Special versions of Firefox

Discussion of third-party/unofficial Firefox/Thunderbird/SeaMonkey builds.
Locked
User avatar
bcool
Posts: 638
Joined: December 27th, 2003, 9:01 am
Location: Ozarks

Post by bcool »

tete009 wrote:bcool, thank you for your interest.

bcool wrote:I'm curious from where do you draw your core browser code?

At present, "official Mozilla" 1.5 final release.


I asked this only because it was suggested in another forum that perhaps Pacifica is receiving occasional patches for fixes which could prove useful especially since there appears to be no more fixes going into "official Mozilla" 1.5 release. Have you ever considered trying this Pacifica? I'm sure you know best. Just asking... :)
Never let them see you sweat
JoeyPro
Posts: 44
Joined: September 19th, 2004, 3:43 pm

Post by JoeyPro »

I have a 900mhz Athlon Thunderbird.

It has MMX and Enhanced 3DNow. Which dll should I use? I was thinkin mmx2 but that says for p3 which I thought had sse instructions which mine doesnt have.
tete009
Posts: 43
Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
Contact:

Post by tete009 »

bcool wrote:Have you ever considered trying this Pacifica?

No, I haven't. To my shame, I have no idea what <q>Pacifica</q> is... I may become interested in <q>Pacifica</q> from now on. Thanks a lot. :)


JoeyPro wrote:I have a 900mhz Athlon Thunderbird.

It has MMX and Enhanced 3DNow. Which dll should I use? I was thinkin mmx2 but that says for p3 which I thought had sse instructions which mine doesnt have.

I recommend <q>Enhanced 3DNow!</q> DLL because it contains MMX+ instructions. Though there is the file whose name contains the <q>mmx2</q> character string, it doesn't mean requiring SSE support. I used the <q>mmx2</q> character string as merely the file name.
JoeyPro
Posts: 44
Joined: September 19th, 2004, 3:43 pm

Post by JoeyPro »

Thanks, just started using it, very impressed, nice work!

Everything is blazing fast.

Just making sure I did it right...

Downloaded:
tmsvc-20051212-3dnow-g6.zip
tmemutil-20051212-3dnow2.zip

Extracted both to the firefox folder and then ran tbind.
tete009
Posts: 43
Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
Contact:

Post by tete009 »

JoeyPro wrote:Downloaded:
tmsvc-20051212-3dnow-g6.zip

I think <strong>G7</strong> is more suitable for Athlon.
According to the following document, <q>/<strong>G7</strong> optimizes code for the Intel Pentium 4 or <strong>AMD Athlon</strong>.</q>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... _.2f.g.asp
mmoy
Posts: 5030
Joined: February 17th, 2004, 9:05 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Post by mmoy »

The AMD Athlon is architecturally closer to the Pentium 3 than the Pentium 4 in terms of pipeline length, IPC, etc.
Dell E521 X2 5600+ MacBookPro 17'' 2.5 Ghz Penryn Dell M1330 2.0 Ghz Merom 4 GB Vista x64 Compaq r3000z AMD 64 3200+ (Win 32/64) PowerMac G5 1.8 Ghz MMOY-1.5 (OSX 10) Inspiron 8500, 4100, 4000, Dimension 2300 MacBook Pro 2.2 Ghz HP E6600 HP X2 4400+
tete009
Posts: 43
Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
Contact:

Post by tete009 »

mmoy wrote:The AMD Athlon is architecturally closer to the Pentium 3 than the Pentium 4 in terms of pipeline length, IPC, etc.

I think so, too.
I am using a Athlon XP 2500+ machine, but I cannot feel difference between /G6 and /G7 options on my machine...
JoeyPro
Posts: 44
Joined: September 19th, 2004, 3:43 pm

Post by JoeyPro »

Oh, I have always used g6, I always assumed my processor was like a p2 because it doesnt have sse. I would think an old Thunderbird like mine would be very different than the new Athlon XP.
ice-pack
Posts: 3
Joined: December 24th, 2005, 5:57 am

Post by ice-pack »

tete009 wrote:
mmoy wrote:The AMD Athlon is architecturally closer to the Pentium 3 than the Pentium 4 in terms of pipeline length, IPC, etc.

I think so, too.
I am using a Athlon XP 2500+ machine, but I cannot feel difference between /G6 and /G7 options on my machine...

tete,

Here's my spec:
AMD Duron, 700 MHz (3.5 x 200)
Gigabyte GA-7IXE4 (2 ISA, 5 PCI, 1 AGP, 3 DIMM)<---mobo
AMD-750 Irongate<---mobo chipset

Am I right downloading these files ?
- G6 + MMX (Pentium 2, Pentium 3, etc)
- tmemutil-20051212-3dnow.zip (Zip archive, 8KB)
- tmsvc-20051212-3dnow-g6.zip (Zip archive, 340KB)
User avatar
bcool
Posts: 638
Joined: December 27th, 2003, 9:01 am
Location: Ozarks

Post by bcool »

tete009 wrote:
bcool wrote:Have you ever considered trying this Pacifica?

No, I haven't. To my shame, I have no idea what <q>Pacifica</q> is... I may become interested in <q>Pacifica</q> from now on. Thanks a lot.


May I introduce you to Pacifica Firefox 1.5 builds which are always included in notices like these: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=359273
and can be downloaded for your amusement from here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ ... ozilla1.8/
Perhaps if you become interested, you may even want to produce one of your own builds from this code - if you think it is a good idea to do so. Maybe? :)


---
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051218 Firefox/1.5 (tete009)
tete009
Posts: 43
Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
Contact:

Post by tete009 »

ice-pack wrote:tete,

Here's my spec:
AMD Duron, 700 MHz (3.5 x 200)
Gigabyte GA-7IXE4 (2 ISA, 5 PCI, 1 AGP, 3 DIMM)<---mobo
AMD-750 Irongate<---mobo chipset

Am I right downloading these files ?
- G6 + MMX (Pentium 2, Pentium 3, etc)
- tmemutil-20051212-3dnow.zip (Zip archive, 8KB)
- tmsvc-20051212-3dnow-g6.zip (Zip archive, 340KB)

I hear the Duron processors support <q>Enhanced 3DNow!</q> instructions. I recommend the following file:
tmemutil-20051212-3dnow2.zip (Zip archive, 8KB)

I personally think it is worth trying <strong>G7</strong> on Duron and Athlon.
<q>Visual C++ Optimization Overview</q>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us ... zation.asp
tete009
Posts: 43
Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
Contact:

Post by tete009 »

bcool wrote:May I introduce you to Pacifica Firefox 1.5 builds which are always included in notices like these: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=359273
and can be downloaded for your amusement from here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ ... ozilla1.8/

Thanks for your information about Pacifica.
My English skills aren't highly developed, so I may not be able to translate documents accurately. It takes time to read these documents for me, but I'd like to read them with the aid of translation software.
User avatar
shawn^
Posts: 193
Joined: November 20th, 2005, 1:26 am

Post by shawn^ »

Hi. I just want to make sure I get the right files.

intel P4 2.4ghz here

tmsvc-20051212-mmx-g7.zip (Zip archive, 340KB)
&
tmemutil-20051212-mmx2.zip (Zip archive, 8KB)

would be the most suitable?

also after running tbind, would any damage be done if I choose to remove this build and run another? There's no need to unload anything right?

Thanks :)
tete009
Posts: 43
Joined: December 11th, 2005, 3:24 pm
Contact:

Post by tete009 »

shawn^ wrote:intel P4 2.4ghz here

tmsvc-20051212-mmx-g7.zip (Zip archive, 340KB)
&
tmemutil-20051212-mmx2.zip (Zip archive, 8KB)

would be the most suitable?

Yes, that's the best combination for Pentium 4.

shawn^ wrote:also after running tbind, would any damage be done if I choose to remove this build and run another? There's no need to unload anything right?

That's nothing to worry about. :)
User avatar
bcool
Posts: 638
Joined: December 27th, 2003, 9:01 am
Location: Ozarks

Post by bcool »

tete009 wrote:Thanks for your information about Pacifica.
My English skills aren't highly developed, so I may not be able to translate documents accurately. It takes time to read these documents for me, but I'd like to read them with the aid of translation software.


Image

:) Good luck whatever you do.
Locked