[Ext] uBlock Origin
- GHM113
- Posts: 707
- Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
I would like to install 1.12.3b0 but it is no available on AMO. Gorhill, could you upload 1.12.3b0 to AMO, please? I can't wait to try out new uBO beta
Sorry for my poor English.
- GµårÐïåñ
- Posts: 218
- Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
- Location: Area 51.2
- Contact:
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
He doesn't control the timeline for when Mozilla reviews and releases the updates, you just have to wait or get it from source.GHM113 wrote:I would like to install 1.12.3b0 but it is no available on AMO. Gorhill, could you upload 1.12.3b0 to AMO, please? I can't wait to try out new uBO beta
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k
- GHM113
- Posts: 707
- Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
But beta builds are not reviewed by MozillaGµårÐïåñ wrote:He doesn't control the timeline for when Mozilla reviews and releases the updates, you just have to wait or get it from source.
Sorry for my poor English.
- GµårÐïåñ
- Posts: 218
- Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
- Location: Area 51.2
- Contact:
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
Technically, yes, you'd be correct. However, the same system is responsible for releasing them, so even automated release, it is on their timeline.GHM113 wrote:But beta builds are not reviewed by Mozilla
SO, here, take this: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/relea ... irefox.xpi
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k
- GHM113
- Posts: 707
- Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
Thank you very much!GµårÐïåñ wrote:Technically, yes, you'd be correct. However, the same system is responsible for releasing them, so even automated release, it is on their timeline.
SO, here, take this:
Sorry for my poor English.
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: July 5th, 2011, 6:32 am
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
Feature Request: block pages' auto-refresh.
Thank you.
Thank you.
- GµårÐïåñ
- Posts: 218
- Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
- Location: Area 51.2
- Contact:
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
While not perfect, I have achieved this by simply denying inline-scripts to the page or using the filter to block whatever method they use to do it. Of course, that's if you want manual control, if you want to block it all, then you can just check in Firefox's own settings to stop it.Yaron10 wrote:Feature Request: block pages' auto-refresh.
Thank you.
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: July 5th, 2011, 6:32 am
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
Hello GµårÐïåñ,
Thanks for replying. I appreciate it.
Yes, I'd like to have an option to block auto-refresh in all sites.
Setting "accessibility.blockautorefresh" to "true" does not work in many sites.
Best regards.
Thanks for replying. I appreciate it.
Yes, I'd like to have an option to block auto-refresh in all sites.
Setting "accessibility.blockautorefresh" to "true" does not work in many sites.
Best regards.
- GµårÐïåñ
- Posts: 218
- Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
- Location: Area 51.2
- Contact:
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
Yes you are right, some sites can still jump that block built into Firefox, but on the sites that jump it, I have noticed setting inline-script block takes care of it but if there is a more elegant way to do it, maybe Ray can weigh in. There is no "perfect" solution that I know but what I use works for me, so if all else fails, you might need to find the best bad solution for your situation.Yaron10 wrote:Hello GµårÐïåñ,
Thanks for replying. I appreciate it.
Yes, I'd like to have an option to block auto-refresh in all sites.
Setting "accessibility.blockautorefresh" to "true" does not work in many sites.
Best regards.
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: July 5th, 2011, 6:32 am
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
@GµårÐïåñ,
Thanks again. I appreciate your help.
Thanks again. I appreciate your help.
- GµårÐïåñ
- Posts: 218
- Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:43 pm
- Location: Area 51.2
- Contact:
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
You are welcome.Yaron10 wrote:@GµårÐïåñ,
Thanks again. I appreciate your help.
Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k
- ChewInternetExplorer
- Posts: 63
- Joined: April 7th, 2011, 10:14 am
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
Bug:—
- Cosmetic filters have stopped working on v1.12.5b2.
-
- Posts: 304
- Joined: September 28th, 2016, 11:25 am
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
Is GµårÐïåñ the author of the addon ?
- Virtual_ManPL
- Posts: 2052
- Joined: July 24th, 2008, 5:52 am
- Contact:
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
@ delicacy1 - No, the author is Raymond Hill (gorhill), so the OP of this thread.
Virtualfox persona
Tired of constant Firefox UI changes? XUL extensions are not working anymore? Try SeaMonkey, Waterfox Classic, Pale Moon.
Tired of constant Firefox UI changes? XUL extensions are not working anymore? Try SeaMonkey, Waterfox Classic, Pale Moon.
- GHM113
- Posts: 707
- Joined: December 16th, 2015, 3:59 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: [Ext] uBlock Origin
I can't reproduce, cosmetic filters work on 1.12.5b2 at least on https://www.overclockers.ru/ in my case. What STR did you use?ChewInternetExplorer wrote:Bug:—
- Cosmetic filters have stopped working on v1.12.5b2.
Sorry for my poor English.