I successfully built PPC versions of 2.5 and 2.6.1 but 2.7 a no go
Is PCRE going away ? Seems that's where the mess is - missing files etc
From what i've read PCRE is a faster interpreter than the YARR interpreter.
So what's the deal with the missing file ? jslt.h for starters - is this going to be made self consistent anytime soon so that at the very least it can be compiled ?
Thanks
So what happened to the JS code ?
- Philip Chee
- Posts: 6475
- Joined: March 1st, 2005, 3:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: So what happened to the JS code ?
hikerbiker wrote:I successfully built PPC versions of 2.5 and 2.6.1 but 2.7 a no go
Is PCRE going away ? Seems that's where the mess is - missing files etc
From what i've read PCRE is a faster interpreter than the YARR interpreter.
So what's the deal with the missing file ? jslt.h for starters - is this going to be made self consistent anytime soon so that at the very least it can be compiled ?
Thanks
Don't know but at the very least you'd need to look at the set of patches TenFourFox is using to get Firefox 10 to compile.
Phil
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: October 31st, 2005, 5:19 pm
Re: So what happened to the JS code ?
My point is no patches were necessary for prior builds and that code runs fine - why release code that wont compile is the issue here. Don't release a build that won't compile and if it's a work in progress then leave the old working code be until the new code is ready for prime time. Seriously !
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: March 24th, 2011, 9:21 pm
Re: So what happened to the JS code ?
hikerbiker, look at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691898
Mozilla doesn't test non-JIT builds very well. We get around this in TenFourFox by actually having a JIT.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691898
Mozilla doesn't test non-JIT builds very well. We get around this in TenFourFox by actually having a JIT.
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: October 31st, 2005, 5:19 pm
Re: So what happened to the JS code ?
Yes your having the JIT and associated PPC HW support is the best ultimate solution, no doubt.
2.6.1 was built with PCRE - so why the migration away from PCRE and to YARR even with the performance hit you describe ? Thanks for filling in some of the 'history' here.
2.6.1 was built with PCRE - so why the migration away from PCRE and to YARR even with the performance hit you describe ? Thanks for filling in some of the 'history' here.