Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Discussion about Seamonkey builds
Post Reply
Zerebralus
Posts: 102
Joined: September 3rd, 2014, 7:20 am

Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by Zerebralus »

first... ghostery doesn't work :-(

second: Names of Addons (name an version number) are squeezed :-(
User avatar
WaltS48
Posts: 5141
Joined: May 7th, 2010, 9:38 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by WaltS48 »

Names of add-ons squeezed?

If you mean they don't show the version number like this screen shot.

http://s2.postimg.org/czcojw41l/addonsm ... umbers.png

That is due to a bug fix in shared code with Firefox.

You can hover the mouse over the extensions name to show a tool tip with the version number, click the More link or use Help > Troubleshooting Information to see a complete list of your extensions with version numbers.

If you mean something else, try restarting in safe mode.
Linux Desktop - AMD Athlon(tm) II X3 455 3.3GHz | 8.0GB RAM | GeForce GT 630
Windows Notebook - AMD A8 7410 2.2GHz | 6.0GB RAM | AMD Radeon R5
User avatar
therube
Posts: 21714
Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by therube »

Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
User avatar
Pololo
Posts: 42
Joined: July 20th, 2011, 9:42 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by Pololo »

No working drag and drop a contact from one address book to another address book or mailing list.

Bug 1202553 - Moving adresses between different adressbooks
User avatar
Pololo
Posts: 42
Joined: July 20th, 2011, 9:42 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by Pololo »

Tested with SM 2.39a1, it works.
4td8s
Posts: 784
Joined: June 24th, 2009, 1:07 pm

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by 4td8s »

Pololo wrote:Tested with SM 2.39a1, it works.


what about the candidate builds of SM 2.38?
User avatar
Pololo
Posts: 42
Joined: July 20th, 2011, 9:42 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by Pololo »

4td8s wrote:
Pololo wrote:Tested with SM 2.39a1, it works.


what about the candidate builds of SM 2.38?
Not works, tested with the candidate build of SM 2.38 (Build identifier: 20150923215417), normal and safe mode.
Zerebralus
Posts: 102
Joined: September 3rd, 2014, 7:20 am

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by Zerebralus »

sm 2.38 installed... but back to 2.35

one again some gui changes, so that ghostery won't work in SM 2.38. And I also hate this narrow addon-window
Zerebralus
Posts: 102
Joined: September 3rd, 2014, 7:20 am

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by Zerebralus »

once again long waiting for the ghostery fix version :-(
User avatar
WaltS48
Posts: 5141
Joined: May 7th, 2010, 9:38 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by WaltS48 »

So version 5.4.8.1 released on Sept 18th (Works with Firefox for Android 26.0 - 30.0a1, Firefox 26.0 and later, SeaMonkey 2.32 and later) doesn't work in SeaMonkey 2.38 release which has been out since Sept 26th?

Bummer. :cry:
Linux Desktop - AMD Athlon(tm) II X3 455 3.3GHz | 8.0GB RAM | GeForce GT 630
Windows Notebook - AMD A8 7410 2.2GHz | 6.0GB RAM | AMD Radeon R5
Zerebralus
Posts: 102
Joined: September 3rd, 2014, 7:20 am

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by Zerebralus »

yes the bug was written on the Ghostery forum but...

here:

https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/to ... onkey-2-38

PS: Version 5.4.8.1 still works with the SM 2.35
User avatar
WaltS48
Posts: 5141
Joined: May 7th, 2010, 9:38 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Seamonkey 2.38 beta 1 and Probs

Post by WaltS48 »

Thanks!

I just wanted to clarify what version of Ghostery you were complaining about, since no version was identified anywhere in the threads that I could find.
Linux Desktop - AMD Athlon(tm) II X3 455 3.3GHz | 8.0GB RAM | GeForce GT 630
Windows Notebook - AMD A8 7410 2.2GHz | 6.0GB RAM | AMD Radeon R5
Post Reply