FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Discussion of general topics about Mozilla Firefox
Post Reply
thomaz
Posts: 43
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 1:38 am

FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by thomaz »

Playing same Youtube Video in 480p on same Hardware with a fresh Windows and Firefox Installation.

Firefox 52.5.3 on XP has 2% CPU Usage
Firefox 57.0.4 on Win10 has 25% CPU Usage

Playing Soundcloud:
Firefox 52.5.3 on XP has 5% CPU Usage
Firefox 57.0.4 on Win10 has 20% CPU Usage

So WTF is wrong with "modern" operating systems?
User avatar
Reflective
Posts: 2283
Joined: February 15th, 2007, 11:13 am

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by Reflective »

FF 57.0.4 has been updated to address the Meltdown/Spectre vulnerabilities. FF52.5.3 has not.

Reports elsewhere in the media suggest the patch may reduce performance on some systems.
User avatar
RobertJ
Moderator
Posts: 10880
Joined: October 15th, 2003, 7:40 pm
Location: Chicago IL/Oconomowoc WI

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by RobertJ »

.
Moving to FF General

.
FF 92.0 - TB 78.13 - Mac OSX 10.13.6
Brummelchen
Posts: 4480
Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by Brummelchen »

link to video/sound?
User avatar
James
Moderator
Posts: 28007
Joined: June 18th, 2003, 3:07 pm
Location: Made in Canada

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by James »

Reflective wrote:FF52.5.3 has not.
Reports elsewhere in the media suggest the patch may reduce performance on some systems.
Because SharedArrayBuffer is already disabled in Fx 52 ESR.

Depending on how the final patched for the Intel CPU kernel bug vulnerability are implemented the AMD CPU's may suffer a performance hit as collateral damage. It was requested for Linux kernel to make an exception for AMD cpu's since they are not vulnerable to meltdown.
User avatar
Omega X
Posts: 8225
Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
Location: A Parallel Dimension...

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by Omega X »

It also could be due to H.264 Hardware Acceleration being bugged in Firefox on Windows 10.
User avatar
Frank Lion
Posts: 21178
Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by Frank Lion »

thomaz wrote:Playing same Youtube Video in 480p on same Hardware with a fresh Windows and Firefox Installation.

Firefox 52.5.3 on XP has 2% CPU Usage
A vid on YouTube uses only 2% cpu on XP? Tell that to the saps, coz it ain't true.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
thomaz
Posts: 43
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 1:38 am

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by thomaz »

as i know firefox doesnt use any hw acceleration on xp with html5 player (core i5-2390t).
i dont know what microsoft did since vista, but they did it absolutely bad. :(
Wavelab 6 xp=13%, win10=30%.

360p 1-5% CPU usage
Image
1080p 9-20% CPU usage
Image
User avatar
therube
Posts: 21714
Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: FF52@XP=2%CPU Vs. FF57@Win10=25%CPU

Post by therube »

(Heh.
Your i5 is about 4x my e4300. Maybe that's why I can't duplicate similar results [on XP].
But... my i5-3570k (with on chip graphics) has > "cpu mark" then your 2390T, yet I still use more CPU [my i5 is on Win7] then you.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cp ... 40+2.70GHz
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cp ... +@+1.80GHz
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cp ... 40+3.40GHz)
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Post Reply