From the last thread right before it closed: as of some recently Nightly build on Ubuntu, my live bookmarks stopped working. Right clicking what was a live bookmark no longer shows "reload live bookmark". I tried recreating it, in different profiles, with no luck...
daegored4 wrote:From the last thread right before it closed: as of some recently Nightly build on Ubuntu, my live bookmarks stopped working. Right clicking what was a live bookmark no longer shows "reload live bookmark". I tried recreating it, in different profiles, with no luck...
Confirmed on Win32 m-c latest hourly. If you use the 'bookmarks' button the 'reload function' is there on right-click, as well if you open your bookmarks in the sidebar with ctrl+b. It appears in the Library as well.
Anyone know if this was 'intentional' ? or perhaps a side-affect of the removal of Micro-summaries.
daegored4 wrote:From the last thread right before it closed: as of some recently Nightly build on Ubuntu, my live bookmarks stopped working. Right clicking what was a live bookmark no longer shows "reload live bookmark". I tried recreating it, in different profiles, with no luck...
Confirmed on Win32 m-c latest hourly. If you use the 'bookmarks' button the 'reload function' is there on right-click, as well if you open your bookmarks in the sidebar with ctrl+b. It appears in the Library as well.
Anyone know if this was 'intentional' ? or perhaps a side-affect of the removal of Micro-summaries.
[11:25] <KWierso> did the removal of microsummaries break live bookmarks? [11:27] <sheppy> KWierso: I thought live bookmarks were being removed too. Certainly at least some of the interfaces are gone...
Whoa, where did I miss them removing microsummaries?! That's why those broke too then... damn, we **really** rely on them for our internal IT trackers. Anyone know if there are any extensions in the works to replace them?
No Issues here with Livemarks. And they are unrelated to Microsummaries as you can see if you subscribe to a RSS-Feed of you Choice: it's still in the Drop-down, selectable, subscribe-able and the Livemark is reload-able.
Maybe OT in this thread but I don't know where to write it...
On this Webgl demo Minefield (latest nightly) is slower than chrome 11, at least on XP. Slower means that where chrome reach 55-60 fps continuosly, minefield stay around 30-35 fps with some hard disk work too at the start of the demo.. Someone can confirm?
sbi82 wrote:Maybe OT in this thread but I don't know where to write it...
On this Webgl demo Minefield (latest nightly) is slower than chrome 11, at least on XP. Slower means that where chrome reach 55-60 fps continuosly, minefield stay around 30-35 fps with some hard disk work too at the start of the demo.. Someone can confirm?
27min-83max and it stayed at 60+ for the most part
Edit: With 4.0.1 and Aurora it is ok (no crash). Regression?
I filed [*]#654590 [Core:JavaScript Engine]-crash [@ js_strtod(JSContext*, unsigned short const*, unsigned short const*, unsigned short const**, double*)] [Win]
sbi82 wrote:Maybe OT in this thread but I don't know where to write it...
On this Webgl demo Minefield (latest nightly) is slower than chrome 11, at least on XP. Slower means that where chrome reach 55-60 fps continuosly, minefield stay around 30-35 fps with some hard disk work too at the start of the demo.. Someone can confirm?
There's hard disk work at the start of the demo because a lot of WebGL demos don't like to load assets before running. The Hard Disk behavior is present for both Nightly and Chrome.
mozillaZine is an independent Mozilla community and advocacy site. We're not affiliated or endorsed by the Mozilla Corporation but we love them just the same.