Arias sounds OK, though there is that Opera link there. That was the first thing I thought of when I saw the name before I read through the explanation. I don't dislike the name, but in that context the name seems kinda "me, too"-ish and I think of Phoenix as an innovative product that stands on it's own.
I'm glad to see
Athena getting good support -- I still love the name but I can understand the point that several folks have made that it doesn't seem natural to give an anthropomorphic name to a browser product.
PX is pretty cool, too. It's short, easy to say, and has good legacy meaning. But it's main strength and weakness both derive from it being completely interpretable by the listener, including pronunciation, which may not be the best idea from a branding standpoint. But I really like the legacy thing.
So, I was rolling "Phoenix" around in my head trying to come up with something that is a new name and identifier for the product that has a concrete meaning but which alludes to the old identity of the product. Chopping out the middle of the word, I was left with
Phox, or
Fox.
Hm! Surf over to TESS and check a trademark search on "fox and software" and come up with only one hit, a dead MS patent for the FoxPro database system that expired in 1996.
The more I thought about it, the more I liked the name. Advantages:
- Good identification between animal and browser; both small, quick, cunning, sly, and intelligent
- Cute in appearance and would make a great logo
- Incorporates most of the current Phoenix color scheme (red, black, and white)
- Passes the one-syllable test and is easy on the tongue
- Not currently trademarked at all in the software field
- Plays well across the board to both genders and to both geeks and non-geeks
- "Phox" with a fox logo distances the product from Phoenix for legal reasons while maintaining some link to the past but keeps it from crossing paths directly spelling-wise with the Fox Media Empire(tm)
- Reinvents and revives a discarded MS trademark (how's that for guerilla marketing?)
Just wanted to throw this out there to see what everyone thinks. I don't want to inconvenience the devs as I know they are itching to get on with the next release, and speaking for the user community I can guarantee that we're itching to get it. But I think it is important to be a bit patient and get the best name possible at this point because with a little luck, we'll be using the chosen name a lot for a long, long time.
Top discarded suggestion:
cthulegal - "the browser which cannot be named (for legal reasons)"