My post has nothing to do with security.Grumpus wrote:there is no such thing as a secure computer
[BUSTED] Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
- Grumpus
- Posts: 13246
- Joined: October 19th, 2007, 4:23 am
- Location: ... Da' Swamp
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
@therube - Actually it does. Regardless of intent it is an unblocked avenue of access which is used by the software designers.
You're choice to remain at a certain level of use and maintain your changes does not fit with the default consideration of the designer(s)
You therefore have a security issue where your control and needs are being overridden, again, regardless of your reasons.
You're choice to remain at a certain level of use and maintain your changes does not fit with the default consideration of the designer(s)
You therefore have a security issue where your control and needs are being overridden, again, regardless of your reasons.
Doesn't matter what you say, it's wrong for a toaster to walk around the house and talk to you
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: March 25th, 2006, 11:38 am
- Location: New York State
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
I just checked and that folder was already marked as read only and I was never in that specific area.therube wrote:Similarly...C:\Users\{username}\AppData\Local\Mozilla\updates\Code: Select all
C:\Users\{username}\AppData\Local\Mozilla\updates\{guid}\updates\0
may have multiple {guid} subdirectories.
Seems "trash" (updates; partially downloaded, fully downloaded; partial or full .mar) has a tendency to accumulate in there.
Their very existence, depending on circumstances, probably relates to some claims of "I turned off updates, but FF still updated me", so (IMO) zapping that entire \updates\ sudirectory structure can't hurt.
(There are any number of ways unintended updates can happen. And I believe this is one - even if it may only occur under a particularly odd set of circumstances - as I have had an unexpected update that I can only attribute to this. [And IMO, the "update service" has no bearing on this at all. I have never had the "update service'.])
Is the any way to actually check if any of these fixes actually work other than waiting to see what doesn't happen?
Browsers that don't have a conventional horizontal Menu bar (where it's been for 25 years) are poorly designed. Period. Stop 'fixing' something that isn't broke!
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
It was not my intent that ...\Mozilla\updates\{guid}\updates\0\ was set to read-only, but rather the FF Installation directory.I just checked and that folder was already marked as read only and I was never in that specific area.
Set the instalDir file/directories to read-only as noted.Is the any way to actually check if any of these fixes actually work other than waiting to see what doesn't happen?
Put an older version of FF in.
Allow or attempt to force it to update.
If the update is unsuccessful, does not happen, then you've succeeded.
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: March 25th, 2006, 11:38 am
- Location: New York State
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
Then I misread that other post of yours.therube wrote: It was not my intent that ...\Mozilla\updates\{guid}\updates\0\ was set to read-only, but rather the FF Installation directory
Is there any difference between running an 'Installed' vs a 'Portable' version of FF as to this problem?
Does deleting that update folder have any affect?
FYI;
I added those 4 addresses to my Router to block those domains instead of to the host file (I have two other computers), but those addresses can change. I also renamed the extension of those three 'update' files.
Browsers that don't have a conventional horizontal Menu bar (where it's been for 25 years) are poorly designed. Period. Stop 'fixing' something that isn't broke!
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
I wouldn't think there would be any issue in doing this to "portable" too.'Installed' vs a 'Portable'
(I know nothing of "portable", but) if I'm understanding "portable", I would expect it to not have any bearing on any installed version, as in what is done in "portable" should be "self-contained".
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21178
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
Yep, set it not to update, take 4 copies of the entire portable and move on with your life.therube wrote:... as in what is done in "portable" should be "self-contained".
If 'the worst happens' i.e. it updates (1st world problem) then just use one of the copies instead and then, only then, figure if you need to do something more.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: March 25th, 2006, 11:38 am
- Location: New York State
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
Portable as in; USB, Stand Alone.
Something you don't 'install' (that leaves plenty of leftovers when it is uninstalled). C&P the programs folder wherever you want to (I have a separate folder in the root of 'C'), but it could go anywhere outside the active partition and/or main HDD.
I already have made copies.
Something you don't 'install' (that leaves plenty of leftovers when it is uninstalled). C&P the programs folder wherever you want to (I have a separate folder in the root of 'C'), but it could go anywhere outside the active partition and/or main HDD.
I already have made copies.
Browsers that don't have a conventional horizontal Menu bar (where it's been for 25 years) are poorly designed. Period. Stop 'fixing' something that isn't broke!
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
each build uses its own update storage, example (located in %localappdata%\Mozilla\)
(all folders empty because no update option chosen // dont update)
ofc valid for quantum, i left v56 and others behind.
Code: Select all
updates\56A0749C103C7308
updates\574EB51B8E1B8C4F
updates\6F46E07C08C8A0CD
updates\FF89FD3028C28292
ofc valid for quantum, i left v56 and others behind.
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
Where do you find what the number like "56A0749C103C7308" corresponds back to?
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am
Re: Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
i dont know (and i dont care*), these were only folders in in %localappdata%\Mozilla\
*i dont care because firefox is running flawless, i can not confirm in any way update problems or involuntary updates.
"system wide" means that user has some kind of "GPO" (eg mozilla.cfg) to avoid updates. but this a manually configuration of the installation folder.
(which means copy such file into the portable firefox folder to "firefox.exe")
or user.js into profile.
the maintenance service is only an upgrade helper, the update itself is fired by firefox.
starting with firefox v60 mozilla is going to respect windows gpo.
https://www.ghacks.net/2018/03/10/firef ... y-support/
just running v55 with its profile - where updates are set to "ask" - firefox asked me to upgrade or not.
set to "disabled" firefox wont bother me. tools > about firefox offer me to search for updates. and offer me to upgrade to v56 (strange because v58 is current)
anytime firefox behavior about its updates it concerns the addons too. you can not set one and decline second. but i am not familiar with special settings in pref, i dont know if there is a switch to separate both (or to set intervall to zero for one component).
to add:
those folders had no content here, while regular updates hold an xml file and another subfolder
*i dont care because firefox is running flawless, i can not confirm in any way update problems or involuntary updates.
"system wide" means that user has some kind of "GPO" (eg mozilla.cfg) to avoid updates. but this a manually configuration of the installation folder.
(which means copy such file into the portable firefox folder to "firefox.exe")
or user.js into profile.
the maintenance service is only an upgrade helper, the update itself is fired by firefox.
starting with firefox v60 mozilla is going to respect windows gpo.
https://www.ghacks.net/2018/03/10/firef ... y-support/
just running v55 with its profile - where updates are set to "ask" - firefox asked me to upgrade or not.
set to "disabled" firefox wont bother me. tools > about firefox offer me to search for updates. and offer me to upgrade to v56 (strange because v58 is current)
anytime firefox behavior about its updates it concerns the addons too. you can not set one and decline second. but i am not familiar with special settings in pref, i dont know if there is a switch to separate both (or to set intervall to zero for one component).
to add:
those folders had no content here, while regular updates hold an xml file and another subfolder
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: [BUSTED] Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
edit: 9/10/2018
BUSTED
THIS METHOD NO LONGER WORKS
BUSTED
THIS METHOD NO LONGER WORKS
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: [BUSTED] Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
It could be, that if you also created a file named, update.test, in your installation directory, & set that to read-only, that would get things "fixed" again.
But at that point, you might as well just use Frank's method, & set {instalDir}\defaults\pref\channel-prefs.js to some bogus value.
Note that on checking for updates, manual or automatic, the instalDir does get touched (set to current date/time).
Additionally creating the update.test file & setting it to read-only may thwart that too - if that (touching) matters to you.
---
Frank Lion's method, I guess here is a decent spot to point to, http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14802632.
But at that point, you might as well just use Frank's method, & set {instalDir}\defaults\pref\channel-prefs.js to some bogus value.
Note that on checking for updates, manual or automatic, the instalDir does get touched (set to current date/time).
Additionally creating the update.test file & setting it to read-only may thwart that too - if that (touching) matters to you.
---
Frank Lion's method, I guess here is a decent spot to point to, http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14802632.
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: June 24th, 2009, 1:07 pm
Re: [BUSTED] Globally Disable FF Update - System-wide
yup. does not work anymore - at least with Firefox 63therube wrote:edit: 9/10/2018
BUSTED
THIS METHOD NO LONGER WORKS
https://techdows.com/2018/07/firefox-63 ... moved.html
https://www.ghacks.net/2018/07/28/mozil ... x-updates/