[Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
- Endor
- Posts: 146
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 8:03 am
- Location: Somewhere in Space
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
Hi squashr1979.
I checked this now on babelzilla, there is this error too in the German locale in the same file.
I am translator for German on babelzilla. I tried to fix this but the German locale is looked
so I am not able to make the necessary changes.
Cheers
Endor
I checked this now on babelzilla, there is this error too in the German locale in the same file.
I am translator for German on babelzilla. I tried to fix this but the German locale is looked
so I am not able to make the necessary changes.
Cheers
Endor
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/54.0
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium - My Versions Info
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium - My Versions Info
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: May 24th, 2008, 11:45 pm
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
squashr1979 i hope this continues on in the web Ex format would have a difficult time with out it
- Melchior82
- Posts: 97
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 11:43 pm
- Location: NH, USA
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
IT should be simple enough to port right?! lolmikezilla2 wrote:squashr1979 i hope this continues on in the web Ex format would have a difficult time with out it
who knows...
as far as GENERAL feedback
Its working fine for me STILL in
- Firefox (v54.0.1)
- Firefox (v52.3.0)(ESR, moved to it to keep my extensions working till ESR moved to v59 I think next year)
- Waterfox (v54.0.1)(Waterfox is a FORK of Firefox... THAT WILL KEEP XUL/XPCOM ext. support FOR NOW or LONGER)
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: May 24th, 2008, 11:45 pm
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
try switching on E10
- Melchior82
- Posts: 97
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 11:43 pm
- Location: NH, USA
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
lol yeah right.. not many of the extension I use are e10 compatible..mikezilla2 wrote:try switching on E10
so not gonna happen... :/
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: May 24th, 2008, 11:45 pm
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
No replacement ?
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: May 24th, 2008, 11:45 pm
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
Well this is busted in the most recent update
XML problem ...........
XML problem ...........
- Melchior82
- Posts: 97
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 11:43 pm
- Location: NH, USA
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
really?? how so...mikezilla2 wrote: Well this is busted in the most recent update
XML problem ...........
DMT seems to be working for me just fine..
update?
Firefox or DMT update?
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
go AMO -> "Elite Download Manager"
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: May 24th, 2008, 11:45 pm
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
the download window shows up as an errorMelchior82 wrote:really?? how so...mikezilla2 wrote: Well this is busted in the most recent update
XML problem ...........
DMT seems to be working for me just fine..
update?
Firefox or DMT update?
DMT hasnt had an update in ages
( FF56)
Brummelchen wrote:go AMO -> "Elite Download Manager"
Guess what- that dosnt work ether.............
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
means what? which error? more details please if!
i have it working in chromium and firefox 57.
i have it working in chromium and firefox 57.
- Melchior82
- Posts: 97
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 11:43 pm
- Location: NH, USA
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
Elite Download Manager seems ok...
but a lot of white space..
meh...
and lacks configurable options... at this point in time...
but a lot of white space..
meh...
and lacks configurable options... at this point in time...
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: January 20th, 2009, 11:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
My Firefox upgraded to 56 and DMT is broken (Line Number 85, Column 5). I think it had something to do with cntl-F to search in the downloads. DMT is fixed with 1.0.13 and submitted to AMO. AMO will finish their review and put it out in the next day or two.
I still hope to make a DMT rewrite for Firefox 57, as I want to use DMT myself. I don't know it will be finished in time for the Firefox 57 release. They have modified their stance and now Firefox 57 will not support legacy extensions like DMT.
I still hope to make a DMT rewrite for Firefox 57, as I want to use DMT myself. I don't know it will be finished in time for the Firefox 57 release. They have modified their stance and now Firefox 57 will not support legacy extensions like DMT.
squashr1979, the developer of Download Manager Tweak for Firefox versions 3.0 and newer.
- Melchior82
- Posts: 97
- Joined: December 10th, 2008, 11:43 pm
- Location: NH, USA
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
HI squashr1979,squashr1979 wrote:My Firefox upgraded to 56 and DMT is broken (Line Number 85, Column 5). I think it had something to do with cntl-F to search in the downloads. DMT is fixed with 1.0.13 and submitted to AMO. AMO will finish their review and put it out in the next day or two.
I still hope to make a DMT rewrite for Firefox 57, as I want to use DMT myself. I don't know it will be finished in time for the Firefox 57 release. They have modified their stance and now Firefox 57 will not support legacy extensions like DMT.
glad to see your are still with us in the land of the living lol
YUP STUPID MOZILLA is throwing all of user Extension users UNDER THE BUS as it were...
I moved to Firefox ESR v52.x for now till ESR moves to v59 next June... meh...
I have too many critical addons to chance moving to v57+ so.. I will probably move to Waterfox a fork of Firefox that plans to keep
XUL/Legacy extension system as well as Web Extensions.. :/ O_o
could u keep it compatibly with a min of Firefox v52.x+?? please...
Last edited by Melchior82 on September 30th, 2017, 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am
Re: [Ext] Download Manager Tweak 0.8.x
everybody is free to use a browser he wants to - but PLEASE stop crying us rivers because mozilla changed things and the extension authors are not willing to follow - blame them and not mozilla.
feel free to improve yourself and extend or write your own extension.and lacks configurable options