where are the nightlies?

Bergamot · Post by **Bergamot** » January 23rd, 2013, 10:45 pm

What's happened to nightly builds? Windows latest trunk is 2 weeks old. comm-central-trunk-win32-nightly-build463.txt.gz from Jan 22 shows some kind of compile error.
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/s ... ral-trunk/

therube · Post by **therube** » January 23rd, 2013, 11:17 pm

Probably this, Bug 829481 - SeaMonkey Windows builds fail with "python.exe: Bad file number" error.

Bergamot · Post by **Bergamot** » January 24th, 2013, 1:36 am

therube wrote:Probably this, Bug 829481 - SeaMonkey Windows builds fail with "python.exe: Bad file number" error.

"filename too long"? hard to believe this kind of problem still exists. Anyway, it looks like it might have just been fixed.

Post by **rsx11m** » January 24th, 2013, 5:00 pm

The last attempt to build a Windows trunk nightly was before the patch shortening the target directory name was checked in. FWIW, the most recent Mac nightly builds went through yesterday morning; that was before the patch landed as well, though.

Post by **rsx11m** » January 25th, 2013, 6:04 am

Windows 2.18a1 nightly builds were successful this morning, thus you should get an update offered now.

WaltS48 · Post by **WaltS48** » January 25th, 2013, 8:19 am

Last Linux I see in latest-comm-central-trunk is 2.17a1 from 01-05-2013..

Should I be looking somewhere else, or has Linux been dropped?

therube · Post by **therube** » January 25th, 2013, 8:48 am

That's the last

.
For now

.
Until they get their ducks in a row :-)

.

vazhavandan · Post by **vazhavandan** » January 25th, 2013, 9:11 am

Last Linux build was on 01-05-2013. So it is a monthly instead of a nightly :-)

Post by **rsx11m** » January 25th, 2013, 3:59 pm

Yeah, Linux seems to be a mess - all tinderboxes are burning. I don't know what the issue is with those...

Pim · Post by **Pim** » January 31st, 2013, 1:08 pm

Yeah, odd. The "releases" directory has a 2.16b2 version from 25 January though.

Post by **rsx11m** » January 31st, 2013, 3:47 pm

The beta and aurora channels aren't affected, just trunk is having problems (apparently because of higher Python requirements and issues with the packaging, no Mac OSX either since January 23).

tqft · Post by **tqft** » February 1st, 2013, 2:45 am

Last version I managed to build was 15 Jan for linux.
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0 SeaMonkey/2.18a1
Build identifier: 20130115172527

Post by **rsx11m** » February 3rd, 2013, 7:39 pm

There was another recent regression from mozilla-central, bug 788293 on "e4x" removal (whatever that is/now was/ good for). Thunderbird has checked in a patch with bug 759422, covering the mail/ and mailnews/ usages, but I'd assume that similar suite/ cleanups are needed to resolve the SeaMonkey bustages.

Thus, it doesn't look much like nightly trunk builds tomorrow either...

Philip Chee · Post by **Philip Chee** » February 4th, 2013, 5:56 am

rsx11m wrote:There was another recent regression from mozilla-central, bug 788293 on "e4x" removal (whatever that is/now was/ good for). Thunderbird has checked in a patch with bug 759422, covering the mail/ and mailnews/ usages, but I'd assume that similar suite/ cleanups are needed to resolve the SeaMonkey bustages.

Thus, it doesn't look much like nightly trunk builds tomorrow either...

According to Neil we don't use the e4x bits although it's in shared /mailnews/ code. However we are affected by:
Bug 808785 - Stop shipping d3dx9_43.dll
See:
Bug 837568 - Port |Bug 808785 - Stop shipping d3dx9_43.dll| to SeaMonkey
We also need:
Bug 837570 - Fix OSX64 buildage from |Bug 780561 - (new-packager) Overhaul the packager|

Phil

tqft · Post by **tqft** » February 5th, 2013, 5:31 am

I got a working build today.

Name SeaMonkey
Version 2.18a1
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0 SeaMonkey/2.18a1
Build identifier: 20130205111240

where are the nightlies?

where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?

Re: where are the nightlies?