The Official Win32 2004-05-10 build is out.
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: June 21st, 2003, 7:21 pm
- Location: Gurnee, IL
- Contact:
Peter(6) wrote:Right, I'll remove it from the regressionlist than.
Now some good news.... there's a patch for #1 of the bugslist, #239722 )
Hey, wait, you know us Linux users count too - why not just mark it as a Linux only bug? I don't like people who are ingnorant towards Linux...
And nowhere do I see stated that this is a Windows-only build thread...
-
- Posts: 4283
- Joined: May 17th, 2003, 12:05 pm
- Location: London, UK
-
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am
chob wrote:sasquatch - that's just some random crap giving you an example of the layout it will use. ignore it for the time being.
Who is "Ron Jeremy"?
Is that something which should be on a PC which could be seen at work or at home by children? I think this should be taken off immediately if it is something inappropriate.
-
- Posts: 4864
- Joined: October 16th, 2003, 5:47 am
- Location: Somewhere in London, riding the Underground
sasquatch wrote:chob wrote:sasquatch - that's just some random crap giving you an example of the layout it will use. ignore it for the time being.
Who is "Ron Jeremy"?
Is that something which should be on a PC which could be seen at work or at home by children? I think this should be taken off immediately if it is something inappropriate.
Ron Jeremy is a pornstar with large equipment. Is that inappropriate?
Proud user of teh Fox of Fire
Registered Linux User #289618
Registered Linux User #289618
- whorfin
- Posts: 326
- Joined: April 1st, 2003, 3:11 pm
sasquatch wrote:chob wrote:sasquatch - that's just some random crap giving you an example of the layout it will use. ignore it for the time being.
Who is "Ron Jeremy"?
Is that something which should be on a PC which could be seen at work or at home by children? I think this should be taken off immediately if it is something inappropriate.
Ummm... since when is a name, a name that doesn't contain profanity, by the way, "something inappropriate"?
And how the heck do you know who "Ron Jeremy" is anyhow? Been watching some movies you'd like to tell us about?
Lighten up, Francis
-
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Legoguy wrote:Peter(6) wrote:Right, I'll remove it from the regressionlist than.
Hey, wait, you know us Linux users count too - why not just mark it as a Linux only bug? I don't like people who are ingnorant towards Linux...
And nowhere do I see stated that this is a Windows-only build thread...
Well, the initial post only mentions the Windows build, and if you look at the subject, you'll see it says "Win32".
Most of the information Peter(6) posts applies to all platforms, but it seems he's primarily concerned with Windows. He's not doing this in any official capacity...
- whorfin
- Posts: 326
- Joined: April 1st, 2003, 3:11 pm
TheOneKEA wrote:sasquatch wrote:chob wrote:sasquatch - that's just some random crap giving you an example of the layout it will use. ignore it for the time being.
Who is "Ron Jeremy"?
Is that something which should be on a PC which could be seen at work or at home by children? I think this should be taken off immediately if it is something inappropriate.
Ron Jeremy is a pornstar with large equipment. Is that inappropriate?
That's one interpretation. For all we know, it could also be an auto mechanic from Sheboygan who writes code for fun.
Even if it's somebody having fun with their online handle, I fail to see how it's going to warp impressionable young minds.
Lighten up, Francis
- Peter(6)
- Posts: 13011
- Joined: September 4th, 2003, 1:26 am
- Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands
Legoguy wrote:Peter(6) wrote:Right, I'll remove it from the regressionlist than.
Hey, wait, you know us Linux users count too - why not just mark it as a Linux only bug? I don't like people who are ingnorant towards Linux...
And nowhere do I see stated that this is a Windows-only build thread...
I do not wish to discriminate Linux users, but because I don't know anything about Linux (ignorant) I don't want to include it in the report.
I also kick all bugs/fixes that are not marked Win or All (for OS) out.
The trunk/branch issue after 0.9 will be no doubt tough enough to handle in 1 thread.
Maybe in the future I'll add Linux/Max, but give me some time to settle, I'm only doing this for a few month now.
see answer above.michaell wrote:Most of the information Peter(6) posts applies to all platforms, but it seems he's primarily concerned with Windows.
And don't you guys forget it.michaell wrote:He's not doing this in any official capacity...
I'm just a selfappointed volunteer.
Last edited by Peter(6) on May 10th, 2004, 3:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
nightly build threads 20040225 (FF 0.8.0+) - 20120331 (FF14a)
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: June 21st, 2003, 7:21 pm
- Location: Gurnee, IL
- Contact:
I wonder how many people who use nightlies would let their kids touch the computer much less use the nightly...
Although, I'm 16, so nevermind, even though I pretty much own the computer
I think it would be nice, Peter(6), if you changed this from a "The Official Win32 YYYY-MM-DD build is {not} out" to a multi-platform thread, therefore including the increasing amount of Linux users.
More examples:
Win32 Out, Linux Out, Mac out:
The "Official YYYY-MM-DD Nightly build" thread (+W32 +L +Mac)
No builds out except Mac:
The "Official YYYY-MM-DD Nightly build" thread (-W32 -L +Mac)
You get the idea.
It would be really nice for you to include Linux in here too.
Although, I'm 16, so nevermind, even though I pretty much own the computer
I think it would be nice, Peter(6), if you changed this from a "The Official Win32 YYYY-MM-DD build is {not} out" to a multi-platform thread, therefore including the increasing amount of Linux users.
More examples:
Win32 Out, Linux Out, Mac out:
The "Official YYYY-MM-DD Nightly build" thread (+W32 +L +Mac)
No builds out except Mac:
The "Official YYYY-MM-DD Nightly build" thread (-W32 -L +Mac)
You get the idea.
It would be really nice for you to include Linux in here too.
Last edited by Legoguy on May 10th, 2004, 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- PhoenixNostalgia
- Posts: 562
- Joined: September 27th, 2003, 10:13 pm
lordmedikit wrote:Can anyone confirm that the DOM Inspector is broken as per this thread?
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... highlight=
Yes, I get a large XML parsing error window instead.
- Peter(6)
- Posts: 13011
- Joined: September 4th, 2003, 1:26 am
- Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands