or Firefox has been minimized, the restore is slower than usual. Memory is being swapped?
DFI NF4 SLI Expert | Opteron 165 CCBBE 0616 XPMW (9x325HTT=2.9Ghz) | 2x1GB G.Skill HZ (3-4-4-8-12-16-2T) | Lite-On 165H6S DVD/CD Recorder | Geforce 7300GT | All SATA Drives | Antec 650 Trio PSU | XP SP2
- bloodykiss
- Posts: 62
- Joined: November 8th, 2004, 10:46 am
- Location: Torun, Poland
- whiskydean
- Posts: 36
- Joined: March 12th, 2004, 9:00 am
I tried your G7 trunk and its amazing: It loads fast as hell and its 7-9 % faster than the fastest fx I had on my machine (scragz rendering test, PentiumM, 1.7 Mhz, 1GB, WinXPSP2).
One thing here: Java does not work. I tried all kinds of installation, but no success (J2SE RE 5.0 Update 6).
But this is a small thing compared to the advantages. Great work! It's my reference browser from now on.
One thing here: Java does not work. I tried all kinds of installation, but no success (J2SE RE 5.0 Update 6).
But this is a small thing compared to the advantages. Great work! It's my reference browser from now on.
"Bury me under the bar"
- adamlau
- Posts: 162
- Joined: December 7th, 2004, 6:55 pm
- Location: SoCal-SGV
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
- Contact:
kingsparrow wrote:Don't you do a seamonkey browser only?
I have no plans to build SeaMonkey for now.
macaddict01 wrote:Only problem I'm seeing right now is when Tbird or Firefox has been minimized, the restore is slower than usual. Memory is being swapped?
I usually use my Fx 1.5 build on my PC (Windows 2000 SP4, 512MB), but I have never seen the problem...
whiskydean wrote:Java does not work. I tried all kinds of installation, but no success (J2SE RE 5.0 Update 6).
On my PC, my Fx 1.5 and Trunk can run Java applets though I had installed the same Java environment..
adamlau wrote:So for G7 builds...Replace with G7 private build DLLs *and* mmx2 for P4 systems? Or replace with G7 DLLs *only*? What about for P3 systems...?
For P4 systems, *and* is the best because MMX+ is contained within SSE by Intel.
Similarly, the combination of "g6" and "mmx2" is the best for P3.
By the way, Enhanced 3DNow! includes MMX+, too.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: December 4th, 2004, 12:27 pm
I will give this build a shot, especially your Thunderbird build
If you want to figure out what extensions your CPU supports, download WCPUID or a similar CPU identification program. It will tell you what extensions your CPU supports. Then you can just choose then
When you say modules, are you referring to the DLL files? I am not very literate at these things.
---------
Is it possible to bind, lets say, other builds to your DLL files?
If you want to figure out what extensions your CPU supports, download WCPUID or a similar CPU identification program. It will tell you what extensions your CPU supports. Then you can just choose then
tete009 wrote:Hello.
Tbind.exe is not a program for preloading the modules.
The modules of my builds have been rebased by ReBase.Exe, etc.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... rebase.asp
Tbind.exe 'binds' the modules. For more information, please see BindImageEx's Remarks.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... mageex.asp
But I cannot feel the modules are loaded faster after binding in my environment (Athlon XP 2500+, Windows 2000)...
When you say modules, are you referring to the DLL files? I am not very literate at these things.
---------
Is it possible to bind, lets say, other builds to your DLL files?
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
- Contact:
xaueious wrote:When you say modules, are you referring to the DLL files?
When I say <q>rebase</q> the modules are DLL files.
When <q>bind</q> they are DLL and EXE files.
xaueious wrote:Is it possible to bind, lets say, other builds to your DLL files?
I cannot recommend it because I modified my C/C++ run-time libraries and I made some functions inline.
If using the files of different builds together, this may create unexpected errors.
- whiskydean
- Posts: 36
- Joined: March 12th, 2004, 9:00 am
New Tete builds of 1.5 + DLLs are out now: http://www1.plala.or.jp/tete009/en-US/h ... l#Y2005_12
I tried the G7 version and guess what: It's faster than the (very fast) previous build. Great work!
I tried the G7 version and guess what: It's faster than the (very fast) previous build. Great work!
"Bury me under the bar"
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm