[ext] ImageTweak 0.23 (beta) - now with 100% more video!

Tuxman · Post by **Tuxman** » April 2nd, 2008, 1:34 pm

By a toolbar button or a shortcut?
Try to keep ImageTweak simple.

wossName · Post by **wossName** » April 2nd, 2008, 1:40 pm

Cool, I'll keep an eye on AMO and this thread.

About the colorpicker, yeah, I think a white to black slider would cover most cases.

Thanks,
wossName

CAFxX · Post by **CAFxX** » April 2nd, 2008, 2:03 pm

Tuxman wrote:Try to keep ImageTweak simple.

You can bet on this one...

wossName · Post by **wossName** » April 4th, 2008, 5:39 am

Just out of curiosity, what's the maxVersion configured on AMO for ImageTweak ?

I currently can't install my own sandboxed extension from AMO in Firefox 3.0b5, even though I bumped the maxVersion.
Your install.rdf specifies 3.0pre, so it's possible that the compatibility check for sandboxed extensions is broken.

CAFxX · Post by **CAFxX** » April 4th, 2008, 5:49 am

Actually I read on one of the countless posts on planet mozilla that they enabled 3.0pre on AMO. So I decided (since IT does not use bleeding edge features but rather frozen ones) to skip 3.0b5...

CAFxX · Post by **CAFxX** » April 5th, 2008, 2:31 pm

It looks like the XUL slider element was added in fx3, so I suppose there may be problems for fx2 users if I use it. Maybe someone who knows more may give some advice on this...

CAFxX · Post by **CAFxX** » April 8th, 2008, 2:17 pm

CAFxX wrote:0.13 will likely include the fix to wossName's history navigation problem, and DeathWolf's "regular zoom levels" feature.

fixed the problem, and (almost) added the regular zoom levels feature.
I just uploaded it to babelzilla to have a new string translated. a few days and 0.13 should be ready.

Tuxman · Post by **Tuxman** » April 8th, 2008, 2:19 pm

German trs. done immediately.

CAFxX · Post by **CAFxX** » April 8th, 2008, 2:29 pm

thanks tuxman!

Tuxman · Post by **Tuxman** » April 8th, 2008, 2:34 pm

No problem.

wossName · Post by **wossName** » April 9th, 2008, 2:03 am

CAFxX wrote:It looks like the XUL slider element was added in fx3, so I suppose there may be problems for fx2 users if I use it. Maybe someone who knows more may give some advice on this...

Yeah, seems to be a new control. Is it possible to load elements dynamically for different application versions ?
I guess you could abuse a scrollbar (potentially ugly) or use some other means of selecting degrees of blackness.

CAFxX · Post by **CAFxX** » April 9th, 2008, 2:20 am

wossName wrote:
CAFxX wrote:It looks like the XUL slider element was added in fx3, so I suppose there may be problems for fx2 users if I use it. Maybe someone who knows more may give some advice on this...

Yeah, seems to be a new control. Is it possible to load elements dynamically for different application versions ?
I guess you could abuse a scrollbar (potentially ugly) or use some other means of selecting degrees of blackness.

I don't know if I can provide different XUL overlays for different versions (I'm not taking into consideration the possibility to fork the extension), but maybe I can insert a placeholder, and then at startup injecting the appropriate element via js. That's not really elegant, but should work.

CAFxX · Post by **CAFxX** » April 9th, 2008, 12:12 pm

ImageTweak 0.13 is on AMO! Go grab it while it's hot!

I wish to thank everyone that reported bugs or suggested features, and everyone over at babelzilla for their help with l10n.

Tuxman · Post by **Tuxman** » April 9th, 2008, 12:22 pm

Updating, thanks for your work.

makondo · Post by **makondo** » April 9th, 2008, 5:01 pm

Thanks for the update and congrats!
(i still see 'experimental' - is it a new 'sandbox' term or is it how they now label all extensions?)