MozillaZine

[Ext] uBlock Origin

Announce and Discuss the Latest Theme and Extension Releases.
GHM113

User avatar
 
Posts: 583
Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
Location: Moscow, Russia

Post Posted April 23rd, 2017, 1:26 pm

I would like to install 1.12.3b0 but it is no available on AMO. Gorhill, could you upload 1.12.3b0 to AMO, please? I can't wait to try out new uBO beta :D
I am an idiot. Sorry for my poor English. Current list of config tweaks: https://pastebin.com/1dCT4Cvp

GµårÐïåñ

User avatar
 
Posts: 183
Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
Location: Area 51.2

Post Posted April 23rd, 2017, 1:47 pm

GHM113 wrote:I would like to install 1.12.3b0 but it is no available on AMO. Gorhill, could you upload 1.12.3b0 to AMO, please? I can't wait to try out new uBO beta :D

He doesn't control the timeline for when Mozilla reviews and releases the updates, you just have to wait or get it from source.
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k

GHM113

User avatar
 
Posts: 583
Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
Location: Moscow, Russia

Post Posted April 23rd, 2017, 1:50 pm

GµårÐïåñ wrote:He doesn't control the timeline for when Mozilla reviews and releases the updates, you just have to wait or get it from source.

But beta builds are not reviewed by Mozilla :?:
I am an idiot. Sorry for my poor English. Current list of config tweaks: https://pastebin.com/1dCT4Cvp

GµårÐïåñ

User avatar
 
Posts: 183
Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
Location: Area 51.2

Post Posted April 23rd, 2017, 6:01 pm

GHM113 wrote:But beta builds are not reviewed by Mozilla :?:

Technically, yes, you'd be correct. However, the same system is responsible for releasing them, so even automated release, it is on their timeline.

SO, here, take this: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases/download/1.12.3b0/uBlock0.firefox.xpi
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k

GHM113

User avatar
 
Posts: 583
Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
Location: Moscow, Russia

Post Posted April 24th, 2017, 1:18 am

GµårÐïåñ wrote:Technically, yes, you'd be correct. However, the same system is responsible for releasing them, so even automated release, it is on their timeline.
SO, here, take this:

Thank you very much! :D
I am an idiot. Sorry for my poor English. Current list of config tweaks: https://pastebin.com/1dCT4Cvp

Yaron10
 
Posts: 439
Joined: July 5th, 2011, 6:32 am

Post Posted April 29th, 2017, 7:28 am

Feature Request: block pages' auto-refresh.

Thank you.

GµårÐïåñ

User avatar
 
Posts: 183
Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
Location: Area 51.2

Post Posted April 29th, 2017, 1:03 pm

Yaron10 wrote:Feature Request: block pages' auto-refresh.
Thank you.

While not perfect, I have achieved this by simply denying inline-scripts to the page or using the filter to block whatever method they use to do it. Of course, that's if you want manual control, if you want to block it all, then you can just check in Firefox's own settings to stop it.
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k

Yaron10
 
Posts: 439
Joined: July 5th, 2011, 6:32 am

Post Posted April 29th, 2017, 1:36 pm

Hello GµårÐïåñ,

Thanks for replying. I appreciate it.

Yes, I'd like to have an option to block auto-refresh in all sites.
Setting "accessibility.blockautorefresh" to "true" does not work in many sites.

Best regards.

GµårÐïåñ

User avatar
 
Posts: 183
Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
Location: Area 51.2

Post Posted April 29th, 2017, 9:03 pm

Yaron10 wrote:Hello GµårÐïåñ,

Thanks for replying. I appreciate it.

Yes, I'd like to have an option to block auto-refresh in all sites.
Setting "accessibility.blockautorefresh" to "true" does not work in many sites.

Best regards.

Yes you are right, some sites can still jump that block built into Firefox, but on the sites that jump it, I have noticed setting inline-script block takes care of it but if there is a more elegant way to do it, maybe Ray can weigh in. There is no "perfect" solution that I know but what I use works for me, so if all else fails, you might need to find the best bad solution for your situation.
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k

Yaron10
 
Posts: 439
Joined: July 5th, 2011, 6:32 am

Post Posted April 30th, 2017, 12:49 pm

@GµårÐïåñ,

Thanks again. I appreciate your help.

GµårÐïåñ

User avatar
 
Posts: 183
Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
Location: Area 51.2

Post Posted May 5th, 2017, 3:08 am

Yaron10 wrote:@GµårÐïåñ,
Thanks again. I appreciate your help.

You are welcome.
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k

ChewInternetExplorer

User avatar
 
Posts: 63
Joined: April 7th, 2011, 10:14 am

Post Posted May 17th, 2017, 7:34 am

Bug:—

    Cosmetic filters have stopped working on v1.12.5b2.

delicacy1
 
Posts: 270
Joined: September 28th, 2016, 11:25 am

Post Posted May 17th, 2017, 7:52 am

Is GµårÐïåñ the author of the addon ?

Virtual_ManPL

User avatar
 
Posts: 1887
Joined: July 24th, 2008, 5:52 am

Post Posted May 17th, 2017, 8:29 am

@ delicacy1 - No, the author is Raymond Hill (gorhill), so the OP of this thread.
Virtualfox persona

Are you ready for deprecation of XUL & XBL & XPCOM extensions? Not?! Try Firefox ESR

GHM113

User avatar
 
Posts: 583
Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
Location: Moscow, Russia

Post Posted May 17th, 2017, 8:33 am

ChewInternetExplorer wrote:Bug:—

    Cosmetic filters have stopped working on v1.12.5b2.

I can't reproduce, cosmetic filters work on 1.12.5b2 at least on https://www.overclockers.ru/ in my case. What STR did you use?
I am an idiot. Sorry for my poor English. Current list of config tweaks: https://pastebin.com/1dCT4Cvp

Return to Extension/Theme Releases


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests