0.9.1 coming
Good decision.
Dido. If it isn't working - don't include it. Simple.
Great decision Ben!
I have a question. How can authors be sure that there won't be 0.9.2? Isn't it a mistake that they have to update their themes/extensions every time any subversion is released? Is there any way to say "this will work with all 0.9.x versions"? Second quesion: are there any locales changed between 0.9 and 0.9.1? It's quite important for localizers.
Good deal. 0.9 was botched in a lot of ways.
e-Gandalf, I agree with the 1st question!
I think this bug was fixed with a simple registry edit. I found a view comments (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246078) about it, deleted the specified key, and it worked fine after that....
For 0.9 users, will 0.9.1 be available through the "Software Update" functionality?
Since the Save As functionality was modified, please give us the ability to set our options to get it to work the way it worked in 0.8
<a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244961">Bug 244961</a>
e-Gandalf, how can authors be sure the extension they write today will work with a future release and not break it? Heck, they don't even know the version number of that release. What will "1.0 Beta" be called? It has to be below 1.0. 0.9.2 maybe? Or 0.9.5?
The only more or less safe assumption that can be made is to add the "+" sign. If the extension works with 0.9.1, it will most likely work with 0.9.1+, because that's what the builds will likely to be called shortly after the release. Regarding your second question: There are no locale changes on the 0.9.1 branch yet, compared to the 0.9 release. I already made a post to the n.p.m.l10n newsgroup.
That depends on Ben bumping the pref "app.version" to 0.9.1 and someone uploading a http://update.mozilla.org/update.rdf. Users of Firefox 0.9, 0.9.0+ aviary branch builds and 0.8.0+ trunk builds would then get the update notification. A click on the update button leads them to the Firefox product page. I'm pretty sure Ben will do that as it's a great opportunity to test the new Software Update feature. Last edited by Steffen on June 24th, 2004, 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This is probably not the best thread to discuss this problem but I agree with the folks commenting on having to update extensions and themes every time the Firefox version number changes. It is a good idea to have something in place to ensure that legacy addons cannot be installed but the problems caused by the version changing from 0.9 to 0.9.0+ were a bit absurd.
djl47, I agree, but the new extension management is brand new, and everybody has to make his experiences with it, especially when new versions of Firefox are released.
EDIT: now I've edited every single post I made in this thread :-/
BG: "0.9 release has highlighted a few issues..."
-- nicely understated! This is the RIGHT thing to do.
It might help to decouple extension manager and firefox version numbers. Extensions should only have to list which EM version they're compatible with. If you're not using Firefox, you're not surfing the web, you're suffering it.
Join the MZ folding@home team.
vfwlkr, I think one of the reasons for the new extension management is to avoid installing outdated extensions which break the app.
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
